Cargando…
Comparing Graphene Growth on Cu(111) versus Oxidized Cu(111)
[Image: see text] The epitaxial growth of graphene on catalytically active metallic surfaces via chemical vapor deposition (CVD) is known to be one of the most reliable routes toward high-quality large-area graphene. This CVD-grown graphene is generally coupled to its metallic support resulting in a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Chemical Society
2015
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4411207/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25611528 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/nl5036463 |
_version_ | 1782368437274673152 |
---|---|
author | Gottardi, Stefano Müller, Kathrin Bignardi, Luca Moreno-López, Juan Carlos Pham, Tuan Anh Ivashenko, Oleksii Yablonskikh, Mikhail Barinov, Alexei Björk, Jonas Rudolf, Petra Stöhr, Meike |
author_facet | Gottardi, Stefano Müller, Kathrin Bignardi, Luca Moreno-López, Juan Carlos Pham, Tuan Anh Ivashenko, Oleksii Yablonskikh, Mikhail Barinov, Alexei Björk, Jonas Rudolf, Petra Stöhr, Meike |
author_sort | Gottardi, Stefano |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] The epitaxial growth of graphene on catalytically active metallic surfaces via chemical vapor deposition (CVD) is known to be one of the most reliable routes toward high-quality large-area graphene. This CVD-grown graphene is generally coupled to its metallic support resulting in a modification of its intrinsic properties. Growth on oxides is a promising alternative that might lead to a decoupled graphene layer. Here, we compare graphene on a pure metallic to graphene on an oxidized copper surface in both cases grown by a single step CVD process under similar conditions. Remarkably, the growth on copper oxide, a high-k dielectric material, preserves the intrinsic properties of graphene; it is not doped and a linear dispersion is observed close to the Fermi energy. Density functional theory calculations give additional insight into the reaction processes and help explaining the catalytic activity of the copper oxide surface. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4411207 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | American Chemical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44112072015-05-01 Comparing Graphene Growth on Cu(111) versus Oxidized Cu(111) Gottardi, Stefano Müller, Kathrin Bignardi, Luca Moreno-López, Juan Carlos Pham, Tuan Anh Ivashenko, Oleksii Yablonskikh, Mikhail Barinov, Alexei Björk, Jonas Rudolf, Petra Stöhr, Meike Nano Lett [Image: see text] The epitaxial growth of graphene on catalytically active metallic surfaces via chemical vapor deposition (CVD) is known to be one of the most reliable routes toward high-quality large-area graphene. This CVD-grown graphene is generally coupled to its metallic support resulting in a modification of its intrinsic properties. Growth on oxides is a promising alternative that might lead to a decoupled graphene layer. Here, we compare graphene on a pure metallic to graphene on an oxidized copper surface in both cases grown by a single step CVD process under similar conditions. Remarkably, the growth on copper oxide, a high-k dielectric material, preserves the intrinsic properties of graphene; it is not doped and a linear dispersion is observed close to the Fermi energy. Density functional theory calculations give additional insight into the reaction processes and help explaining the catalytic activity of the copper oxide surface. American Chemical Society 2015-01-22 2015-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4411207/ /pubmed/25611528 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/nl5036463 Text en Copyright © 2015 American Chemical Society This is an open access article published under an ACS AuthorChoice License (http://pubs.acs.org/page/policy/authorchoice_termsofuse.html) , which permits copying and redistribution of the article or any adaptations for non-commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Gottardi, Stefano Müller, Kathrin Bignardi, Luca Moreno-López, Juan Carlos Pham, Tuan Anh Ivashenko, Oleksii Yablonskikh, Mikhail Barinov, Alexei Björk, Jonas Rudolf, Petra Stöhr, Meike Comparing Graphene Growth on Cu(111) versus Oxidized Cu(111) |
title | Comparing Graphene Growth on Cu(111) versus Oxidized
Cu(111) |
title_full | Comparing Graphene Growth on Cu(111) versus Oxidized
Cu(111) |
title_fullStr | Comparing Graphene Growth on Cu(111) versus Oxidized
Cu(111) |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing Graphene Growth on Cu(111) versus Oxidized
Cu(111) |
title_short | Comparing Graphene Growth on Cu(111) versus Oxidized
Cu(111) |
title_sort | comparing graphene growth on cu(111) versus oxidized
cu(111) |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4411207/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25611528 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/nl5036463 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gottardistefano comparinggraphenegrowthoncu111versusoxidizedcu111 AT mullerkathrin comparinggraphenegrowthoncu111versusoxidizedcu111 AT bignardiluca comparinggraphenegrowthoncu111versusoxidizedcu111 AT morenolopezjuancarlos comparinggraphenegrowthoncu111versusoxidizedcu111 AT phamtuananh comparinggraphenegrowthoncu111versusoxidizedcu111 AT ivashenkooleksii comparinggraphenegrowthoncu111versusoxidizedcu111 AT yablonskikhmikhail comparinggraphenegrowthoncu111versusoxidizedcu111 AT barinovalexei comparinggraphenegrowthoncu111versusoxidizedcu111 AT bjorkjonas comparinggraphenegrowthoncu111versusoxidizedcu111 AT rudolfpetra comparinggraphenegrowthoncu111versusoxidizedcu111 AT stohrmeike comparinggraphenegrowthoncu111versusoxidizedcu111 |