Cargando…

Reliability of pain intensity clamping using response-dependent thermal stimulation in healthy volunteers

BACKGROUND: Pain intensity clamping uses the REsponse-Dependent Stimulation (REDSTIM) methodology to automatically adjust stimulus intensity to maintain a desired pain rating set-point which is continuously monitored from a subject’s real-time pain ratings. REDSTIM blinds subjects regarding the pain...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cruz-Almeida, Yenisel, Naugle, Kelly M, Vierck, Charles J, Fillingim, Roger B, Riley, Joseph L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4409722/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25909597
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12868-015-0164-4
_version_ 1782368223651430400
author Cruz-Almeida, Yenisel
Naugle, Kelly M
Vierck, Charles J
Fillingim, Roger B
Riley, Joseph L
author_facet Cruz-Almeida, Yenisel
Naugle, Kelly M
Vierck, Charles J
Fillingim, Roger B
Riley, Joseph L
author_sort Cruz-Almeida, Yenisel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pain intensity clamping uses the REsponse-Dependent Stimulation (REDSTIM) methodology to automatically adjust stimulus intensity to maintain a desired pain rating set-point which is continuously monitored from a subject’s real-time pain ratings. REDSTIM blinds subjects regarding the pain intensity set-point, supporting its use for assessing intervention efficacy. By maintaining the pain intensity at a constant level, a potential decrease in pain sensitivity can be detected by an increase in thermode temperature (unknown to the subject) and not by pain ratings alone. Further, previously described sensitizing and desensitizing trends within REDSTIM provide a novel insight into human pain mechanisms overcoming limitations of conventional testing methods. The purpose of the present study was to assess the test-retest reliability of pain intensity clamping using REDSTIM during three separate sessions. METHODS: We used a method for testing changes in pain sensitivity of human subjects (REDSTIM) where the stimulus temperature is modulated to clamp pain intensity near a desired set-point. Temperature serves as the response variable and is used to infer pain sensitivity. Several measures were analyzed for reliability including average temperature and area under the curve (AUC). Intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated for each measure at pain rating set-points of 20/100 and 35/100. RESULTS: Sixteen healthy individuals (mean age = 21.6 ± 3.9) participated in three experiments two days apart at both pain rating set-points. Most reliability coefficients were in the moderate to substantial range (r’s = 0.79 to 0.94) except for the negative AUC (r = 0.52), but only at the 20/100 pain rating set-point. CONCLUSIONS: The present study supports the test-retest reliability of pain intensity clamping using the REDSTIM methodology while providing a novel tool to examine human pain modulatory mechanisms and overcoming common shortcomings of conventional quantitative sensory testing methods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4409722
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44097222015-04-26 Reliability of pain intensity clamping using response-dependent thermal stimulation in healthy volunteers Cruz-Almeida, Yenisel Naugle, Kelly M Vierck, Charles J Fillingim, Roger B Riley, Joseph L BMC Neurosci Methodology Article BACKGROUND: Pain intensity clamping uses the REsponse-Dependent Stimulation (REDSTIM) methodology to automatically adjust stimulus intensity to maintain a desired pain rating set-point which is continuously monitored from a subject’s real-time pain ratings. REDSTIM blinds subjects regarding the pain intensity set-point, supporting its use for assessing intervention efficacy. By maintaining the pain intensity at a constant level, a potential decrease in pain sensitivity can be detected by an increase in thermode temperature (unknown to the subject) and not by pain ratings alone. Further, previously described sensitizing and desensitizing trends within REDSTIM provide a novel insight into human pain mechanisms overcoming limitations of conventional testing methods. The purpose of the present study was to assess the test-retest reliability of pain intensity clamping using REDSTIM during three separate sessions. METHODS: We used a method for testing changes in pain sensitivity of human subjects (REDSTIM) where the stimulus temperature is modulated to clamp pain intensity near a desired set-point. Temperature serves as the response variable and is used to infer pain sensitivity. Several measures were analyzed for reliability including average temperature and area under the curve (AUC). Intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated for each measure at pain rating set-points of 20/100 and 35/100. RESULTS: Sixteen healthy individuals (mean age = 21.6 ± 3.9) participated in three experiments two days apart at both pain rating set-points. Most reliability coefficients were in the moderate to substantial range (r’s = 0.79 to 0.94) except for the negative AUC (r = 0.52), but only at the 20/100 pain rating set-point. CONCLUSIONS: The present study supports the test-retest reliability of pain intensity clamping using the REDSTIM methodology while providing a novel tool to examine human pain modulatory mechanisms and overcoming common shortcomings of conventional quantitative sensory testing methods. BioMed Central 2015-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4409722/ /pubmed/25909597 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12868-015-0164-4 Text en © Cruz-Almeida et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Methodology Article
Cruz-Almeida, Yenisel
Naugle, Kelly M
Vierck, Charles J
Fillingim, Roger B
Riley, Joseph L
Reliability of pain intensity clamping using response-dependent thermal stimulation in healthy volunteers
title Reliability of pain intensity clamping using response-dependent thermal stimulation in healthy volunteers
title_full Reliability of pain intensity clamping using response-dependent thermal stimulation in healthy volunteers
title_fullStr Reliability of pain intensity clamping using response-dependent thermal stimulation in healthy volunteers
title_full_unstemmed Reliability of pain intensity clamping using response-dependent thermal stimulation in healthy volunteers
title_short Reliability of pain intensity clamping using response-dependent thermal stimulation in healthy volunteers
title_sort reliability of pain intensity clamping using response-dependent thermal stimulation in healthy volunteers
topic Methodology Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4409722/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25909597
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12868-015-0164-4
work_keys_str_mv AT cruzalmeidayenisel reliabilityofpainintensityclampingusingresponsedependentthermalstimulationinhealthyvolunteers
AT nauglekellym reliabilityofpainintensityclampingusingresponsedependentthermalstimulationinhealthyvolunteers
AT vierckcharlesj reliabilityofpainintensityclampingusingresponsedependentthermalstimulationinhealthyvolunteers
AT fillingimrogerb reliabilityofpainintensityclampingusingresponsedependentthermalstimulationinhealthyvolunteers
AT rileyjosephl reliabilityofpainintensityclampingusingresponsedependentthermalstimulationinhealthyvolunteers