Cargando…
Comparison of the Corneal Power Measurements with the TMS4-Topographer, Pentacam HR, IOL Master, and Javal Keratometer
PURPOSE: The aim was to compare the corneal curvature and power measured with a corneal topographer, Scheimpflug camera, optical biometer, and Javal keratometer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 76 myopic individuals who were candidates for photorefractive keratectomy were selected in a cross-secti...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4411623/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25949084 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-9233.151884 |
_version_ | 1782368507292286976 |
---|---|
author | Dehnavi, Zahra Khabazkhoob, Mehdi Mirzajani, Ali Jabbarvand, Mahmood Yekta, Abbasali Jafarzadehpur, Ebrahim |
author_facet | Dehnavi, Zahra Khabazkhoob, Mehdi Mirzajani, Ali Jabbarvand, Mahmood Yekta, Abbasali Jafarzadehpur, Ebrahim |
author_sort | Dehnavi, Zahra |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The aim was to compare the corneal curvature and power measured with a corneal topographer, Scheimpflug camera, optical biometer, and Javal keratometer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 76 myopic individuals who were candidates for photorefractive keratectomy were selected in a cross-sectional study. Manual keratometry (Javal Schiotz type; Haag-Streit AG, Koeniz, Switzerland), automated keratometry (IOL Master version 3.02, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany), topography (TMS4, Tomey, Erlangen, Germany), and Pentacam HR (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany) were performed for all participants. The 95% limits of agreement (LOAs) were reported to evaluate the agreement between devices. RESULTS: The mean corneal power measurements were 44.3 ± 1.59, 44.25 ± 1.59, 43.68 ± 1.44, and 44.31 ± 1.61 D with a Javal keratometer, TMS4-topographer, the Pentacam and IOL Master respectively. Only the IOL Master showed no significant difference with Javal keratometer in measuring the corneal power (P = 0.965). The correlations of the Javal keratometer with TMS4-topography, Pentacam, and IOL Master was 0.991. 0.982, and 0.993 respectively. The 95% LOAs of the Javal keratometer with TMS4-topography, Pentacam, and IOL Master were − 0.361 to 0.49, −0.01 to 1.14, and − 0.36 to 0.36 D, respectively. CONCLUSION: Although the correlation of Pentacam, TMS4-topography, IOL Master, and Javal keratometer in measuring keratometry was high, only the IOL Master showed no significant difference with the Javal keratometer. The IOL Master had the best agreement with Javal keratometry. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4411623 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44116232015-05-06 Comparison of the Corneal Power Measurements with the TMS4-Topographer, Pentacam HR, IOL Master, and Javal Keratometer Dehnavi, Zahra Khabazkhoob, Mehdi Mirzajani, Ali Jabbarvand, Mahmood Yekta, Abbasali Jafarzadehpur, Ebrahim Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOSE: The aim was to compare the corneal curvature and power measured with a corneal topographer, Scheimpflug camera, optical biometer, and Javal keratometer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 76 myopic individuals who were candidates for photorefractive keratectomy were selected in a cross-sectional study. Manual keratometry (Javal Schiotz type; Haag-Streit AG, Koeniz, Switzerland), automated keratometry (IOL Master version 3.02, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany), topography (TMS4, Tomey, Erlangen, Germany), and Pentacam HR (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany) were performed for all participants. The 95% limits of agreement (LOAs) were reported to evaluate the agreement between devices. RESULTS: The mean corneal power measurements were 44.3 ± 1.59, 44.25 ± 1.59, 43.68 ± 1.44, and 44.31 ± 1.61 D with a Javal keratometer, TMS4-topographer, the Pentacam and IOL Master respectively. Only the IOL Master showed no significant difference with Javal keratometer in measuring the corneal power (P = 0.965). The correlations of the Javal keratometer with TMS4-topography, Pentacam, and IOL Master was 0.991. 0.982, and 0.993 respectively. The 95% LOAs of the Javal keratometer with TMS4-topography, Pentacam, and IOL Master were − 0.361 to 0.49, −0.01 to 1.14, and − 0.36 to 0.36 D, respectively. CONCLUSION: Although the correlation of Pentacam, TMS4-topography, IOL Master, and Javal keratometer in measuring keratometry was high, only the IOL Master showed no significant difference with the Javal keratometer. The IOL Master had the best agreement with Javal keratometry. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4411623/ /pubmed/25949084 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-9233.151884 Text en Copyright: © Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Dehnavi, Zahra Khabazkhoob, Mehdi Mirzajani, Ali Jabbarvand, Mahmood Yekta, Abbasali Jafarzadehpur, Ebrahim Comparison of the Corneal Power Measurements with the TMS4-Topographer, Pentacam HR, IOL Master, and Javal Keratometer |
title | Comparison of the Corneal Power Measurements with the TMS4-Topographer, Pentacam HR, IOL Master, and Javal Keratometer |
title_full | Comparison of the Corneal Power Measurements with the TMS4-Topographer, Pentacam HR, IOL Master, and Javal Keratometer |
title_fullStr | Comparison of the Corneal Power Measurements with the TMS4-Topographer, Pentacam HR, IOL Master, and Javal Keratometer |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the Corneal Power Measurements with the TMS4-Topographer, Pentacam HR, IOL Master, and Javal Keratometer |
title_short | Comparison of the Corneal Power Measurements with the TMS4-Topographer, Pentacam HR, IOL Master, and Javal Keratometer |
title_sort | comparison of the corneal power measurements with the tms4-topographer, pentacam hr, iol master, and javal keratometer |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4411623/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25949084 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-9233.151884 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dehnavizahra comparisonofthecornealpowermeasurementswiththetms4topographerpentacamhriolmasterandjavalkeratometer AT khabazkhoobmehdi comparisonofthecornealpowermeasurementswiththetms4topographerpentacamhriolmasterandjavalkeratometer AT mirzajaniali comparisonofthecornealpowermeasurementswiththetms4topographerpentacamhriolmasterandjavalkeratometer AT jabbarvandmahmood comparisonofthecornealpowermeasurementswiththetms4topographerpentacamhriolmasterandjavalkeratometer AT yektaabbasali comparisonofthecornealpowermeasurementswiththetms4topographerpentacamhriolmasterandjavalkeratometer AT jafarzadehpurebrahim comparisonofthecornealpowermeasurementswiththetms4topographerpentacamhriolmasterandjavalkeratometer |