Cargando…
The 7-year teesside experience of primary prevention ICD indications following primary PCI (PPCI) and the potential impact of a change in NICE guidance
INTRODUCTION: The recovery of LV function in patients with severe LV impairment in the acute phase following primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) is not well established. The indication for a primary prevention ICD post-STEMI is dependent on which screening guidance, NICE or ESC, is fol...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4410140/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25932332 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2014-000153 |
_version_ | 1782368278986883072 |
---|---|
author | Phan, Thanh Trung Khan, Saima Mahmood, Muhammad Muzaffar Mani, Sudha Wadehra, Vineet de Belder, Mark Thornley, Andrew James, Simon Linker, Nicholas J Turley, Andrew J |
author_facet | Phan, Thanh Trung Khan, Saima Mahmood, Muhammad Muzaffar Mani, Sudha Wadehra, Vineet de Belder, Mark Thornley, Andrew James, Simon Linker, Nicholas J Turley, Andrew J |
author_sort | Phan, Thanh Trung |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The recovery of LV function in patients with severe LV impairment in the acute phase following primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) is not well established. The indication for a primary prevention ICD post-STEMI is dependent on which screening guidance, NICE or ESC, is followed. The potential impact of the new NICE guidance is estimated. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients presenting with a STEMI over a 7-year period (2005–2012) treated with PPCI to determine in-hospital mortality, LV function at index presentation, at 3 months and the predicted primary prevention ICD implantation rate using NICE (TA095) and ESC 2006 guidelines. Predicted implant rates using the new NICE guidance (TA314) and actual implantation rates were also assessed. RESULTS: 3902 patients with a mean age of 65±13 years underwent PPCI. Of those patients surviving until discharge, 332 (10%) had LVEF ≤35%. 254 of 332 patients (76%) with a severely impaired ventricle were followed up at participating centres. 210 of 254 (83%) patients had a repeat echocardiogram within 3 months post-MI; among these patients, 89 (42%) remained to have LVEF ≤35%. The number of patients fulfilling NICE and ESC criteria for primary prevention ICD implantation was 14 (16%) and 84 (94%), respectively. The actual number of patients receiving an ICD was 17 (19%). The number of patients fulfilling the new NICE (TA314) guidance was 84 (94%). CONCLUSIONS: A small proportion of patients with STEMIs undergoing PPCI have a severely impaired LV systolic function. A large proportion of these patients will have improved LV systolic function at 3 months. There is a five-fold difference in the predicted ICD implantation rates depending on which guidance is followed—NICE versus ESC. The potential impact of the new NICE (TA314) guidance on ICD implantation will be a significant increase in ICD implantation rates. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4410140 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44101402015-04-30 The 7-year teesside experience of primary prevention ICD indications following primary PCI (PPCI) and the potential impact of a change in NICE guidance Phan, Thanh Trung Khan, Saima Mahmood, Muhammad Muzaffar Mani, Sudha Wadehra, Vineet de Belder, Mark Thornley, Andrew James, Simon Linker, Nicholas J Turley, Andrew J Open Heart Arrhythmias and Sudden Death INTRODUCTION: The recovery of LV function in patients with severe LV impairment in the acute phase following primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) is not well established. The indication for a primary prevention ICD post-STEMI is dependent on which screening guidance, NICE or ESC, is followed. The potential impact of the new NICE guidance is estimated. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients presenting with a STEMI over a 7-year period (2005–2012) treated with PPCI to determine in-hospital mortality, LV function at index presentation, at 3 months and the predicted primary prevention ICD implantation rate using NICE (TA095) and ESC 2006 guidelines. Predicted implant rates using the new NICE guidance (TA314) and actual implantation rates were also assessed. RESULTS: 3902 patients with a mean age of 65±13 years underwent PPCI. Of those patients surviving until discharge, 332 (10%) had LVEF ≤35%. 254 of 332 patients (76%) with a severely impaired ventricle were followed up at participating centres. 210 of 254 (83%) patients had a repeat echocardiogram within 3 months post-MI; among these patients, 89 (42%) remained to have LVEF ≤35%. The number of patients fulfilling NICE and ESC criteria for primary prevention ICD implantation was 14 (16%) and 84 (94%), respectively. The actual number of patients receiving an ICD was 17 (19%). The number of patients fulfilling the new NICE (TA314) guidance was 84 (94%). CONCLUSIONS: A small proportion of patients with STEMIs undergoing PPCI have a severely impaired LV systolic function. A large proportion of these patients will have improved LV systolic function at 3 months. There is a five-fold difference in the predicted ICD implantation rates depending on which guidance is followed—NICE versus ESC. The potential impact of the new NICE (TA314) guidance on ICD implantation will be a significant increase in ICD implantation rates. