Cargando…
Does a quality management system improve quality in primary care practices in Switzerland? A longitudinal study
OBJECTIVES: To examine the effectiveness of the quality management programme—European Practice Assessment—in primary care in Switzerland. DESIGN: Longitudinal study with three points of measurement. SETTING: Primary care practices in Switzerland. PARTICIPANTS: In total, 45 of 91 primary care practic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4410115/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25900466 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007443 |
_version_ | 1782368273184063488 |
---|---|
author | Goetz, Katja Hess, Sigrid Jossen, Marianne Huber, Felix Rosemann, Thomas Brodowski, Marc Künzi, Beat Szecsenyi, Joachim |
author_facet | Goetz, Katja Hess, Sigrid Jossen, Marianne Huber, Felix Rosemann, Thomas Brodowski, Marc Künzi, Beat Szecsenyi, Joachim |
author_sort | Goetz, Katja |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To examine the effectiveness of the quality management programme—European Practice Assessment—in primary care in Switzerland. DESIGN: Longitudinal study with three points of measurement. SETTING: Primary care practices in Switzerland. PARTICIPANTS: In total, 45 of 91 primary care practices completed European Practice Assessment three times. OUTCOMES: The interval between each assessment was around 36 months. A variance analyses for repeated measurements were performed for all 129 quality indicators from the domains: ‘infrastructure’, ‘information’, ‘finance’, and ‘quality and safety’ to examine changes over time. RESULTS: Significant improvements were found in three of four domains: ‘quality and safety’ (F=22.81, p<0.01), ‘information’ (F=27.901, p<0.01) and ‘finance’ (F=4.073, p<0.02). The 129 quality indicators showed a significant improvement within the three points of measurement (F=33.864, p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The European Practice Assessment for primary care practices thus provides a functioning quality management programme, focusing on the sustainable improvement of structural and organisational aspects to promote high quality of primary care. The implementation of a quality management system which also includes a continuous improvement process would give added value to provide good care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4410115 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44101152015-05-01 Does a quality management system improve quality in primary care practices in Switzerland? A longitudinal study Goetz, Katja Hess, Sigrid Jossen, Marianne Huber, Felix Rosemann, Thomas Brodowski, Marc Künzi, Beat Szecsenyi, Joachim BMJ Open General practice / Family practice OBJECTIVES: To examine the effectiveness of the quality management programme—European Practice Assessment—in primary care in Switzerland. DESIGN: Longitudinal study with three points of measurement. SETTING: Primary care practices in Switzerland. PARTICIPANTS: In total, 45 of 91 primary care practices completed European Practice Assessment three times. OUTCOMES: The interval between each assessment was around 36 months. A variance analyses for repeated measurements were performed for all 129 quality indicators from the domains: ‘infrastructure’, ‘information’, ‘finance’, and ‘quality and safety’ to examine changes over time. RESULTS: Significant improvements were found in three of four domains: ‘quality and safety’ (F=22.81, p<0.01), ‘information’ (F=27.901, p<0.01) and ‘finance’ (F=4.073, p<0.02). The 129 quality indicators showed a significant improvement within the three points of measurement (F=33.864, p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The European Practice Assessment for primary care practices thus provides a functioning quality management programme, focusing on the sustainable improvement of structural and organisational aspects to promote high quality of primary care. The implementation of a quality management system which also includes a continuous improvement process would give added value to provide good care. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4410115/ /pubmed/25900466 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007443 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | General practice / Family practice Goetz, Katja Hess, Sigrid Jossen, Marianne Huber, Felix Rosemann, Thomas Brodowski, Marc Künzi, Beat Szecsenyi, Joachim Does a quality management system improve quality in primary care practices in Switzerland? A longitudinal study |
title | Does a quality management system improve quality in primary care practices in Switzerland? A longitudinal study |
title_full | Does a quality management system improve quality in primary care practices in Switzerland? A longitudinal study |
title_fullStr | Does a quality management system improve quality in primary care practices in Switzerland? A longitudinal study |
title_full_unstemmed | Does a quality management system improve quality in primary care practices in Switzerland? A longitudinal study |
title_short | Does a quality management system improve quality in primary care practices in Switzerland? A longitudinal study |
title_sort | does a quality management system improve quality in primary care practices in switzerland? a longitudinal study |
topic | General practice / Family practice |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4410115/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25900466 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007443 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT goetzkatja doesaqualitymanagementsystemimprovequalityinprimarycarepracticesinswitzerlandalongitudinalstudy AT hesssigrid doesaqualitymanagementsystemimprovequalityinprimarycarepracticesinswitzerlandalongitudinalstudy AT jossenmarianne doesaqualitymanagementsystemimprovequalityinprimarycarepracticesinswitzerlandalongitudinalstudy AT huberfelix doesaqualitymanagementsystemimprovequalityinprimarycarepracticesinswitzerlandalongitudinalstudy AT rosemannthomas doesaqualitymanagementsystemimprovequalityinprimarycarepracticesinswitzerlandalongitudinalstudy AT brodowskimarc doesaqualitymanagementsystemimprovequalityinprimarycarepracticesinswitzerlandalongitudinalstudy AT kunzibeat doesaqualitymanagementsystemimprovequalityinprimarycarepracticesinswitzerlandalongitudinalstudy AT szecsenyijoachim doesaqualitymanagementsystemimprovequalityinprimarycarepracticesinswitzerlandalongitudinalstudy |