Cargando…
In Situ Sediment Treatment Using Activated Carbon: A Demonstrated Sediment Cleanup Technology
This paper reviews general approaches for applying activated carbon (AC) amendments as an in situ sediment treatment remedy. In situ sediment treatment involves targeted placement of amendments using installation options that fall into two general approaches: 1) directly applying a thin layer of ame...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BlackWell Publishing Ltd
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4409844/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25323491 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ieam.1589 |
_version_ | 1782368247912333312 |
---|---|
author | Patmont, Clayton R Ghosh, Upal LaRosa, Paul Menzie, Charles A Luthy, Richard G Greenberg, Marc S Cornelissen, Gerard Eek, Espen Collins, John Hull, John Hjartland, Tore Glaza, Edward Bleiler, John Quadrini, James |
author_facet | Patmont, Clayton R Ghosh, Upal LaRosa, Paul Menzie, Charles A Luthy, Richard G Greenberg, Marc S Cornelissen, Gerard Eek, Espen Collins, John Hull, John Hjartland, Tore Glaza, Edward Bleiler, John Quadrini, James |
author_sort | Patmont, Clayton R |
collection | PubMed |
description | This paper reviews general approaches for applying activated carbon (AC) amendments as an in situ sediment treatment remedy. In situ sediment treatment involves targeted placement of amendments using installation options that fall into two general approaches: 1) directly applying a thin layer of amendments (which potentially incorporates weighting or binding materials) to surface sediment, with or without initial mixing; and 2) incorporating amendments into a premixed, blended cover material of clean sand or sediment, which is also applied to the sediment surface. Over the past decade, pilot- or full-scale field sediment treatment projects using AC—globally recognized as one of the most effective sorbents for organic contaminants—were completed or were underway at more than 25 field sites in the United States, Norway, and the Netherlands. Collectively, these field projects (along with numerous laboratory experiments) have demonstrated the efficacy of AC for in situ treatment in a range of contaminated sediment conditions. Results from experimental studies and field applications indicate that in situ sequestration and immobilization treatment of hydrophobic organic compounds using either installation approach can reduce porewater concentrations and biouptake significantly, often becoming more effective over time due to progressive mass transfer. Certain conditions, such as use in unstable sediment environments, should be taken into account to maximize AC effectiveness over long time periods. In situ treatment is generally less disruptive and less expensive than traditional sediment cleanup technologies such as dredging or isolation capping. Proper site-specific balancing of the potential benefits, risks, ecological effects, and costs of in situ treatment technologies (in this case, AC) relative to other sediment cleanup technologies is important to successful full-scale field application. Extensive experimental studies and field trials have shown that when applied correctly, in situ treatment via contaminant sequestration and immobilization using a sorbent material such as AC has progressed from an innovative sediment remediation approach to a proven, reliable technology. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2015; 11:195–207. © 2014 The Authors. Published 2014 SETAC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4409844 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BlackWell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44098442015-04-29 In Situ Sediment Treatment Using Activated Carbon: A Demonstrated Sediment Cleanup Technology Patmont, Clayton R Ghosh, Upal LaRosa, Paul Menzie, Charles A Luthy, Richard G Greenberg, Marc S Cornelissen, Gerard Eek, Espen Collins, John Hull, John Hjartland, Tore Glaza, Edward Bleiler, John Quadrini, James Integr Environ Assess Manag Critical Review This paper reviews general approaches for applying activated carbon (AC) amendments as an in situ sediment treatment remedy. In situ sediment treatment involves targeted placement of amendments using installation options that fall into two general approaches: 1) directly applying a thin layer of amendments (which potentially incorporates weighting or binding materials) to surface sediment, with or without initial mixing; and 2) incorporating amendments into a premixed, blended cover material of clean sand or sediment, which is also applied to the sediment surface. Over the past