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4410140/ /pubmed/25932332 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2014-000153 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Arrhythmias and Sudden Death Phan, Thanh Trung Khan, Saima Mahmood, Muhammad Muzaffar Mani, Sudha Wadehra, Vineet de Belder, Mark Thornley, Andrew James, Simon Linker, Nicholas J Turley, Andrew J The 7-year teesside experience of primary prevention ICD indications following primary PCI (PPCI) and the potential impact of a change in NICE guidance |
title | The 7-year teesside experience of primary prevention ICD indications following primary PCI (PPCI) and the potential impact of a change in NICE guidance |
title_full | The 7-year teesside experience of primary prevention ICD indications following primary PCI (PPCI) and the potential impact of a change in NICE guidance |
title_fullStr | The 7-year teesside experience of primary prevention ICD indications following primary PCI (PPCI) and the potential impact of a change in NICE guidance |
title_full_unstemmed | The 7-year teesside experience of primary prevention ICD indications following primary PCI (PPCI) and the potential impact of a change in NICE guidance |
title_short | The 7-year teesside experience of primary prevention ICD indications following primary PCI (PPCI) and the potential impact of a change in NICE guidance |
title_sort | 7-year teesside experience of primary prevention icd indications following primary pci (ppci) and the potential impact of a change in nice guidance |
topic | Arrhythmias and Sudden Death |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4410140/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25932332 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2014-000153 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT phanthanhtrung the7yearteessideexperienceofprimarypreventionicdindicationsfollowingprimarypcippciandthepotentialimpactofachangeinniceguidance AT khansaima the7yearteessideexperienceofprimarypreventionicdindicationsfollowingprimarypcippciandthepotentialimpactofachangeinniceguidance AT mahmoodmuhammadmuzaffar the7yearteessideexperienceofprimarypreventionicdindicationsfollowingprimarypcippciandthepotentialimpactofachangeinniceguidance AT manisudha the7yearteessideexperienceofprimarypreventionicdindicationsfollowingprimarypcippciandthepotentialimpactofachangeinniceguidance AT wadehravineet the7yearteessideexperienceofprimarypreventionicdindicationsfollowingprimarypcippciandthepotentialimpactofachangeinniceguidance AT debeldermark the7yearteessideexperienceofprimarypreventionicdindicationsfollowingprimarypcippciandthepotentialimpactofachangeinniceguidance AT thornleyandrew the7yearteessideexperienceofprimarypreventionicdindicationsfollowingprimarypcippciandthepotentialimpactofachangeinniceguidance AT jamessimon the7yearteessideexperienceofprimarypreventionicdindicationsfollowingprimarypcippciandthepotentialimpactofachangeinniceguidance AT linkernicholasj the7yearteessideexperienceofprimarypreventionicdindicationsfollowingprimarypcippciandthepotentialimpactofachangeinniceguidance AT turleyandrewj the7yearteessideexperienceofprimarypreventionicdindicationsfollowingprimarypcippciandthepotentialimpactofachangeinniceguidance AT phanthanhtrung 7yearteessideexperienceofprimarypreventionicdindicationsfollowingprimarypcippciandthepotentialimpactofachangeinniceguidance AT khansaima 7yearteessideexperienceofprimarypreventionicdindicationsfollowingprimarypcippciandthepotentialimpactofachangeinniceguidance AT mahmoodmuhammadmuzaffar 7yearteessideexperienceofprimarypreventionicdindicationsfollowingprimarypcippciandthepotentialimpactofachangeinniceguidance AT manisudha 7yearteessideexperienceofprimarypreventionicdindicationsfollowingprimarypcippciandthepotentialimpactofachangeinniceguidance AT wadehravineet 7yearteessideexperienceofprimarypreventionicdindicationsfollowingprimarypcippciandthepotentialimpactofachangeinniceguidance AT debeldermark 7yearteessideexperienceofprimarypreventionicdindicationsfollowingprimarypcippciandthepotentialimpactofachangeinniceguidance AT thornleyandrew 7yearteessideexperienceofprimarypreventionicdindicationsfollowingprimarypcippciandthepotentialimpactofachangeinniceguidance AT jamessimon 7yearteessideexperienceofprimarypreventionicdindicationsfollowingprimarypcippciandthepotentialimpactofachangeinniceguidance AT linkernicholasj 7yearteessideexperienceofprimarypreventionicdindicationsfollowingprimarypcippciandthepotentialimpactofachangeinniceguidance AT turleyandrewj 7yearteessideexperienceofprimarypreventionicdindicationsfollowingprimarypcippciandthepotentialimpactofachangeinniceguidance |