Cargando…

Systematic evaluation of an atomic clock at 2 × 10(−18) total uncertainty

The pursuit of better atomic clocks has advanced many research areas, providing better quantum state control, new insights in quantum science, tighter limits on fundamental constant variation and improved tests of relativity. The record for the best stability and accuracy is currently held by optica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nicholson, T.L., Campbell, S.L., Hutson, R.B., Marti, G.E., Bloom, B.J., McNally, R.L., Zhang, W., Barrett, M.D., Safronova, M.S., Strouse, G.F., Tew, W.L., Ye, J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Pub. Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4411304/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25898253
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7896
_version_ 1782368452960321536
author Nicholson, T.L.
Campbell, S.L.
Hutson, R.B.
Marti, G.E.
Bloom, B.J.
McNally, R.L.
Zhang, W.
Barrett, M.D.
Safronova, M.S.
Strouse, G.F.
Tew, W.L.
Ye, J.
author_facet Nicholson, T.L.
Campbell, S.L.
Hutson, R.B.
Marti, G.E.
Bloom, B.J.
McNally, R.L.
Zhang, W.
Barrett, M.D.
Safronova, M.S.
Strouse, G.F.
Tew, W.L.
Ye, J.
author_sort Nicholson, T.L.
collection PubMed
description The pursuit of better atomic clocks has advanced many research areas, providing better quantum state control, new insights in quantum science, tighter limits on fundamental constant variation and improved tests of relativity. The record for the best stability and accuracy is currently held by optical lattice clocks. Here we take an important step towards realizing the full potential of a many-particle clock with a state-of-the-art stable laser. Our (87)Sr optical lattice clock now achieves fractional stability of 2.2 × 10(−16) at 1 s. With this improved stability, we perform a new accuracy evaluation of our clock, reducing many systematic uncertainties that limited our previous measurements, such as those in the lattice ac Stark shift, the atoms' thermal environment and the atomic response to room-temperature blackbody radiation. Our combined measurements have reduced the total uncertainty of the JILA Sr clock to 2.1 × 10(−18) in fractional frequency units.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4411304
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Nature Pub. Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44113042015-05-08 Systematic evaluation of an atomic clock at 2 × 10(−18) total uncertainty Nicholson, T.L. Campbell, S.L. Hutson, R.B. Marti, G.E. Bloom, B.J. McNally, R.L. Zhang, W. Barrett, M.D. Safronova, M.S. Strouse, G.F. Tew, W.L. Ye, J. Nat Commun Article The pursuit of better atomic clocks has advanced many research areas, providing better quantum state control, new insights in quantum science, tighter limits on fundamental constant variation and improved tests of relativity. The record for the best stability and accuracy is currently held by optical lattice clocks. Here we take an important step towards realizing the full potential of a many-particle clock with a state-of-the-art stable laser. Our (87)Sr optical lattice clock now achieves fractional stability of 2.2 × 10(−16) at 1 s. With this improved stability, we perform a new accuracy evaluation of our clock, reducing many systematic uncertainties that limited our previous measurements, such as those in the lattice ac Stark shift, the atoms' thermal environment and the atomic response to room-temperature blackbody radiation. Our combined measurements have reduced the total uncertainty of the JILA Sr clock to 2.1 × 10(−18) in fractional frequency units. Nature Pub. Group 2015-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4411304/ /pubmed/25898253 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7896 Text en Copyright © 2015, Nature Publishing Group, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited. All Rights Reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Nicholson, T.L.
Campbell, S.L.
Hutson, R.B.
Marti, G.E.
Bloom, B.J.
McNally, R.L.
Zhang, W.
Barrett, M.D.
Safronova, M.S.
Strouse, G.F.
Tew, W.L.
Ye, J.
Systematic evaluation of an atomic clock at 2 × 10(−18) total uncertainty
title Systematic evaluation of an atomic clock at 2 × 10(−18) total uncertainty
title_full Systematic evaluation of an atomic clock at 2 × 10(−18) total uncertainty
title_fullStr Systematic evaluation of an atomic clock at 2 × 10(−18) total uncertainty
title_full_unstemmed Systematic evaluation of an atomic clock at 2 × 10(−18) total uncertainty
title_short Systematic evaluation of an atomic clock at 2 × 10(−18) total uncertainty
title_sort systematic evaluation of an atomic clock at 2 × 10(−18) total uncertainty
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4411304/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25898253
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7896
work_keys_str_mv AT nicholsontl systematicevaluationofanatomicclockat21018totaluncertainty
AT campbellsl systematicevaluationofanatomicclockat21018totaluncertainty
AT hutsonrb systematicevaluationofanatomicclockat21018totaluncertainty
AT martige systematicevaluationofanatomicclockat21018totaluncertainty
AT bloombj systematicevaluationofanatomicclockat21018totaluncertainty
AT mcnallyrl systematicevaluationofanatomicclockat21018totaluncertainty
AT zhangw systematicevaluationofanatomicclockat21018totaluncertainty
AT barrettmd systematicevaluationofanatomicclockat21018totaluncertainty
AT safronovams systematicevaluationofanatomicclockat21018totaluncertainty
AT strousegf systematicevaluationofanatomicclockat21018totaluncertainty
AT tewwl systematicevaluationofanatomicclockat21018totaluncertainty
AT yej systematicevaluationofanatomicclockat21018totaluncertainty