Cargando…
Conditions potentially sensitive to a Personal Health Record (PHR) intervention, a systematic review
BACKGROUND: Personal Health Records (PHRs) are electronic health records controlled, shared or maintained by patients to support patient centered care. The potential for PHRs to transform health care is significant; however, PHRs do not always achieve their potential. One reason for this may be that...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4411701/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25927384 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-015-0159-1 |
_version_ | 1782368523771707392 |
---|---|
author | Price, Morgan Bellwood, Paule Kitson, Nicole Davies, Iryna Weber, Jens Lau, Francis |
author_facet | Price, Morgan Bellwood, Paule Kitson, Nicole Davies, Iryna Weber, Jens Lau, Francis |
author_sort | Price, Morgan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Personal Health Records (PHRs) are electronic health records controlled, shared or maintained by patients to support patient centered care. The potential for PHRs to transform health care is significant; however, PHRs do not always achieve their potential. One reason for this may be that not all health conditions are sensitive to the PHR as an intervention. The goal of this review was to discover which conditions were potentially sensitive to the PHR as an intervention, that is, what conditions have empirical evidence of benefit from PHR-enabled management. METHODS: A systematic review of Medline and CINAHL was completed to find articles assessing PHR use and benefit from 2008 to 2014 in specific health conditions. Two researchers independently screened and coded articles. Health conditions with evidence of benefit from PHR use were identified from the included studies. RESULTS: 23 papers were included. Seven papers were RCTs. Ten health conditions were identified, seven of which had documented benefit associated with PHR use: asthma, diabetes, fertility, glaucoma, HIV, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension. Reported benefits were seen in terms of care quality, access, and productivity, although many benefits were measured by self-report through quasi-experimental studies. No study examined morbidity/mortality. No study reported harm from the PHR. CONCLUSION: There is a small body of condition specific evidence that has been published. Conditions with evidence of benefit when using PHRs tended to be chronic conditions with a feedback loop between monitoring in the PHR and direct behaviours that could be self-managed. These findings can point to other potentially PHR sensitive health conditions and guide PHR designers, implementers, and researchers. More research is needed to link PHR design, features, adoption and health outcomes to better understand how and if PHRs are making a difference to health outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4411701 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44117012015-04-29 Conditions potentially sensitive to a Personal Health Record (PHR) intervention, a systematic review Price, Morgan Bellwood, Paule Kitson, Nicole Davies, Iryna Weber, Jens Lau, Francis BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research Article BACKGROUND: Personal Health Records (PHRs) are electronic health records controlled, shared or maintained by patients to support patient centered care. The potential for PHRs to transform health care is significant; however, PHRs do not always achieve their potential. One reason for this may be that not all health conditions are sensitive to the PHR as an intervention. The goal of this review was to discover which conditions were potentially sensitive to the PHR as an intervention, that is, what conditions have empirical evidence of benefit from PHR-enabled management. METHODS: A systematic review of Medline and CINAHL was completed to find articles assessing PHR use and benefit from 2008 to 2014 in specific health conditions. Two researchers independently screened and coded articles. Health conditions with evidence of benefit from PHR use were identified from the included studies. RESULTS: 23 papers were included. Seven papers were RCTs. Ten health conditions were identified, seven of which had documented benefit associated with PHR use: asthma, diabetes, fertility, glaucoma, HIV, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension. Reported benefits were seen in terms of care quality, access, and productivity, although many benefits were measured by self-report through quasi-experimental studies. No study examined morbidity/mortality. No study reported harm from the PHR. CONCLUSION: There is a small body of condition specific evidence that has been published. Conditions with evidence of benefit when using PHRs tended to be chronic conditions with a feedback loop between monitoring in the PHR and direct behaviours that could be self-managed. These findings can point to other potentially PHR sensitive health conditions and guide PHR designers, implementers, and researchers. More research is needed to link PHR design, features, adoption and health outcomes to better understand how and if PHRs are making a difference to health outcomes. BioMed Central 2015-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4411701/ /pubmed/25927384 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-015-0159-1 Text en © Price et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Price, Morgan Bellwood, Paule Kitson, Nicole Davies, Iryna Weber, Jens Lau, Francis Conditions potentially sensitive to a Personal Health Record (PHR) intervention, a systematic review |
title | Conditions potentially sensitive to a Personal Health Record (PHR) intervention, a systematic review |
title_full | Conditions potentially sensitive to a Personal Health Record (PHR) intervention, a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Conditions potentially sensitive to a Personal Health Record (PHR) intervention, a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Conditions potentially sensitive to a Personal Health Record (PHR) intervention, a systematic review |
title_short | Conditions potentially sensitive to a Personal Health Record (PHR) intervention, a systematic review |
title_sort | conditions potentially sensitive to a personal health record (phr) intervention, a systematic review |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4411701/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25927384 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-015-0159-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pricemorgan conditionspotentiallysensitivetoapersonalhealthrecordphrinterventionasystematicreview AT bellwoodpaule conditionspotentiallysensitivetoapersonalhealthrecordphrinterventionasystematicreview AT kitsonnicole conditionspotentiallysensitivetoapersonalhealthrecordphrinterventionasystematicreview AT daviesiryna conditionspotentiallysensitivetoapersonalhealthrecordphrinterventionasystematicreview AT weberjens conditionspotentiallysensitivetoapersonalhealthrecordphrinterventionasystematicreview AT laufrancis conditionspotentiallysensitivetoapersonalhealthrecordphrinterventionasystematicreview |