Cargando…

Distractor Suppression When Attention Fails: Behavioral Evidence for a Flexible Selective Attention Mechanism

Despite consistent evidence showing that attention is a multifaceted mechanism that can operate at multiple levels of processing depending on the structure and demands of the task, investigations of the attentional blink phenomenon have consistently shown that the impairment in reporting the second...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elliott, James C., Giesbrecht, Barry
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4411164/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25915934
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126203
_version_ 1782368433767186432
author Elliott, James C.
Giesbrecht, Barry
author_facet Elliott, James C.
Giesbrecht, Barry
author_sort Elliott, James C.
collection PubMed
description Despite consistent evidence showing that attention is a multifaceted mechanism that can operate at multiple levels of processing depending on the structure and demands of the task, investigations of the attentional blink phenomenon have consistently shown that the impairment in reporting the second of two targets typically occurs at a late, or post-perceptual, stage of processing. This suggests that the attentional blink phenomenon may represent the operation of a unique attentional mechanism that is not as flexible as other attentional mechanisms. To test whether the attentional blink is a fixed or flexible phenomenon, we manipulated first target task demands (i.e., difficulty) and measured the influence this had on processing a subsequently presented distractor and the second target. If the attentional blink represents a mechanism that is fixed and consistently fails at a single stage of processing, then manipulations of task difficulty should not affect distractor processing. However, if the attentional blink represents a more multifaceted and flexible mechanism, then task difficulty should modulate distractor processing. The results revealed that distractor processing during the AB was attenuated under high task difficulty. In addition, unlike previous studies, we failed to find a correlation between distractor processing and the severity of the attentional blink. Using a simulation, we demonstrate that the previously reported correlations may have been spurious and due to using variables that were not independent. Overall, the present results support the conclusion that the selectivity of attention during the AB is flexible and depends on the structure and demands of the task.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4411164
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44111642015-05-07 Distractor Suppression When Attention Fails: Behavioral Evidence for a Flexible Selective Attention Mechanism Elliott, James C. Giesbrecht, Barry PLoS One Research Article Despite consistent evidence showing that attention is a multifaceted mechanism that can operate at multiple levels of processing depending on the structure and demands of the task, investigations of the attentional blink phenomenon have consistently shown that the impairment in reporting the second of two targets typically occurs at a late, or post-perceptual, stage of processing. This suggests that the attentional blink phenomenon may represent the operation of a unique attentional mechanism that is not as flexible as other attentional mechanisms. To test whether the attentional blink is a fixed or flexible phenomenon, we manipulated first target task demands (i.e., difficulty) and measured the influence this had on processing a subsequently presented distractor and the second target. If the attentional blink represents a mechanism that is fixed and consistently fails at a single stage of processing, then manipulations of task difficulty should not affect distractor processing. However, if the attentional blink represents a more multifaceted and flexible mechanism, then task difficulty should modulate distractor processing. The results revealed that distractor processing during the AB was attenuated under high task difficulty. In addition, unlike previous studies, we failed to find a correlation between distractor processing and the severity of the attentional blink. Using a simulation, we demonstrate that the previously reported correlations may have been spurious and due to using variables that were not independent. Overall, the present results support the conclusion that the selectivity of attention during the AB is flexible and depends on the structure and demands of the task. Public Library of Science 2015-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4411164/ /pubmed/25915934 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126203 Text en © 2015 Elliott, Giesbrecht http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Elliott, James C.
Giesbrecht, Barry
Distractor Suppression When Attention Fails: Behavioral Evidence for a Flexible Selective Attention Mechanism
title Distractor Suppression When Attention Fails: Behavioral Evidence for a Flexible Selective Attention Mechanism
title_full Distractor Suppression When Attention Fails: Behavioral Evidence for a Flexible Selective Attention Mechanism
title_fullStr Distractor Suppression When Attention Fails: Behavioral Evidence for a Flexible Selective Attention Mechanism
title_full_unstemmed Distractor Suppression When Attention Fails: Behavioral Evidence for a Flexible Selective Attention Mechanism
title_short Distractor Suppression When Attention Fails: Behavioral Evidence for a Flexible Selective Attention Mechanism
title_sort distractor suppression when attention fails: behavioral evidence for a flexible selective attention mechanism
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4411164/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25915934
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126203
work_keys_str_mv AT elliottjamesc distractorsuppressionwhenattentionfailsbehavioralevidenceforaflexibleselectiveattentionmechanism
AT giesbrechtbarry distractorsuppressionwhenattentionfailsbehavioralevidenceforaflexibleselectiveattentionmechanism