Cargando…

Asymmetric dominance and asymmetric mate choice oppose premating isolation after allopatric divergence

Assortative mating promotes reproductive isolation and allows allopatric speciation processes to continue in secondary contact. As mating patterns are determined by mate preferences and intrasexual competition, we investigated male–male competition and behavioral isolation in simulated secondary con...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sefc, Kristina M, Hermann, Caroline M, Steinwender, Bernd, Brindl, Hanna, Zimmermann, Holger, Mattersdorfer, Karin, Postl, Lisbeth, Makasa, Lawrence, Sturmbauer, Christian, Koblmüller, Stephan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4409405/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25937900
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1372
_version_ 1782368199925301248
author Sefc, Kristina M
Hermann, Caroline M
Steinwender, Bernd
Brindl, Hanna
Zimmermann, Holger
Mattersdorfer, Karin
Postl, Lisbeth
Makasa, Lawrence
Sturmbauer, Christian
Koblmüller, Stephan
author_facet Sefc, Kristina M
Hermann, Caroline M
Steinwender, Bernd
Brindl, Hanna
Zimmermann, Holger
Mattersdorfer, Karin
Postl, Lisbeth
Makasa, Lawrence
Sturmbauer, Christian
Koblmüller, Stephan
author_sort Sefc, Kristina M
collection PubMed
description Assortative mating promotes reproductive isolation and allows allopatric speciation processes to continue in secondary contact. As mating patterns are determined by mate preferences and intrasexual competition, we investigated male–male competition and behavioral isolation in simulated secondary contact among allopatric populations. Three allopatric color morphs of the cichlid fish Tropheus were tested against each other. Dyadic male–male contests revealed dominance of red males over bluish and yellow-blotch males. Reproductive isolation in the presence of male–male competition was assessed from genetic parentage in experimental ponds and was highly asymmetric among pairs of color morphs. Red females mated only with red males, whereas the other females performed variable degrees of heteromorphic mating. Discrepancies between mating patterns in ponds and female preferences in a competition-free, two-way choice paradigm suggested that the dominance of red males interfered with positive assortative mating of females of the subordinate morphs and provoked asymmetric hybridization. Between the nonred morphs, a significant excess of negative assortative mating by yellow-blotch females with bluish males did not coincide with asymmetric dominance among males. Hence, both negative assortative mating preferences and interference of male–male competition with positive assortative preferences forestall premating isolation, the latter especially in environments unsupportive of competition-driven spatial segregation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4409405
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BlackWell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44094052015-05-01 Asymmetric dominance and asymmetric mate choice oppose premating isolation after allopatric divergence Sefc, Kristina M Hermann, Caroline M Steinwender, Bernd Brindl, Hanna Zimmermann, Holger Mattersdorfer, Karin Postl, Lisbeth Makasa, Lawrence Sturmbauer, Christian Koblmüller, Stephan Ecol Evol Original Research Assortative mating promotes reproductive isolation and allows allopatric speciation processes to continue in secondary contact. As mating patterns are determined by mate preferences and intrasexual competition, we investigated male–male competition and behavioral isolation in simulated secondary contact among allopatric populations. Three allopatric color morphs of the cichlid fish Tropheus were tested against each other. Dyadic male–male contests revealed dominance of red males over bluish and yellow-blotch males. Reproductive isolation in the presence of male–male competition was assessed from genetic parentage in experimental ponds and was highly asymmetric among pairs of color morphs. Red females mated only with red males, whereas the other females performed variable degrees of heteromorphic mating. Discrepancies between mating patterns in ponds and female preferences in a competition-free, two-way choice paradigm suggested that the dominance of red males interfered with positive assortative mating of females of the subordinate morphs and provoked asymmetric hybridization. Between the nonred morphs, a significant excess of negative assortative mating by yellow-blotch females with bluish males did not coincide with asymmetric dominance among males. Hence, both negative assortative mating preferences and interference of male–male competition with positive assortative preferences forestall premating isolation, the latter especially in environments unsupportive of competition-driven spatial segregation. BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2015-04 2015-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4409405/ /pubmed/25937900 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1372 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Sefc, Kristina M
Hermann, Caroline M
Steinwender, Bernd
Brindl, Hanna
Zimmermann, Holger
Mattersdorfer, Karin
Postl, Lisbeth
Makasa, Lawrence
Sturmbauer, Christian
Koblmüller, Stephan
Asymmetric dominance and asymmetric mate choice oppose premating isolation after allopatric divergence
title Asymmetric dominance and asymmetric mate choice oppose premating isolation after allopatric divergence
title_full Asymmetric dominance and asymmetric mate choice oppose premating isolation after allopatric divergence
title_fullStr Asymmetric dominance and asymmetric mate choice oppose premating isolation after allopatric divergence
title_full_unstemmed Asymmetric dominance and asymmetric mate choice oppose premating isolation after allopatric divergence
title_short Asymmetric dominance and asymmetric mate choice oppose premating isolation after allopatric divergence
title_sort asymmetric dominance and asymmetric mate choice oppose premating isolation after allopatric divergence
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4409405/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25937900
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1372
work_keys_str_mv AT sefckristinam asymmetricdominanceandasymmetricmatechoiceopposeprematingisolationafterallopatricdivergence
AT hermanncarolinem asymmetricdominanceandasymmetricmatechoiceopposeprematingisolationafterallopatricdivergence
AT steinwenderbernd asymmetricdominanceandasymmetricmatechoiceopposeprematingisolationafterallopatricdivergence
AT brindlhanna asymmetricdominanceandasymmetricmatechoiceopposeprematingisolationafterallopatricdivergence
AT zimmermannholger asymmetricdominanceandasymmetricmatechoiceopposeprematingisolationafterallopatricdivergence
AT mattersdorferkarin asymmetricdominanceandasymmetricmatechoiceopposeprematingisolationafterallopatricdivergence
AT postllisbeth asymmetricdominanceandasymmetricmatechoiceopposeprematingisolationafterallopatricdivergence
AT makasalawrence asymmetricdominanceandasymmetricmatechoiceopposeprematingisolationafterallopatricdivergence
AT sturmbauerchristian asymmetricdominanceandasymmetricmatechoiceopposeprematingisolationafterallopatricdivergence
AT koblmullerstephan asymmetricdominanceandasymmetricmatechoiceopposeprematingisolationafterallopatricdivergence