Cargando…

Comparing Graphene Growth on Cu(111) versus Oxidized Cu(111)

[Image: see text] The epitaxial growth of graphene on catalytically active metallic surfaces via chemical vapor deposition (CVD) is known to be one of the most reliable routes toward high-quality large-area graphene. This CVD-grown graphene is generally coupled to its metallic support resulting in a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gottardi, Stefano, Müller, Kathrin, Bignardi, Luca, Moreno-López, Juan Carlos, Pham, Tuan Anh, Ivashenko, Oleksii, Yablonskikh, Mikhail, Barinov, Alexei, Björk, Jonas, Rudolf, Petra, Stöhr, Meike
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2015
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4411207/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25611528
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/nl5036463
_version_ 1782368437274673152
author Gottardi, Stefano
Müller, Kathrin
Bignardi, Luca
Moreno-López, Juan Carlos
Pham, Tuan Anh
Ivashenko, Oleksii
Yablonskikh, Mikhail
Barinov, Alexei
Björk, Jonas
Rudolf, Petra
Stöhr, Meike
author_facet Gottardi, Stefano
Müller, Kathrin
Bignardi, Luca
Moreno-López, Juan Carlos
Pham, Tuan Anh
Ivashenko, Oleksii
Yablonskikh, Mikhail
Barinov, Alexei
Björk, Jonas
Rudolf, Petra
Stöhr, Meike
author_sort Gottardi, Stefano
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] The epitaxial growth of graphene on catalytically active metallic surfaces via chemical vapor deposition (CVD) is known to be one of the most reliable routes toward high-quality large-area graphene. This CVD-grown graphene is generally coupled to its metallic support resulting in a modification of its intrinsic properties. Growth on oxides is a promising alternative that might lead to a decoupled graphene layer. Here, we compare graphene on a pure metallic to graphene on an oxidized copper surface in both cases grown by a single step CVD process under similar conditions. Remarkably, the growth on copper oxide, a high-k dielectric material, preserves the intrinsic properties of graphene; it is not doped and a linear dispersion is observed close to the Fermi energy. Density functional theory calculations give additional insight into the reaction processes and help explaining the catalytic activity of the copper oxide surface.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4411207
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44112072015-05-01 Comparing Graphene Growth on Cu(111) versus Oxidized Cu(111) Gottardi, Stefano Müller, Kathrin Bignardi, Luca Moreno-López, Juan Carlos Pham, Tuan Anh Ivashenko, Oleksii Yablonskikh, Mikhail Barinov, Alexei Björk, Jonas Rudolf, Petra Stöhr, Meike Nano Lett [Image: see text] The epitaxial growth of graphene on catalytically active metallic surfaces via chemical vapor deposition (CVD) is known to be one of the most reliable routes toward high-quality large-area graphene. This CVD-grown graphene is generally coupled to its metallic support resulting in a modification of its intrinsic properties. Growth on oxides is a promising alternative that might lead to a decoupled graphene layer. Here, we compare graphene on a pure metallic to graphene on an oxidized copper surface in both cases grown by a single step CVD process under similar conditions. Remarkably, the growth on copper oxide, a high-k dielectric material, preserves the intrinsic properties of graphene; it is not doped and a linear dispersion is observed close to the Fermi energy. Density functional theory calculations give additional insight into the reaction processes and help explaining the catalytic activity of the copper oxide surface. American Chemical Society 2015-01-22 2015-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4411207/ /pubmed/25611528 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/nl5036463 Text en Copyright © 2015 American Chemical Society This is an open access article published under an ACS AuthorChoice License (http://pubs.acs.org/page/policy/authorchoice_termsofuse.html) , which permits copying and redistribution of the article or any adaptations for non-commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Gottardi, Stefano
Müller, Kathrin
Bignardi, Luca
Moreno-López, Juan Carlos
Pham, Tuan Anh
Ivashenko, Oleksii
Yablonskikh, Mikhail
Barinov, Alexei
Björk, Jonas
Rudolf, Petra
Stöhr, Meike
Comparing Graphene Growth on Cu(111) versus Oxidized Cu(111)
title Comparing Graphene Growth on Cu(111) versus Oxidized Cu(111)
title_full Comparing Graphene Growth on Cu(111) versus Oxidized Cu(111)
title_fullStr Comparing Graphene Growth on Cu(111) versus Oxidized Cu(111)
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Graphene Growth on Cu(111) versus Oxidized Cu(111)
title_short Comparing Graphene Growth on Cu(111) versus Oxidized Cu(111)
title_sort comparing graphene growth on cu(111) versus oxidized cu(111)
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4411207/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25611528
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/nl5036463
work_keys_str_mv AT gottardistefano comparinggraphenegrowthoncu111versusoxidizedcu111
AT mullerkathrin comparinggraphenegrowthoncu111versusoxidizedcu111
AT bignardiluca comparinggraphenegrowthoncu111versusoxidizedcu111
AT morenolopezjuancarlos comparinggraphenegrowthoncu111versusoxidizedcu111
AT phamtuananh comparinggraphenegrowthoncu111versusoxidizedcu111
AT ivashenkooleksii comparinggraphenegrowthoncu111versusoxidizedcu111
AT yablonskikhmikhail comparinggraphenegrowthoncu111versusoxidizedcu111
AT barinovalexei comparinggraphenegrowthoncu111versusoxidizedcu111
AT bjorkjonas comparinggraphenegrowthoncu111versusoxidizedcu111
AT rudolfpetra comparinggraphenegrowthoncu111versusoxidizedcu111
AT stohrmeike comparinggraphenegrowthoncu111versusoxidizedcu111