decade, pilot- or full-scale field sediment treatment projects using AC—globally recognized as one of the most effective sorbents for organic contaminants—were completed or were underway at more than 25 field sites in the United States, Norway, and the Netherlands. Collectively, these field projects (along with numerous laboratory experiments) have demonstrated the efficacy of AC for in situ treatment in a range of contaminated sediment conditions. Results from experimental studies and field applications indicate that in situ sequestration and immobilization treatment of hydrophobic organic compounds using either installation approach can reduce porewater concentrations and biouptake significantly, often becoming more effective over time due to progressive mass transfer. Certain conditions, such as use in unstable sediment environments, should be taken into account to maximize AC effectiveness over long time periods. In situ treatment is generally less disruptive and less expensive than traditional sediment cleanup technologies such as dredging or isolation capping. Proper site-specific balancing of the potential benefits, risks, ecological effects, and costs of in situ treatment technologies (in this case, AC) relative to other sediment cleanup technologies is important to successful full-scale field application. Extensive experimental studies and field trials have shown that when applied correctly, in situ treatment via contaminant sequestration and immobilization using a sorbent material such as AC has progressed from an innovative sediment remediation approach to a proven, reliable technology. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2015; 11:195–207. © 2014 The Authors. Published 2014 SETAC. BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2015-04 2015-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4409844/ /pubmed/25323491 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ieam.1589 Text en © 2014 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of SETAC. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Critical Review Patmont, Clayton R Ghosh, Upal LaRosa, Paul Menzie, Charles A Luthy, Richard G Greenberg, Marc S Cornelissen, Gerard Eek, Espen Collins, John Hull, John Hjartland, Tore Glaza, Edward Bleiler, John Quadrini, James In Situ Sediment Treatment Using Activated Carbon: A Demonstrated Sediment Cleanup Technology |
title | In Situ Sediment Treatment Using Activated Carbon: A Demonstrated Sediment Cleanup Technology |
title_full | In Situ Sediment Treatment Using Activated Carbon: A Demonstrated Sediment Cleanup Technology |
title_fullStr | In Situ Sediment Treatment Using Activated Carbon: A Demonstrated Sediment Cleanup Technology |
title_full_unstemmed | In Situ Sediment Treatment Using Activated Carbon: A Demonstrated Sediment Cleanup Technology |
title_short | In Situ Sediment Treatment Using Activated Carbon: A Demonstrated Sediment Cleanup Technology |
title_sort | in situ sediment treatment using activated carbon: a demonstrated sediment cleanup technology |
topic | Critical Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4409844/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25323491 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ieam.1589 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT patmontclaytonr insitusedimenttreatmentusingactivatedcarbonademonstratedsedimentcleanuptechnology AT ghoshupal insitusedimenttreatmentusingactivatedcarbonademonstratedsedimentcleanuptechnology AT larosapaul insitusedimenttreatmentusingactivatedcarbonademonstratedsedimentcleanuptechnology AT menziecharlesa insitusedimenttreatmentusingactivatedcarbonademonstratedsedimentcleanuptechnology AT luthyrichardg insitusedimenttreatmentusingactivatedcarbonademonstratedsedimentcleanuptechnology AT greenbergmarcs insitusedimenttreatmentusingactivatedcarbonademonstratedsedimentcleanuptechnology AT cornelissengerard insitusedimenttreatmentusingactivatedcarbonademonstratedsedimentcleanuptechnology AT eekespen insitusedimenttreatmentusingactivatedcarbonademonstratedsedimentcleanuptechnology AT collinsjohn insitusedimenttreatmentusingactivatedcarbonademonstratedsedimentcleanuptechnology AT hulljohn insitusedimenttreatmentusingactivatedcarbonademonstratedsedimentcleanuptechnology AT hjartlandtore insitusedimenttreatmentusingactivatedcarbonademonstratedsedimentcleanuptechnology AT glazaedward insitusedimenttreatmentusingactivatedcarbonademonstratedsedimentcleanuptechnology AT bleilerjohn insitusedimenttreatmentusingactivatedcarbonademonstratedsedimentcleanuptechnology AT quadrinijames insitusedimenttreatmentusingactivatedcarbonademonstratedsedimentcleanuptechnology |