Cargando…

Comparative proteomic analysis of spermatozoa isolated by swim-up or density gradient centrifugation

BACKGROUND: Reports about the morphologic and functional characteristics of spermatozoa prepared by density gradient centrifugation (DC) or swim-up (SU) have produced discordant results. We have performed a proteomic comparison of cells prepared by DC and SU providing a molecular insight into the di...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Luppi, Stefania, Martinelli, Monica, Giacomini, Elisa, Giolo, Elena, Zito, Gabriella, Garcia, Rodolfo C, Ricci, Giuseppe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4410587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25928042
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-015-0027-y
_version_ 1782368350226087936
author Luppi, Stefania
Martinelli, Monica
Giacomini, Elisa
Giolo, Elena
Zito, Gabriella
Garcia, Rodolfo C
Ricci, Giuseppe
author_facet Luppi, Stefania
Martinelli, Monica
Giacomini, Elisa
Giolo, Elena
Zito, Gabriella
Garcia, Rodolfo C
Ricci, Giuseppe
author_sort Luppi, Stefania
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Reports about the morphologic and functional characteristics of spermatozoa prepared by density gradient centrifugation (DC) or swim-up (SU) have produced discordant results. We have performed a proteomic comparison of cells prepared by DC and SU providing a molecular insight into the differences between these two methods of sperm cell isolation. METHODS: Protein maps were obtained by 2-dimensional (2-D) separations consisting of isoelectrofocusing (IEF) from pI 3 to 11 followed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. 2-D gels were stained with Sypro Ruby. Map images of DC and SU spermatozoa were compared using dedicated software. Intensities of a given spot were considered different between DC and SU when their group mean differed by >1.5-fold (p < 0.05, Anova). RESULTS: No differences were observed for 853 spots, indicating a 98.7% similarity between DC and SU. Five spots were DC > SU and 1 was SU > DC. Proteins present in 3 of the differential spots could be identified. One DC > SU spot contained lactate dehydrogenase C and gamma-glutamylhydrolase, a second DC > SU spot contained fumarate hydratase and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase-2, and a SU > DC spot contained pyruvate kinase M1/M2. CONCLUSIONS: The differences in protein levels found on comparison of DC with SU spermatozoa indicate possible dissimilarities in their glycolytic metabolism and DNA methylation and suggest that DC cells may have a better capacitation potential. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12958-015-0027-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4410587
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44105872015-04-28 Comparative proteomic analysis of spermatozoa isolated by swim-up or density gradient centrifugation Luppi, Stefania Martinelli, Monica Giacomini, Elisa Giolo, Elena Zito, Gabriella Garcia, Rodolfo C Ricci, Giuseppe Reprod Biol Endocrinol Research BACKGROUND: Reports about the morphologic and functional characteristics of spermatozoa prepared by density gradient centrifugation (DC) or swim-up (SU) have produced discordant results. We have performed a proteomic comparison of cells prepared by DC and SU providing a molecular insight into the differences between these two methods of sperm cell isolation. METHODS: Protein maps were obtained by 2-dimensional (2-D) separations consisting of isoelectrofocusing (IEF) from pI 3 to 11 followed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. 2-D gels were stained with Sypro Ruby. Map images of DC and SU spermatozoa were compared using dedicated software. Intensities of a given spot were considered different between DC and SU when their group mean differed by >1.5-fold (p < 0.05, Anova). RESULTS: No differences were observed for 853 spots, indicating a 98.7% similarity between DC and SU. Five spots were DC > SU and 1 was SU > DC. Proteins present in 3 of the differential spots could be identified. One DC > SU spot contained lactate dehydrogenase C and gamma-glutamylhydrolase, a second DC > SU spot contained fumarate hydratase and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase-2, and a SU > DC spot contained pyruvate kinase M1/M2. CONCLUSIONS: The differences in protein levels found on comparison of DC with SU spermatozoa indicate possible dissimilarities in their glycolytic metabolism and DNA methylation and suggest that DC cells may have a better capacitation potential. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12958-015-0027-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4410587/ /pubmed/25928042 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-015-0027-y Text en © Luppi et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Luppi, Stefania
Martinelli, Monica
Giacomini, Elisa
Giolo, Elena
Zito, Gabriella
Garcia, Rodolfo C
Ricci, Giuseppe
Comparative proteomic analysis of spermatozoa isolated by swim-up or density gradient centrifugation
title Comparative proteomic analysis of spermatozoa isolated by swim-up or density gradient centrifugation
title_full Comparative proteomic analysis of spermatozoa isolated by swim-up or density gradient centrifugation
title_fullStr Comparative proteomic analysis of spermatozoa isolated by swim-up or density gradient centrifugation
title_full_unstemmed Comparative proteomic analysis of spermatozoa isolated by swim-up or density gradient centrifugation
title_short Comparative proteomic analysis of spermatozoa isolated by swim-up or density gradient centrifugation
title_sort comparative proteomic analysis of spermatozoa isolated by swim-up or density gradient centrifugation
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4410587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25928042
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-015-0027-y
work_keys_str_mv AT luppistefania comparativeproteomicanalysisofspermatozoaisolatedbyswimupordensitygradientcentrifugation
AT martinellimonica comparativeproteomicanalysisofspermatozoaisolatedbyswimupordensitygradientcentrifugation
AT giacominielisa comparativeproteomicanalysisofspermatozoaisolatedbyswimupordensitygradientcentrifugation
AT gioloelena comparativeproteomicanalysisofspermatozoaisolatedbyswimupordensitygradientcentrifugation
AT zitogabriella comparativeproteomicanalysisofspermatozoaisolatedbyswimupordensitygradientcentrifugation
AT garciarodolfoc comparativeproteomicanalysisofspermatozoaisolatedbyswimupordensitygradientcentrifugation
AT riccigiuseppe comparativeproteomicanalysisofspermatozoaisolatedbyswimupordensitygradientcentrifugation