Cargando…

Can severe aortic stenosis be identified by emergency physicians when interpreting a simplified two-view echocardiogram obtained by trained echocardiographers?

BACKGROUND: Aortic stenosis (AS) is a common valve problem that causes significant morbidity and mortality. The goal of this study was to determine whether an emergency physician (EP) could determine severe AS by reviewing only two B-mode echocardiographic views (parasternal long axis (PSLA) and par...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alzahrani, Hasan, Woo, Michael Y, Johnson, Chris, Pageau, Paul, Millington, Scott, Thiruganasambandamoorthy, Venkatesh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Milan 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4409610/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25932319
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13089-015-0022-8
_version_ 1782368211263553536
author Alzahrani, Hasan
Woo, Michael Y
Johnson, Chris
Pageau, Paul
Millington, Scott
Thiruganasambandamoorthy, Venkatesh
author_facet Alzahrani, Hasan
Woo, Michael Y
Johnson, Chris
Pageau, Paul
Millington, Scott
Thiruganasambandamoorthy, Venkatesh
author_sort Alzahrani, Hasan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Aortic stenosis (AS) is a common valve problem that causes significant morbidity and mortality. The goal of this study was to determine whether an emergency physician (EP) could determine severe AS by reviewing only two B-mode echocardiographic views (parasternal long axis (PSLA) and parasternal short axis (PSSA)) obtained by trained echocardiographers. METHODS: A convenience sample of 60 patients with no AS, mild/moderate AS or severe AS was selected for health record and echocardiogram review. The echocardiograms were performed in an accredited echocardiography laboratory. An EP blinded to the cardiologist’s final report reviewed the PSLA and PSSA views after the cases were randomly sorted. Severe AS was defined as no cusp movement seen by the EP reviewers. A second EP independently reviewed 25% of randomly selected patients for inter-rater reliability. Collected data included patient demographics, EP interpretation and details of each echo view (quality, the number of cusps visualized, presence of calcification) and compared to final cardiology reports. Analyses included descriptive statistics, test characteristics for severe AS and kappa for agreement. RESULTS: The mean age was 75.3 years (range 18 to 90) with 36.7% females. The cardiologist’s diagnosis was as follows: 38.3% severe AS, 28.3% mild/moderate AS and 33.3% no AS. The PSSA view was poorer in quality compared with the PSLA (33.3% vs. 13.3%, p = 0.02), but the PSSA view was better than PSLA to visualize all three cusps (83.3% vs. 0%, p = 0.001). There was no difference in the presence of calcification between the mild/moderate and severe AS groups (94.1% vs. 100.0%, p = 0.46). The sensitivity and specificity for EP diagnosis of severe AS was 75.0% (95% CI 56.7% to 85.4%) and 92.5% (83.3% to 97.7%). The kappa for severe AS was 0.69 (0.41 to 0.85), and there was no significant difference between observers in the quality of the view, presence of aortic calcification and the number of cusps visible. CONCLUSIONS: PSLA and PSSA views obtained by trained echocardiographers can be interpreted by an EP with appropriate training to identify severe AS with good specificity. Further larger prospective studies are required before widespread use by EPs. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13089-015-0022-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4409610
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer Milan
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44096102015-04-30 Can severe aortic stenosis be identified by emergency physicians when interpreting a simplified two-view echocardiogram obtained by trained echocardiographers? Alzahrani, Hasan Woo, Michael Y Johnson, Chris Pageau, Paul Millington, Scott Thiruganasambandamoorthy, Venkatesh Crit Ultrasound J Original Article BACKGROUND: Aortic stenosis (AS) is a common valve problem that causes significant morbidity and mortality. The goal of this study was to determine whether an emergency physician (EP) could determine severe AS by reviewing only two B-mode echocardiographic views (parasternal long axis (PSLA) and parasternal short axis (PSSA)) obtained by trained echocardiographers. METHODS: A convenience sample of 60 patients with no AS, mild/moderate AS or severe AS was selected for health record and echocardiogram review. The