Cargando…

Inducible clindamycin resistance in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus due to erm genes, Iran

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Resistance to macrolide can be mediated by erm and msrA genes in Staphylococcus aureus. There are the evidences that show erm genes may be causative agent of inducible or constitutive resistance. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of inducible clindamyc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moosavian, Mojtaba, Shoja, Saeed, Rostami, Soodabeh, Torabipour, Maryam, Farshadzadeh, Zahra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4411429/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25926961
_version_ 1782368470313205760
author Moosavian, Mojtaba
Shoja, Saeed
Rostami, Soodabeh
Torabipour, Maryam
Farshadzadeh, Zahra
author_facet Moosavian, Mojtaba
Shoja, Saeed
Rostami, Soodabeh
Torabipour, Maryam
Farshadzadeh, Zahra
author_sort Moosavian, Mojtaba
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Resistance to macrolide can be mediated by erm and msrA genes in Staphylococcus aureus. There are the evidences that show erm genes may be causative agent of inducible or constitutive resistance. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of inducible clindamycin resistance and determine the most frequency of erm and msrA genes among S. aureus isolates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study a total of 124 non duplicated clinical isolates of S. aureus were tested with disk diffusion method. All isolates were tested by PCR for mecA, ermA, ermB, ermC and msrA genes. RESULTS: According to PCR results, 48.4% had mecA gene and 51.6% were mecA negative. By phenotypic D-test method, 32.3% revealed inducible resistance and recorded as D and D(+). Sensitive and constitutive phenotypes were found in 54.8% and 12.9% of isolates respectively. Inducible clindamycin resistance was more prevalent in MRSA (29%) than MSSA isolates (2.4%). Among studied erm genes, the most frequency genes were ermA and ermC with 41.1% and 17.7% respectively. Three isolates of them had D phenotype, while the PCR results of erm genes were negative. All isolates were negative for ermB or msrA genes. CONCLUSION: Since S. aureus isolates with inducible resistance may mutate and change to constitutive resistance, to prevent treatment failure, we suggest that inducible resistance test be performed on erythromycin resistant/clindamycin sensitive isolates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4411429
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44114292015-04-29 Inducible clindamycin resistance in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus due to erm genes, Iran Moosavian, Mojtaba Shoja, Saeed Rostami, Soodabeh Torabipour, Maryam Farshadzadeh, Zahra Iran J Microbiol Medical Sciences BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Resistance to macrolide can be mediated by erm and msrA genes in Staphylococcus aureus. There are the evidences that show erm genes may be causative agent of inducible or constitutive resistance. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of inducible clindamycin resistance and determine the most frequency of erm and msrA genes among S. aureus isolates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study a total of 124 non duplicated clinical isolates of S. aureus were tested with disk diffusion method. All isolates were tested by PCR for mecA, ermA, ermB, ermC and msrA genes. RESULTS: According to PCR results, 48.4% had mecA gene and 51.6% were mecA negative. By phenotypic D-test method, 32.3% revealed inducible resistance and recorded as D and D(+). Sensitive and constitutive phenotypes were found in 54.8% and 12.9% of isolates respectively. Inducible clindamycin resistance was more prevalent in MRSA (29%) than MSSA isolates (2.4%). Among studied erm genes, the most frequency genes were ermA and ermC with 41.1% and 17.7% respectively. Three isolates of them had D phenotype, while the PCR results of erm genes were negative. All isolates were negative for ermB or msrA genes. CONCLUSION: Since S. aureus isolates with inducible resistance may mutate and change to constitutive resistance, to prevent treatment failure, we suggest that inducible resistance test be performed on erythromycin resistant/clindamycin sensitive isolates. Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2014-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4411429/ /pubmed/25926961 Text en Copyright: © Iranian Journal of Microbiology & Tehran University of Medical Sciences This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.
spellingShingle Medical Sciences
Moosavian, Mojtaba
Shoja, Saeed
Rostami, Soodabeh
Torabipour, Maryam
Farshadzadeh, Zahra
Inducible clindamycin resistance in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus due to erm genes, Iran
title Inducible clindamycin resistance in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus due to erm genes, Iran
title_full Inducible clindamycin resistance in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus due to erm genes, Iran
title_fullStr Inducible clindamycin resistance in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus due to erm genes, Iran
title_full_unstemmed Inducible clindamycin resistance in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus due to erm genes, Iran
title_short Inducible clindamycin resistance in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus due to erm genes, Iran
title_sort inducible clindamycin resistance in clinical isolates of staphylococcus aureus due to erm genes, iran
topic Medical Sciences
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4411429/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25926961
work_keys_str_mv AT moosavianmojtaba inducibleclindamycinresistanceinclinicalisolatesofstaphylococcusaureusduetoermgenesiran
AT shojasaeed inducibleclindamycinresistanceinclinicalisolatesofstaphylococcusaureusduetoermgenesiran
AT rostamisoodabeh inducibleclindamycinresistanceinclinicalisolatesofstaphylococcusaureusduetoermgenesiran
AT torabipourmaryam inducibleclindamycinresistanceinclinicalisolatesofstaphylococcusaureusduetoermgenesiran
AT farshadzadehzahra inducibleclindamycinresistanceinclinicalisolatesofstaphylococcusaureusduetoermgenesiran