Cargando…

Comparative effectiveness of budesonide/formoterol combination and fluticasone/salmeterol combination among chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients new to controller treatment: a US administrative claims database study

BACKGROUND: Inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β(2)-agonist combinations (ICS/LABA) have emerged as first line therapies for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients with exacerbation history. No randomized clinical trial has compared exacerbation rates among COPD patients receiving bud...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kern, David M, Davis, Jill, Williams, Setareh A, Tunceli, Ozgur, Wu, Bingcao, Hollis, Sally, Strange, Charlie, Trudo, Frank
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4409772/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25899176
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-015-0210-x
_version_ 1782368234606952448
author Kern, David M
Davis, Jill
Williams, Setareh A
Tunceli, Ozgur
Wu, Bingcao
Hollis, Sally
Strange, Charlie
Trudo, Frank
author_facet Kern, David M
Davis, Jill
Williams, Setareh A
Tunceli, Ozgur
Wu, Bingcao
Hollis, Sally
Strange, Charlie
Trudo, Frank
author_sort Kern, David M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β(2)-agonist combinations (ICS/LABA) have emerged as first line therapies for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients with exacerbation history. No randomized clinical trial has compared exacerbation rates among COPD patients receiving budesonide/formoterol combination (BFC) and fluticasone/salmeterol combination (FSC) to date, and only limited comparative data are available. This study compared the real-world effectiveness of approved BFC and FSC treatments among matched cohorts of COPD patients in a large US managed care setting. METHODS: COPD patients (≥40 years) naive to ICS/LABA who initiated BFC or FSC treatments between 03/01/2009-03/31/2012 were identified in a geographically diverse US managed care database and followed for 12 months; index date was defined as first prescription fill date. Patients with a cancer diagnosis or chronic (≥180 days) oral corticosteroid (OCS) use within 12 months prior to index were excluded. Patients were matched 1-to-1 on demographic and pre-initiation clinical characteristics using propensity scores from a random forest model. The primary efficacy outcome was COPD exacerbation rate, and secondary efficacy outcomes included exacerbation rates by event type and healthcare resource utilization. Pneumonia objectives included rates of any diagnosis of pneumonia and pneumonia-related healthcare resource utilization. RESULTS: Matching of the identified 3,788 BFC and 6,439 FSC patients resulted in 3,697 patients in each group. Matched patients were well balanced on age (mean = 64 years), gender (BFC: 52% female; FSC: 54%), prior COPD-related medication use, healthcare utilization, and comorbid conditions. During follow-up, no significant difference was seen between BFC and FSC patients for number of COPD-related exacerbations overall (rate ratio [RR] = 1.02, 95% CI = [0.96,1.09], p = 0.56) or by event type: COPD-related hospitalizations (RR = 0.96), COPD-related ED visits (RR = 1.11), and COPD-related office/outpatient visits with OCS and/or antibiotic use (RR = 1.01). The proportion of patients diagnosed with pneumonia during the post-index period was similar for patients in each group (BFC = 17.3%, FSC = 19.0%, odds ratio = 0.92 [0.81,1.04], p = 0.19), and no difference was detected for pneumonia-related healthcare utilization by place of service. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated no difference in COPD-related exacerbations or pneumonia events between BFC and FSC treatment groups for patients new to ICS/LABA treatment in a real-world setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01921127.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4409772
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44097722015-04-26 Comparative effectiveness of budesonide/formoterol combination and fluticasone/salmeterol combination among chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients new to controller treatment: a US administrative claims database study Kern, David M Davis, Jill Williams, Setareh A Tunceli, Ozgur Wu, Bingcao Hollis, Sally Strange, Charlie Trudo, Frank Respir Res Research BACKGROUND: Inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β(2)-agonist combinations (ICS/LABA) have emerged as first line therapies for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients with exacerbation history. No randomized clinical trial has compared exacerbation rates among COPD patients receiving budesonide/formoterol combination (BFC) and fluticasone/salmeterol combination (FSC) to date, and only limited comparative data are available. This study compared the real-world effectiveness of approved BFC and FSC treatments among matched cohorts of COPD patients in a large US managed care setting. METHODS: COPD patients (≥40 years) naive to ICS/LABA who initiated BFC or FSC treatments between 03/01/2009-03/31/2012 were identified in a geographically diverse US managed care database and followed for 12 months; index date was defined as first prescription fill date. Patients with a cancer diagnosis or chronic (≥180 days) oral corticosteroid (OCS) use within 12 months prior to index were excluded. Patients were matched 1-to-1 on demographic and pre-initiation clinical characteristics using propensity scores from a random forest model. The primary efficacy outcome was COPD exacerbation rate, and secondary efficacy outcomes