Cargando…

Lake size and fish diversity determine resource use and trophic position of a top predator in high-latitude lakes

Prey preference of top predators and energy flow across habitat boundaries are of fundamental importance for structure and function of aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems, as they may have strong effects on production, species diversity, and food-web stability. In lakes, littoral and pelagic food-web...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eloranta, Antti P, Kahilainen, Kimmo K, Amundsen, Per-Arne, Knudsen, Rune, Harrod, Chris, Jones, Roger I
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4409414/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25937909
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1464
_version_ 1782368201983655936
author Eloranta, Antti P
Kahilainen, Kimmo K
Amundsen, Per-Arne
Knudsen, Rune
Harrod, Chris
Jones, Roger I
author_facet Eloranta, Antti P
Kahilainen, Kimmo K
Amundsen, Per-Arne
Knudsen, Rune
Harrod, Chris
Jones, Roger I
author_sort Eloranta, Antti P
collection PubMed
description Prey preference of top predators and energy flow across habitat boundaries are of fundamental importance for structure and function of aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems, as they may have strong effects on production, species diversity, and food-web stability. In lakes, littoral and pelagic food-web compartments are typically coupled and controlled by generalist fish top predators. However, the extent and determinants of such coupling remains a topical area of ecological research and is largely unknown in oligotrophic high-latitude lakes. We analyzed food-web structure and resource use by a generalist top predator, the Arctic charr Salvelinus alpinus (L.), in 17 oligotrophic subarctic lakes covering a marked gradient in size (0.5–1084 km(2)) and fish species richness (2–13 species). We expected top predators to shift from littoral to pelagic energy sources with increasing lake size, as the availability of pelagic prey resources and the competition for littoral prey are both likely to be higher in large lakes with multispecies fish communities. We also expected top predators to occupy a higher trophic position in lakes with greater fish species richness due to potential substitution of intermediate consumers (prey fish) and increased piscivory by top predators. Based on stable carbon and nitrogen isotope analyses, the mean reliance of Arctic charr on littoral energy sources showed a significant negative relationship with lake surface area, whereas the mean trophic position of Arctic charr, reflecting the lake food-chain length, increased with fish species richness. These results were supported by stomach contents data demonstrating a shift of Arctic charr from an invertebrate-dominated diet to piscivory on pelagic fish. Our study highlights that, because they determine the main energy source (littoral vs. pelagic) and the trophic position of generalist top predators, ecosystem size and fish diversity are particularly important factors influencing function and structure of food webs in high-latitude lakes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4409414
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BlackWell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44094142015-05-01 Lake size and fish diversity determine resource use and trophic position of a top predator in high-latitude lakes Eloranta, Antti P Kahilainen, Kimmo K Amundsen, Per-Arne Knudsen, Rune Harrod, Chris Jones, Roger I Ecol Evol Original Research Prey preference of top predators and energy flow across habitat boundaries are of fundamental importance for structure and function of aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems, as they may have strong effects on production, species diversity, and food-web stability. In lakes, littoral and pelagic food-web compartments are typically coupled and controlled by generalist fish top predators. However, the extent and determinants of such coupling remains a topical area of ecological research and is largely unknown in oligotrophic high-latitude lakes. We analyzed food-web structure and resource use by a generalist top predator, the Arctic charr Salvelinus alpinus (L.), in 17 oligotrophic subarctic lakes covering a marked gradient in size (0.5–1084 km(2)) and fish species richness (2–13 species). We expected top predators to shift from littoral to pelagic energy sources with increasing lake size, as the availability of pelagic prey resources and the competition for littoral prey are both likely to be higher in large lakes with multispecies fish communities. We also expected top predators to occupy a higher trophic position in lakes with greater fish species richness due to potential substitution of intermediate consumers (prey fish) and increased piscivory by top predators. Based on stable carbon and nitrogen isotope analyses, the mean reliance of Arctic charr on littoral energy sources showed a significant negative relationship with lake surface area, whereas the mean trophic position of Arctic charr, reflecting the lake food-chain length, increased with fish species richness. These results were supported by stomach contents data demonstrating a shift of Arctic charr from an invertebrate-dominated diet to piscivory on pelagic fish. Our study highlights that, because they determine the main energy source (littoral vs. pelagic) and the trophic position of generalist top predators, ecosystem size and fish diversity are particularly important factors influencing function and structure of food webs in high-latitude lakes. BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2015-04 2015-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4409414/ /pubmed/25937909 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1464 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Eloranta, Antti P
Kahilainen, Kimmo K
Amundsen, Per-Arne
Knudsen, Rune
Harrod, Chris
Jones, Roger I
Lake size and fish diversity determine resource use and trophic position of a top predator in high-latitude lakes
title Lake size and fish diversity determine resource use and trophic position of a top predator in high-latitude lakes
title_full Lake size and fish diversity determine resource use and trophic position of a top predator in high-latitude lakes
title_fullStr Lake size and fish diversity determine resource use and trophic position of a top predator in high-latitude lakes
title_full_unstemmed Lake size and fish diversity determine resource use and trophic position of a top predator in high-latitude lakes
title_short Lake size and fish diversity determine resource use and trophic position of a top predator in high-latitude lakes
title_sort lake size and fish diversity determine resource use and trophic position of a top predator in high-latitude lakes
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4409414/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25937909
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1464
work_keys_str_mv AT elorantaanttip lakesizeandfishdiversitydetermineresourceuseandtrophicpositionofatoppredatorinhighlatitudelakes
AT kahilainenkimmok lakesizeandfishdiversitydetermineresourceuseandtrophicpositionofatoppredatorinhighlatitudelakes
AT amundsenperarne lakesizeandfishdiversitydetermineresourceuseandtrophicpositionofatoppredatorinhighlatitudelakes
AT knudsenrune lakesizeandfishdiversitydetermineresourceuseandtrophicpositionofatoppredatorinhighlatitudelakes
AT harrodchris lakesizeandfishdiversitydetermineresourceuseandtrophicpositionofatoppredatorinhighlatitudelakes
AT jonesrogeri lakesizeandfishdiversitydetermineresourceuseandtrophicpositionofatoppredatorinhighlatitudelakes