Cargando…

The 7-year teesside experience of primary prevention ICD indications following primary PCI (PPCI) and the potential impact of a change in NICE guidance

INTRODUCTION: The recovery of LV function in patients with severe LV impairment in the acute phase following primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) is not well established. The indication for a primary prevention ICD post-STEMI is dependent on which screening guidance, NICE or ESC, is fol...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Phan, Thanh Trung, Khan, Saima, Mahmood, Muhammad Muzaffar, Mani, Sudha, Wadehra, Vineet, de Belder, Mark, Thornley, Andrew, James, Simon, Linker, Nicholas J, Turley, Andrew J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4410140/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25932332
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2014-000153
_version_ 1782368278986883072
author Phan, Thanh Trung
Khan, Saima
Mahmood, Muhammad Muzaffar
Mani, Sudha
Wadehra, Vineet
de Belder, Mark
Thornley, Andrew
James, Simon
Linker, Nicholas J
Turley, Andrew J
author_facet Phan, Thanh Trung
Khan, Saima
Mahmood, Muhammad Muzaffar
Mani, Sudha
Wadehra, Vineet
de Belder, Mark
Thornley, Andrew
James, Simon
Linker, Nicholas J
Turley, Andrew J
author_sort Phan, Thanh Trung
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The recovery of LV function in patients with severe LV impairment in the acute phase following primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) is not well established. The indication for a primary prevention ICD post-STEMI is dependent on which screening guidance, NICE or ESC, is followed. The potential impact of the new NICE guidance is estimated. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients presenting with a STEMI over a 7-year period (2005–2012) treated with PPCI to determine in-hospital mortality, LV function at index presentation, at 3 months and the predicted primary prevention ICD implantation rate using NICE (TA095) and ESC 2006 guidelines. Predicted implant rates using the new NICE guidance (TA314) and actual implantation rates were also assessed. RESULTS: 3902 patients with a mean age of 65±13 years underwent PPCI. Of those patients surviving until discharge, 332 (10%) had LVEF ≤35%. 254 of 332 patients (76%) with a severely impaired ventricle were followed up at participating centres. 210 of 254 (83%) patients had a repeat echocardiogram within 3 months post-MI; among these patients, 89 (42%) remained to have LVEF ≤35%. The number of patients fulfilling NICE and ESC criteria for primary prevention ICD implantation was 14 (16%) and 84 (94%), respectively. The actual number of patients receiving an ICD was 17 (19%). The number of patients fulfilling the new NICE (TA314) guidance was 84 (94%). CONCLUSIONS: A small proportion of patients with STEMIs undergoing PPCI have a severely impaired LV systolic function. A large proportion of these patients will have improved LV systolic function at 3 months. There is a five-fold difference in the predicted ICD implantation rates depending on which guidance is followed—NICE versus ESC. The potential impact of the new NICE (TA314) guidance on ICD implantation will be a significant increase in ICD implantation rates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4410140
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44101402015-04-30 The 7-year teesside experience of primary prevention ICD indications following primary PCI (PPCI) and the potential impact of a change in NICE guidance Phan, Thanh Trung Khan, Saima Mahmood, Muhammad Muzaffar Mani, Sudha Wadehra, Vineet de Belder, Mark Thornley, Andrew James, Simon Linker, Nicholas J Turley, Andrew J Open Heart Arrhythmias and Sudden Death INTRODUCTION: The recovery of LV function in patients with severe LV impairment in the acute phase following primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) is not well established. The indication for a primary prevention ICD post-STEMI is dependent on which screening guidance, NICE or ESC, is followed. The potential impact of the new NICE guidance is estimated. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients presenting with a STEMI over a 7-year period (2005–2012) treated with PPCI to determine in-hospital mortality, LV function at index presentation, at 3 months and the predicted primary prevention ICD implantation rate using NICE (TA095) and ESC 2006 guidelines. Predicted implant rates using the new NICE guidance (TA314) and actual implantation rates were also assessed. RESULTS: 3902 patients with a mean age of 65±13 years underwent PPCI. Of those patients surviving until discharge, 332 (10%) had LVEF ≤35%. 254 of 332 patients (76%) with a severely impaired ventricle were followed up at participating centres. 210 of 254 (83%) patients had a repeat echocardiogram within 3 months post-MI; among these patients, 89 (42%) remained to have LVEF ≤35%. The number of patients fulfilling NICE and ESC criteria for primary prevention ICD implantation was 14 (16%) and 84 (94%), respectively. The actual number of patients receiving an ICD was 17 (19%). The number of patients fulfilling the new NICE (TA314) guidance was 84 (94%). CONCLUSIONS: A small proportion of patients with STEMIs undergoing PPCI have a severely impaired LV systolic function. A large proportion of these patients will have improved LV systolic function at 3 months. There is a five-fold difference in the predicted ICD implantation rates depending on which guidance is followed—NICE versus ESC. The potential impact of the new NICE (TA314) guidance on ICD implantation will be a significant increase in ICD implantation rates. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4410140/ /pubmed/25932332 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2014-000153 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Arrhythmias and Sudden Death