echocardiograms were performed in an accredited echocardiography laboratory. An EP blinded to the cardiologist’s final report reviewed the PSLA and PSSA views after the cases were randomly sorted. Severe AS was defined as no cusp movement seen by the EP reviewers. A second EP independently reviewed 25% of randomly selected patients for inter-rater reliability. Collected data included patient demographics, EP interpretation and details of each echo view (quality, the number of cusps visualized, presence of calcification) and compared to final cardiology reports. Analyses included descriptive statistics, test characteristics for severe AS and kappa for agreement. RESULTS: The mean age was 75.3 years (range 18 to 90) with 36.7% females. The cardiologist’s diagnosis was as follows: 38.3% severe AS, 28.3% mild/moderate AS and 33.3% no AS. The PSSA view was poorer in quality compared with the PSLA (33.3% vs. 13.3%, p = 0.02), but the PSSA view was better than PSLA to visualize all three cusps (83.3% vs. 0%, p = 0.001). There was no difference in the presence of calcification between the mild/moderate and severe AS groups (94.1% vs. 100.0%, p = 0.46). The sensitivity and specificity for EP diagnosis of severe AS was 75.0% (95% CI 56.7% to 85.4%) and 92.5% (83.3% to 97.7%). The kappa for severe AS was 0.69 (0.41 to 0.85), and there was no significant difference between observers in the quality of the view, presence of aortic calcification and the number of cusps visible. CONCLUSIONS: PSLA and PSSA views obtained by trained echocardiographers can be interpreted by an EP with appropriate training to identify severe AS with good specificity. Further larger prospective studies are required before widespread use by EPs. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13089-015-0022-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Milan 2015-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4409610/ /pubmed/25932319 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13089-015-0022-8 Text en © Alzahrani et al.; licensee Springer. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Alzahrani, Hasan
Woo, Michael Y
Johnson, Chris
Pageau, Paul
Millington, Scott
Thiruganasambandamoorthy, Venkatesh
Can severe aortic stenosis be identified by emergency physicians when interpreting a simplified two-view echocardiogram obtained by trained echocardiographers?
title Can severe aortic stenosis be identified by emergency physicians when interpreting a simplified two-view echocardiogram obtained by trained echocardiographers?
title_full Can severe aortic stenosis be identified by emergency physicians when interpreting a simplified two-view echocardiogram obtained by trained echocardiographers?
title_fullStr Can severe aortic stenosis be identified by emergency physicians when interpreting a simplified two-view echocardiogram obtained by trained echocardiographers?
title_full_unstemmed Can severe aortic stenosis be identified by emergency physicians when interpreting a simplified two-view echocardiogram obtained by trained echocardiographers?
title_short Can severe aortic stenosis be identified by emergency physicians when interpreting a simplified two-view echocardiogram obtained by trained echocardiographers?
title_sort can severe aortic stenosis be identified by emergency physicians when interpreting a simplified two-view echocardiogram obtained by trained echocardiographers?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4409610/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25932319
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13089-015-0022-8
work_keys_str_mv AT alzahranihasan cansevereaorticstenosisbeidentifiedbyemergencyphysicianswheninterpretingasimplifiedtwoviewechocardiogramobtainedbytrainedechocardiographers
AT woomichaely cansevereaorticstenosisbeidentifiedbyemergencyphysicianswheninterpretingasimplifiedtwoviewechocardiogramobtainedbytrainedechocardiographers
AT johnsonchris cansevereaorticstenosisbeidentifiedbyemergencyphysicianswheninterpretingasimplifiedtwoviewechocardiogramobtainedbytrainedechocardiographers
AT pageaupaul cansevereaorticstenosisbeidentifiedbyemergencyphysicianswheninterpretingasimplifiedtwoviewechocardiogramobtainedbytrainedechocardiographers
AT millingtonscott cansevereaorticstenosisbeidentifiedbyemergencyphysicianswheninterpretingasimplifiedtwoviewechocardiogramobtainedbytrainedechocardiographers
AT thiruganasambandamoorthyvenkatesh cansevereaorticstenosisbeidentifiedbyemergencyphysicianswheninterpretingasimplifiedtwoviewechocardiogramobtainedbytrainedechocardiographers