Cargando…

A Randomised Phase 2 Trial of Intensive Induction Chemotherapy (CBOP/BEP) and Standard BEP in Poor-prognosis Germ Cell Tumours (MRC TE23, CRUK 05/014, ISRCTN 53643604)

BACKGROUND: Standard chemotherapy for poor-prognosis metastatic nonseminoma has remained bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEP) for many years; more effective regimens are required. OBJECTIVE: To explore whether response rates with a new intensive chemotherapy regimen, CBOP/BEP (carboplatin, bleo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huddart, Robert A., Gabe, Rhian, Cafferty, Fay H., Pollock, Philip, White, Jeff D., Shamash, Jonathan, Cullen, Michael H., Stenning, Sally P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4410298/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25001888
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2014.06.034
_version_ 1782368306514100224
author Huddart, Robert A.
Gabe, Rhian
Cafferty, Fay H.
Pollock, Philip
White, Jeff D.
Shamash, Jonathan
Cullen, Michael H.
Stenning, Sally P.
author_facet Huddart, Robert A.
Gabe, Rhian
Cafferty, Fay H.
Pollock, Philip
White, Jeff D.
Shamash, Jonathan
Cullen, Michael H.
Stenning, Sally P.
author_sort Huddart, Robert A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Standard chemotherapy for poor-prognosis metastatic nonseminoma has remained bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEP) for many years; more effective regimens are required. OBJECTIVE: To explore whether response rates with a new intensive chemotherapy regimen, CBOP/BEP (carboplatin, bleomycin, vincristine, cisplatin/BEP), versus those in concurrent patients treated with standard BEP justify a phase 3 trial. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We conducted a phase 2 open-label randomised trial in patients with germ cell tumours of any extracranial primary site and one or more International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group poor-prognosis features. Patients were randomised between 2005 and 2009 at 16 UK centres. INTERVENTION: BEP (bleomycin 30 000 IU) was composed of four cycles over 12 wk. CBOP/BEP was composed of 2 × CBOP, 2 × BO, and 3 × BEP (bleomycin 15 000 IU). OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Primary end point was favourable response rate (FRR) comprising complete response or partial response and normal markers. Success required the lower two-sided 90% confidence limit to exclude FRRs <60%; 44 patients on CBOP/BEP gives 90% power to achieve this if the true FRR is ≥80%. Equal numbers were randomised to BEP to benchmark contemporary response rates. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: A total of 89 patients were randomised (43 CBOP/BEP, 46 BEP); 40 and 41, respectively, completed treatment. CBOP/BEP toxicity, largely haematologic, was high (96% vs 63% on BEP had Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v.3 grade ≥3). FRRs were 74% (90% confidence interval [CI], 61–85) with CBOP/BEP, 61% with BEP (90% CI, 48–73). After a median of 58-mo follow-up, 1-yr progression-free survival (PFS) was 65% and 43%, respectively (hazard ratio: 0.59; 95% CI, 0.33–1.06); 2-yr overall survival (OS) was 67% and 61%. Overall, 3 of 14 CBOP/BEP and 2 of 18 BEP deaths were attributed to toxicity, one after an overdose of bleomycin during CBOP/BEP. The trial was not powered to compare PFS. CONCLUSIONS: The primary outcome was met, the CI for CBOP/BEP excluding FRRs <61%, but CBOP/BEP was more toxic. PFS and OS data are promising but require confirmation in an international phase 3 trial. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this study we tested a new, more intensive way to deliver a combination of drugs often used to treat men with testicular cancer. We found that response rates were higher but that the CBOP/BEP regimen caused more short-term toxicity. Because most patients are diagnosed when their cancer is less advanced, it took twice as long to complete the trial as expected. Although we plan to carry out a larger trial, we will need international collaboration. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN53643604; http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN53643604.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4410298
