Cargando…
Asymmetric dominance and asymmetric mate choice oppose premating isolation after allopatric divergence
Assortative mating promotes reproductive isolation and allows allopatric speciation processes to continue in secondary contact. As mating patterns are determined by mate preferences and intrasexual competition, we investigated male–male competition and behavioral isolation in simulated secondary con...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BlackWell Publishing Ltd
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4409405/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25937900 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1372 |
_version_ | 1782368199925301248 |
---|---|
author | Sefc, Kristina M Hermann, Caroline M Steinwender, Bernd Brindl, Hanna Zimmermann, Holger Mattersdorfer, Karin Postl, Lisbeth Makasa, Lawrence Sturmbauer, Christian Koblmüller, Stephan |
author_facet | Sefc, Kristina M Hermann, Caroline M Steinwender, Bernd Brindl, Hanna Zimmermann, Holger Mattersdorfer, Karin Postl, Lisbeth Makasa, Lawrence Sturmbauer, Christian Koblmüller, Stephan |
author_sort | Sefc, Kristina M |
collection | PubMed |
description | Assortative mating promotes reproductive isolation and allows allopatric speciation processes to continue in secondary contact. As mating patterns are determined by mate preferences and intrasexual competition, we investigated male–male competition and behavioral isolation in simulated secondary contact among allopatric populations. Three allopatric color morphs of the cichlid fish Tropheus were tested against each other. Dyadic male–male contests revealed dominance of red males over bluish and yellow-blotch males. Reproductive isolation in the presence of male–male competition was assessed from genetic parentage in experimental ponds and was highly asymmetric among pairs of color morphs. Red females mated only with red males, whereas the other females performed variable degrees of heteromorphic mating. Discrepancies between mating patterns in ponds and female preferences in a competition-free, two-way choice paradigm suggested that the dominance of red males interfered with positive assortative mating of females of the subordinate morphs and provoked asymmetric hybridization. Between the nonred morphs, a significant excess of negative assortative mating by yellow-blotch females with bluish males did not coincide with asymmetric dominance among males. Hence, both negative assortative mating preferences and interference of male–male competition with positive assortative preferences forestall premating isolation, the latter especially in environments unsupportive of competition-driven spatial segregation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4409405 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BlackWell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44094052015-05-01 Asymmetric dominance and asymmetric mate choice oppose premating isolation after allopatric divergence Sefc, Kristina M Hermann, Caroline M Steinwender, Bernd Brindl, Hanna Zimmermann, Holger Mattersdorfer, Karin Postl, Lisbeth Makasa, Lawrence Sturmbauer, Christian Koblmüller, Stephan Ecol Evol Original Research Assortative mating promotes reproductive isolation and allows allopatric speciation processes to continue in secondary contact. As mating patterns are determined by mate preferences and intrasexual competition, we investigated male–male competition and behavioral isolation in simulated secondary contact among allopatric populations. Three allopatric color morphs of the cichlid fish Tropheus were tested against each other. Dyadic male–male contests revealed dominance of red males over bluish and yellow-blotch males. Reproductive isolation in the presence of male–male competition was assessed from genetic parentage in experimental ponds and was highly asymmetric among pairs of color morphs. Red females mated only with red males, whereas the other females performed variable degrees of heteromorphic mating. Discrepancies between mating patterns in ponds and female preferences in a competition-free, two-way choice paradigm suggested that the dominance of red males interfered with positive assortative mating of females of the subordinate morphs and provoked asymmetric hybridization. Between the nonred morphs, a significant excess of negative assortative mating by yellow-blotch females with bluish males did not coincide with asymmetric dominance among males. Hence, both negative assortative mating preferences and interference of male–male competition with positive assortative preferences forestall premating isolation, the latter especially in environments unsupportive of competition-driven spatial segregation. BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2015-04 2015-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4409405/ /pubmed/25937900 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1372 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Sefc, Kristina M Hermann, Caroline M Steinwender, Bernd Brindl, Hanna Zimmermann, Holger Mattersdorfer, Karin Postl, Lisbeth Makasa, Lawrence Sturmbauer, Christian Koblmüller, Stephan Asymmetric dominance and asymmetric mate choice oppose premating isolation after allopatric divergence |
title | Asymmetric dominance and asymmetric mate choice oppose premating isolation after allopatric divergence |
title_full | Asymmetric dominance and asymmetric mate choice oppose premating isolation after allopatric divergence |
title_fullStr | Asymmetric dominance and asymmetric mate choice oppose premating isolation after allopatric divergence |
title_full_unstemmed | Asymmetric dominance and asymmetric mate choice oppose premating isolation after allopatric divergence |
title_short | Asymmetric dominance and asymmetric mate choice oppose premating isolation after allopatric divergence |
title_sort | asymmetric dominance and asymmetric mate choice oppose premating isolation after allopatric divergence |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4409405/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25937900 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1372 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sefckristinam asymmetricdominanceandasymmetricmatechoiceopposeprematingisolationafterallopatricdivergence AT hermanncarolinem asymmetricdominanceandasymmetricmatechoiceopposeprematingisolationafterallopatricdivergence AT steinwenderbernd asymmetricdominanceandasymmetricmatechoiceopposeprematingisolationafterallopatricdivergence AT brindlhanna asymmetricdominanceandasymmetricmatechoiceopposeprematingisolationafterallopatricdivergence AT zimmermannholger asymmetricdominanceandasymmetricmatechoiceopposeprematingisolationafterallopatricdivergence AT mattersdorferkarin asymmetricdominanceandasymmetricmatechoiceopposeprematingisolationafterallopatricdivergence AT postllisbeth asymmetricdominanceandasymmetricmatechoiceopposeprematingisolationafterallopatricdivergence AT makasalawrence asymmetricdominanceandasymmetricmatechoiceopposeprematingisolationafterallopatricdivergence AT sturmbauerchristian asymmetricdominanceandasymmetricmatechoiceopposeprematingisolationafterallopatricdivergence AT koblmullerstephan asymmetricdominanceandasymmetricmatechoiceopposeprematingisolationafterallopatricdivergence |