Phan, Thanh Trung
Khan, Saima
Mahmood, Muhammad Muzaffar
Mani, Sudha
Wadehra, Vineet
de Belder, Mark
Thornley, Andrew
James, Simon
Linker, Nicholas J
Turley, Andrew J
The 7-year teesside experience of primary prevention ICD indications following primary PCI (PPCI) and the potential impact of a change in NICE guidance
title The 7-year teesside experience of primary prevention ICD indications following primary PCI (PPCI) and the potential impact of a change in NICE guidance
title_full The 7-year teesside experience of primary prevention ICD indications following primary PCI (PPCI) and the potential impact of a change in NICE guidance
title_fullStr The 7-year teesside experience of primary prevention ICD indications following primary PCI (PPCI) and the potential impact of a change in NICE guidance
title_full_unstemmed The 7-year teesside experience of primary prevention ICD indications following primary PCI (PPCI) and the potential impact of a change in NICE guidance
title_short The 7-year teesside experience of primary prevention ICD indications following primary PCI (PPCI) and the potential impact of a change in NICE guidance
title_sort 7-year teesside experience of primary prevention icd indications following primary pci (ppci) and the potential impact of a change in nice guidance
topic Arrhythmias and Sudden Death
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4410140/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25932332
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2014-000153
work_keys_str_mv AT phanthanhtrung the7yearteessideexperienceofprimarypreventionicdindicationsfollowingprimarypcippciandthepotentialimpactofachangeinniceguidance
AT khansaima the7yearteessideexperienceofprimarypreventionicdindicationsfollowingprimarypcippciandthepotentialimpactofachangeinniceguidance
AT mahmoodmuhammadmuzaffar the7yearteessideexperienceofprimarypreventionicdindicationsfollowingprimarypcippciandthepotentialimpactofachangeinniceguidance
AT manisudha the7yearteessideexperienceofprimarypreventionicdindicationsfollowingprimarypcippciandthepotentialimpactofachangeinniceguidance
AT wadehravineet the7yearteessideexperienceofprimarypreventionicdindicationsfollowingprimarypcippciandthepotentialimpactofachangeinniceguidance
AT debeldermark the7yearteessideexperienceofprimarypreventionicdindicationsfollowingprimarypcippciandthepotentialimpactofachangeinniceguidance
AT thornleyandrew the7yearteessideexperienceofprimarypreventionicdindicationsfollowingprimarypcippciandthepotentialimpactofachangeinniceguidance
AT jamessimon the7yearteessideexperienceofprimarypreventionicdindicationsfollowingprimarypcippciandthepotentialimpactofachangeinniceguidance
AT linkernicholasj the7yearteessideexperienceofprimarypreventionicdindicationsfollowingprimarypcippciandthepotentialimpactofachangeinniceguidance
AT turleyandrewj the7yearteessideexperienceofprimarypreventionicdindicationsfollowingprimarypcippciandthepotentialimpactofachangeinniceguidance
AT phanthanhtrung 7yearteessideexperienceofprimarypreventionicdindicationsfollowingprimarypcippciandthepotentialimpactofachangeinniceguidance
AT khansaima 7yearteessideexperienceofprimarypreventionicdindicationsfollowingprimarypcippciandthepotentialimpactofachangeinniceguidance
AT mahmoodmuhammadmuzaffar 7yearteessideexperienceofprimarypreventionicdindicationsfollowingprimarypcippciandthepotentialimpactofachangeinniceguidance
AT manisudha 7yearteessideexperienceofprimarypreventionicdindicationsfollowingprimarypcippciandthepotentialimpactofachangeinniceguidance
AT wadehravineet 7yearteessideexperienceofprimarypreventionicdindicationsfollowingprimarypcippciandthepotentialimpactofachangeinniceguidance
AT debeldermark 7yearteessideexperienceofprimarypreventionicdindicationsfollowingprimarypcippciandthepotentialimpactofachangeinniceguidance
AT thornleyandrew 7yearteessideexperienceofprimarypreventionicdindicationsfollowingprimarypcippciandthepotentialimpactofachangeinniceguidance
AT jamessimon 7yearteessideexperienceofprimarypreventionicdindicationsfollowingprimarypcippciandthepotentialimpactofachangeinniceguidance
AT linkernicholasj 7yearteessideexperienceofprimarypreventionicdindicationsfollowingprimarypcippciandthepotentialimpactofachangeinniceguidance
AT turleyandrewj 7yearteessideexperienceofprimarypreventionicdindicationsfollowingprimarypcippciandthepotentialimpactofachangeinniceguidance