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Elsevier Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44102982015-05-04 A Randomised Phase 2 Trial of Intensive Induction Chemotherapy (CBOP/BEP) and Standard BEP in Poor-prognosis Germ Cell Tumours (MRC TE23, CRUK 05/014, ISRCTN 53643604) Huddart, Robert A. Gabe, Rhian Cafferty, Fay H. Pollock, Philip White, Jeff D. Shamash, Jonathan Cullen, Michael H. Stenning, Sally P. Eur Urol Platinum Priority – Testis Cancer BACKGROUND: Standard chemotherapy for poor-prognosis metastatic nonseminoma has remained bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEP) for many years; more effective regimens are required. OBJECTIVE: To explore whether response rates with a new intensive chemotherapy regimen, CBOP/BEP (carboplatin, bleomycin, vincristine, cisplatin/BEP), versus those in concurrent patients treated with standard BEP justify a phase 3 trial. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We conducted a phase 2 open-label randomised trial in patients with germ cell tumours of any extracranial primary site and one or more International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group poor-prognosis features. Patients were randomised between 2005 and 2009 at 16 UK centres. INTERVENTION: BEP (bleomycin 30 000 IU) was composed of four cycles over 12 wk. CBOP/BEP was composed of 2 × CBOP, 2 × BO, and 3 × BEP (bleomycin 15 000 IU). OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Primary end point was favourable response rate (FRR) comprising complete response or partial response and normal markers. Success required the lower two-sided 90% confidence limit to exclude FRRs <60%; 44 patients on CBOP/BEP gives 90% power to achieve this if the true FRR is ≥80%. Equal numbers were randomised to BEP to benchmark contemporary response rates. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: A total of 89 patients were randomised (43 CBOP/BEP, 46 BEP); 40 and 41, respectively, completed treatment. CBOP/BEP toxicity, largely haematologic, was high (96% vs 63% on BEP had Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v.3 grade ≥3). FRRs were 74% (90% confidence interval [CI], 61–85) with CBOP/BEP, 61% with BEP (90% CI, 48–73). After a median of 58-mo follow-up, 1-yr progression-free survival (PFS) was 65% and 43%, respectively (hazard ratio: 0.59; 95% CI, 0.33–1.06); 2-yr overall survival (OS) was 67% and 61%. Overall, 3 of 14 CBOP/BEP and 2 of 18 BEP deaths were attributed to toxicity, one after an overdose of bleomycin during CBOP/BEP. The trial was not powered to compare PFS. CONCLUSIONS: The primary outcome was met, the CI for CBOP/BEP excluding FRRs <61%, but CBOP/BEP was more toxic. PFS and OS data are promising but require confirmation in an international phase 3 trial. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this study we tested a new, more intensive way to deliver a combination of drugs often used to treat men with testicular cancer. We found that response rates were higher but that the CBOP/BEP regimen caused more short-term toxicity. Because most patients are diagnosed when their cancer is less advanced, it took twice as long to complete the trial as expected. Although we plan to carry out a larger trial, we will need international collaboration. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN53643604; http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN53643604. Elsevier Science 2015-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4410298/ /pubmed/25001888 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2014.06.034 Text en © 2014 Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Association of Urology. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use.
spellingShingle Platinum Priority – Testis Cancer
Huddart, Robert A.
Gabe, Rhian
Cafferty, Fay H.
Pollock, Philip
White, Jeff D.
Shamash, Jonathan
Cullen, Michael H.
Stenning, Sally P.
