Cargando…

Comparison of margin of safety following two different techniques of preoxygenation

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Shortening the duration of efficacious preoxygenation would provide benefit in emergency situations like fetal distress etc. This study aims to compare the margin of safety following preoxygenation using 8 vital capacity breaths (VCB) in 1 min and tidal volume breathing (TVB) fo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rajan, Sunil, Mohan, Prasanth, Paul, Jerry, Cherian, Abraham
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4411827/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25948894
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9185.155142
_version_ 1782368551434190848
author Rajan, Sunil
Mohan, Prasanth
Paul, Jerry
Cherian, Abraham
author_facet Rajan, Sunil
Mohan, Prasanth
Paul, Jerry
Cherian, Abraham
author_sort Rajan, Sunil
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Shortening the duration of efficacious preoxygenation would provide benefit in emergency situations like fetal distress etc. This study aims to compare the margin of safety following preoxygenation using 8 vital capacity breaths (VCB) in 1 min and tidal volume breathing (TVB) for 3 min, by assessing changes in PaO(2) and apnea induced desaturation time. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients were randomly divided into Group A and B. In Group A, 3 min of TVB using O(2) flow of 5 l/min and in Group B, 8 VCB in 60 s using O(2) flow of 10 l/min were used. Anesthesia was induced in all patients with propofol followed by succinylcholine 2 mg/kg intravenously. Mask ventilation was not done and following intubation endotracheal tube was kept open to atmosphere. The time taken for the patients to desaturate to 90% was noted and immediately ventilation was resumed. Arterial blood gas samples were taken while patients were breathing room air, immediately after preoxygenation and at 90% desaturation. RESULTS: Baseline PaO(2) of both the groups were comparable. After preoxygenation Group B had a significantly high PaO(2) value than Group A (439.05 ± 62.20 vs. 345.16 ± 20.80). At 90% desaturation there was no significant difference between groups. Group B showed a significantly high apnea induced desaturation time when compared to Group A (6.87 ± 1.78 vs. 3.47 ± 0.38 min). CONCLUSIONS: Preoxygenation by 8 VCB in 1 min provides a greater margin of safety, as it results in a significantly high PaO(2) with an almost doubled apnea induced desaturation time, in comparison with TVB for 3 min.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4411827
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44118272015-05-06 Comparison of margin of safety following two different techniques of preoxygenation Rajan, Sunil Mohan, Prasanth Paul, Jerry Cherian, Abraham J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol Original Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Shortening the duration of efficacious preoxygenation would provide benefit in emergency situations like fetal distress etc. This study aims to compare the margin of safety following preoxygenation using 8 vital capacity breaths (VCB) in 1 min and tidal volume breathing (TVB) for 3 min, by assessing changes in PaO(2) and apnea induced desaturation time. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients were randomly divided into Group A and B. In Group A, 3 min of TVB using O(2) flow of 5 l/min and in Group B, 8 VCB in 60 s using O(2) flow of 10 l/min were used. Anesthesia was induced in all patients with propofol followed by succinylcholine 2 mg/kg intravenously. Mask ventilation was not done and following intubation endotracheal tube was kept open to atmosphere. The time taken for the patients to desaturate to 90% was noted and immediately ventilation was resumed. Arterial blood gas samples were taken while patients were breathing room air, immediately after preoxygenation and at 90% desaturation. RESULTS: Baseline PaO(2) of both the groups were comparable. After preoxygenation Group B had a significantly high PaO(2) value than Group A (439.05 ± 62.20 vs. 345.16 ± 20.80). At 90% desaturation there was no significant difference between groups. Group B showed a significantly high apnea induced desaturation time when compared to Group A (6.87 ± 1.78 vs. 3.47 ± 0.38 min). CONCLUSIONS: Preoxygenation by 8 VCB in 1 min provides a greater margin of safety, as it results in a significantly high PaO(2) with an almost doubled apnea induced desaturation time, in comparison with TVB for 3 min. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4411827/ /pubmed/25948894 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9185.155142 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Rajan, Sunil
Mohan, Prasanth
Paul, Jerry
Cherian, Abraham
Comparison of margin of safety following two different techniques of preoxygenation
title Comparison of margin of safety following two different techniques of preoxygenation
title_full Comparison of margin of safety following two different techniques of preoxygenation
title_fullStr Comparison of margin of safety following two different techniques of preoxygenation
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of margin of safety following two different techniques of preoxygenation
title_short Comparison of margin of safety following two different techniques of preoxygenation
title_sort comparison of margin of safety following two different techniques of preoxygenation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4411827/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25948894
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9185.155142
work_keys_str_mv AT rajansunil comparisonofmarginofsafetyfollowingtwodifferenttechniquesofpreoxygenation
AT mohanprasanth comparisonofmarginofsafetyfollowingtwodifferenttechniquesofpreoxygenation
AT pauljerry comparisonofmarginofsafetyfollowingtwodifferenttechniquesofpreoxygenation
AT cherianabraham comparisonofmarginofsafetyfollowingtwodifferenttechniquesofpreoxygenation