Cargando…

First medical contact in patients with STEMI and its impact on time to diagnosis; an explorative cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE: It is unknown into what extent patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) utilise a joint service number (Swedish Healthcare Direct, SHD) as first medical contact (FMC) instead of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) and how this impact time to diagnosis. We aimed to (1) describ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thylén, Ingela, Ericsson, Maria, Hellström Ängerud, Karin, Isaksson, Rose-Marie, Sederholm Lawesson, Sofia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4410112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25900460
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007059
_version_ 1782368272469983232
author Thylén, Ingela
Ericsson, Maria
Hellström Ängerud, Karin
Isaksson, Rose-Marie
Sederholm Lawesson, Sofia
author_facet Thylén, Ingela
Ericsson, Maria
Hellström Ängerud, Karin
Isaksson, Rose-Marie
Sederholm Lawesson, Sofia
author_sort Thylén, Ingela
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: It is unknown into what extent patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) utilise a joint service number (Swedish Healthcare Direct, SHD) as first medical contact (FMC) instead of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) and how this impact time to diagnosis. We aimed to (1) describe patients’ FMC; (2) find explanatory factors influencing their FMC (ie, EMS and SHD) and (3) explore the time interval from symptom onset to diagnosis. SETTING: Multicentred study, Sweden. METHODS: Cross-sectional, enrolling patients with consecutive STEMI admitted within 24 h from admission. RESULTS: We included 109 women and 336 men (mean age 66±11 years). Although 83% arrived by ambulance to the hospital, just half of the patients (51%) called EMS as their FMC. Other utilised SHD (21%), contacted their primary healthcare centre (14%), or went directly to the emergency room (14%). Reasons for not contacting EMS were predominantly; (1) my transport mode was faster (40%), (2) did not consider myself sick enough (30%), and (3) it was easier to be driven or taking a taxi (25%). Predictors associated with contacting SHD as FMC were female gender (OR 1.92), higher education (OR 2.40), history of diabetes (OR 2.10), pain in throat/neck (OR 2.24) and pain intensity (OR 0.85). Predictors associated with contacting EMS as FMC were history of MI (OR 2.18), atrial fibrillation (OR 3.81), abdominal pain (OR 0.35) and believing the symptoms originating from the heart (OR 1.60). Symptom onset to diagnosis time was significantly longer when turning to the SHD instead of the EMS as FMC (1:59 vs 1:21 h, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Using other forms of contacts than EMS, significantly prolong delay times, and could adversely affect patient prognosis. Nevertheless, having the opportunity to call the SHD might also, in some instances, lower the threshold for taking contact with the healthcare system, and thus lowers the number that would otherwise have delayed even longer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4410112
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44101122015-05-01 First medical contact in patients with STEMI and its impact on time to diagnosis; an explorative cross-sectional study Thylén, Ingela Ericsson, Maria Hellström Ängerud, Karin Isaksson, Rose-Marie Sederholm Lawesson, Sofia BMJ Open Cardiovascular Medicine OBJECTIVE: It is unknown into what extent patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) utilise a joint service number (Swedish Healthcare Direct, SHD) as first medical contact (FMC) instead of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) and how this impact time to diagnosis. We aimed to (1) describe patients’ FMC; (2) find explanatory factors influencing their FMC (ie, EMS and SHD) and (3) explore the time interval from symptom onset to diagnosis. SETTING: Multicentred study, Sweden. METHODS: Cross-sectional, enrolling patients with consecutive STEMI admitted within 24 h from admission. RESULTS: We included 109 women and 336 men (mean age 66±11 years). Although 83% arrived by ambulance to the hospital, just half of the patients (51%) called EMS as their FMC. Other utilised SHD (21%), contacted their primary healthcare centre (14%), or went directly to the emergency room (14%). Reasons for not contacting EMS were predominantly; (1) my transport mode was faster (40%), (2) did not consider myself sick enough (30%), and (3) it was easier to be driven or taking a taxi (25%). Predictors associated with contacting SHD as FMC were female gender (OR 1.92), higher education (OR 2.40), history of diabetes (OR 2.10), pain in throat/neck (OR 2.24) and pain intensity (OR 0.85). Predictors associated with contacting EMS as FMC were history of MI (OR 2.18), atrial fibrillation (OR 3.81), abdominal pain (OR 0.35) and believing the symptoms originating from the heart (OR 1.60). Symptom onset to diagnosis time was significantly longer when turning to the SHD instead of the EMS as FMC (1:59 vs 1:21 h, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Using other forms of contacts than EMS, significantly prolong delay times, and could adversely affect patient prognosis. Nevertheless, having the opportunity to call the SHD might also, in some instances, lower the threshold for taking contact with the healthcare system, and thus lowers the number that would otherwise have delayed even longer. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4410112/ /pubmed/25900460 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007059 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Thylén, Ingela
Ericsson, Maria
Hellström Ängerud, Karin
Isaksson, Rose-Marie
Sederholm Lawesson, Sofia
First medical contact in patients with STEMI and its impact on time to diagnosis; an explorative cross-sectional study
title First medical contact in patients with STEMI and its impact on time to diagnosis; an explorative cross-sectional study
title_full First medical contact in patients with STEMI and its impact on time to diagnosis; an explorative cross-sectional study
title_fullStr First medical contact in patients with STEMI and its impact on time to diagnosis; an explorative cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed First medical contact in patients with STEMI and its impact on time to diagnosis; an explorative cross-sectional study
title_short First medical contact in patients with STEMI and its impact on time to diagnosis; an explorative cross-sectional study
title_sort first medical contact in patients with stemi and its impact on time to diagnosis; an explorative cross-sectional study
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4410112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25900460
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007059
work_keys_str_mv AT thyleningela firstmedicalcontactinpatientswithstemianditsimpactontimetodiagnosisanexplorativecrosssectionalstudy
AT ericssonmaria firstmedicalcontactinpatientswithstemianditsimpactontimetodiagnosisanexplorativecrosssectionalstudy
AT hellstromangerudkarin firstmedicalcontactinpatientswithstemianditsimpactontimetodiagnosisanexplorativecrosssectionalstudy
AT isakssonrosemarie firstmedicalcontactinpatientswithstemianditsimpactontimetodiagnosisanexplorativecrosssectionalstudy
AT sederholmlawessonsofia firstmedicalcontactinpatientswithstemianditsimpactontimetodiagnosisanexplorativecrosssectionalstudy