A Randomised Phase 2 Trial of Intensive Induction Chemotherapy (CBOP/BEP) and Standard BEP in Poor-prognosis Germ Cell Tumours (MRC TE23, CRUK 05/014, ISRCTN 53643604)
title A Randomised Phase 2 Trial of Intensive Induction Chemotherapy (CBOP/BEP) and Standard BEP in Poor-prognosis Germ Cell Tumours (MRC TE23, CRUK 05/014, ISRCTN 53643604)
title_full A Randomised Phase 2 Trial of Intensive Induction Chemotherapy (CBOP/BEP) and Standard BEP in Poor-prognosis Germ Cell Tumours (MRC TE23, CRUK 05/014, ISRCTN 53643604)
title_fullStr A Randomised Phase 2 Trial of Intensive Induction Chemotherapy (CBOP/BEP) and Standard BEP in Poor-prognosis Germ Cell Tumours (MRC TE23, CRUK 05/014, ISRCTN 53643604)
title_full_unstemmed A Randomised Phase 2 Trial of Intensive Induction Chemotherapy (CBOP/BEP) and Standard BEP in Poor-prognosis Germ Cell Tumours (MRC TE23, CRUK 05/014, ISRCTN 53643604)
title_short A Randomised Phase 2 Trial of Intensive Induction Chemotherapy (CBOP/BEP) and Standard BEP in Poor-prognosis Germ Cell Tumours (MRC TE23, CRUK 05/014, ISRCTN 53643604)
title_sort randomised phase 2 trial of intensive induction chemotherapy (cbop/bep) and standard bep in poor-prognosis germ cell tumours (mrc te23, cruk 05/014, isrctn 53643604)
topic Platinum Priority – Testis Cancer
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4410298/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25001888
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2014.06.034
work_keys_str_mv AT huddartroberta arandomisedphase2trialofintensiveinductionchemotherapycbopbepandstandardbepinpoorprognosisgermcelltumoursmrcte23cruk05014isrctn53643604
AT gaberhian arandomisedphase2trialofintensiveinductionchemotherapycbopbepandstandardbepinpoorprognosisgermcelltumoursmrcte23cruk05014isrctn53643604
AT caffertyfayh arandomisedphase2trialofintensiveinductionchemotherapycbopbepandstandardbepinpoorprognosisgermcelltumoursmrcte23cruk05014isrctn53643604
AT pollockphilip arandomisedphase2trialofintensiveinductionchemotherapycbopbepandstandardbepinpoorprognosisgermcelltumoursmrcte23cruk05014isrctn53643604
AT whitejeffd arandomisedphase2trialofintensiveinductionchemotherapycbopbepandstandardbepinpoorprognosisgermcelltumoursmrcte23cruk05014isrctn53643604
AT shamashjonathan arandomisedphase2trialofintensiveinductionchemotherapycbopbepandstandardbepinpoorprognosisgermcelltumoursmrcte23cruk05014isrctn53643604
AT cullenmichaelh arandomisedphase2trialofintensiveinductionchemotherapycbopbepandstandardbepinpoorprognosisgermcelltumoursmrcte23cruk05014isrctn53643604
AT stenningsallyp arandomisedphase2trialofintensiveinductionchemotherapycbopbepandstandardbepinpoorprognosisgermcelltumoursmrcte23cruk05014isrctn53643604
AT arandomisedphase2trialofintensiveinductionchemotherapycbopbepandstandardbepinpoorprognosisgermcelltumoursmrcte23cruk05014isrctn53643604
AT huddartroberta randomisedphase2trialofintensiveinductionchemotherapycbopbepandstandardbepinpoorprognosisgermcelltumoursmrcte23cruk05014isrctn53643604
AT gaberhian randomisedphase2trialofintensiveinductionchemotherapycbopbepandstandardbepinpoorprognosisgermcelltumoursmrcte23cruk05014isrctn53643604
AT caffertyfayh randomisedphase2trialofintensiveinductionchemotherapycbopbepandstandardbepinpoorprognosisgermcelltumoursmrcte23cruk05014isrctn53643604
AT pollockphilip randomisedphase2trialofintensiveinductionchemotherapycbopbepandstandardbepinpoorprognosisgermcelltumoursmrcte23cruk05014isrctn53643604
AT whitejeffd randomisedphase2trialofintensiveinductionchemotherapycbopbepandstandardbepinpoorprognosisgermcelltumoursmrcte23cruk05014isrctn53643604
AT shamashjonathan randomisedphase2trialofintensiveinductionchemotherapycbopbepandstandardbepinpoorprognosisgermcelltumoursmrcte23cruk05014isrctn53643604
AT cullenmichaelh randomisedphase2trialofintensiveinductionchemotherapycbopbepandstandardbepinpoorprognosisgermcelltumoursmrcte23cruk05014isrctn53643604
AT stenningsallyp randomisedphase2trialofintensiveinductionchemotherapycbopbepandstandardbepinpoorprognosisgermcelltumoursmrcte23cruk05014isrctn53643604
AT randomisedphase2trialofintensiveinductionchemotherapycbopbepandstandardbepinpoorprognosisgermcelltumoursmrcte23cruk05014isrctn53643604