included exacerbation rates by event type and healthcare resource utilization. Pneumonia objectives included rates of any diagnosis of pneumonia and pneumonia-related healthcare resource utilization. RESULTS: Matching of the identified 3,788 BFC and 6,439 FSC patients resulted in 3,697 patients in each group. Matched patients were well balanced on age (mean = 64 years), gender (BFC: 52% female; FSC: 54%), prior COPD-related medication use, healthcare utilization, and comorbid conditions. During follow-up, no significant difference was seen between BFC and FSC patients for number of COPD-related exacerbations overall (rate ratio [RR] = 1.02, 95% CI = [0.96,1.09], p = 0.56) or by event type: COPD-related hospitalizations (RR = 0.96), COPD-related ED visits (RR = 1.11), and COPD-related office/outpatient visits with OCS and/or antibiotic use (RR = 1.01). The proportion of patients diagnosed with pneumonia during the post-index period was similar for patients in each group (BFC = 17.3%, FSC = 19.0%, odds ratio = 0.92 [0.81,1.04], p = 0.19), and no difference was detected for pneumonia-related healthcare utilization by place of service. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated no difference in COPD-related exacerbations or pneumonia events between BFC and FSC treatment groups for patients new to ICS/LABA treatment in a real-world setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01921127. BioMed Central 2015-04-23 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4409772/ /pubmed/25899176 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-015-0210-x Text en © Kern et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Kern, David M
Davis, Jill
Williams, Setareh A
Tunceli, Ozgur
Wu, Bingcao
Hollis, Sally
Strange, Charlie
Trudo, Frank
Comparative effectiveness of budesonide/formoterol combination and fluticasone/salmeterol combination among chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients new to controller treatment: a US administrative claims database study
title Comparative effectiveness of budesonide/formoterol combination and fluticasone/salmeterol combination among chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients new to controller treatment: a US administrative claims database study
title_full Comparative effectiveness of budesonide/formoterol combination and fluticasone/salmeterol combination among chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients new to controller treatment: a US administrative claims database study
title_fullStr Comparative effectiveness of budesonide/formoterol combination and fluticasone/salmeterol combination among chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients new to controller treatment: a US administrative claims database study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative effectiveness of budesonide/formoterol combination and fluticasone/salmeterol combination among chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients new to controller treatment: a US administrative claims database study
title_short Comparative effectiveness of budesonide/formoterol combination and fluticasone/salmeterol combination among chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients new to controller treatment: a US administrative claims database study
title_sort comparative effectiveness of budesonide/formoterol combination and fluticasone/salmeterol combination among chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients new to controller treatment: a us administrative claims database study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4409772/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25899176
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-015-0210-x
work_keys_str_mv AT kerndavidm comparativeeffectivenessofbudesonideformoterolcombinationandfluticasonesalmeterolcombinationamongchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasepatientsnewtocontrollertreatmentausadministrativeclaimsdatabasestudy
AT davisjill comparativeeffectivenessofbudesonideformoterolcombinationandfluticasonesalmeterolcombinationamongchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasepatientsnewtocontrollertreatmentausadministrativeclaimsdatabasestudy
AT williamssetareha comparativeeffectivenessofbudesonideformoterolcombinationandfluticasonesalmeterolcombinationamongchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasepatientsnewtocontrollertreatmentausadministrativeclaimsdatabasestudy
AT tunceliozgur comparativeeffectivenessofbudesonideformoterolcombinationandfluticasonesalmeterolcombinationamongchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasepatientsnewtocontrollertreatmentausadministrativeclaimsdatabasestudy
AT wubingcao comparativeeffectivenessofbudesonideformoterolcombinationandfluticasonesalmeterolcombinationamongchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasepatientsnewtocontrollertreatmentausadministrativeclaimsdatabasestudy
AT hollissally comparativeeffectivenessofbudesonideformoterolcombinationandfluticasonesalmeterolcombinationamongchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasepatientsnewtocontrollertreatmentausadministrativeclaimsdatabasestudy
AT strangecharlie comparativeeffectivenessofbudesonideformoterolcombinationandfluticasonesalmeterolcombinationamongchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasepatientsnewtocontrollertreatmentausadministrativeclaimsdatabasestudy
AT trudofrank comparativeeffectivenessofbudesonideformoterolcombinationandfluticasonesalmeterolcombinationamongchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasepatientsnewtocontrollertreatmentausadministrativeclaimsdatabasestudy