Cargando…
Efficacy of contrasting background on a drug label: A prospective, randomized study
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Medication error can occur due to fault at any level starting from manufacturing until the administration to the patient. It can be difficult to read the drug name and other information from an ampoule, if there is poor contrast between the font color and background of the ampou...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4411840/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25948907 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9185.155154 |
_version_ | 1782368554432069632 |
---|---|
author | Gupta, Babita Gupta, Surender Kumar Suri, Saurabh Farooque, Kamran Yadav, Naveen Misra, Mahesh |
author_facet | Gupta, Babita Gupta, Surender Kumar Suri, Saurabh Farooque, Kamran Yadav, Naveen Misra, Mahesh |
author_sort | Gupta, Babita |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Medication error can occur due to fault at any level starting from manufacturing until the administration to the patient. It can be difficult to read the drug name and other information from an ampoule, if there is poor contrast between the font color and background of the ampoule. Primary aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the contrast color on the ampoule's label. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was conducted in a randomized blinded manner at a tertiary level trauma center. One hundred and eight resident doctors participated in the study. All the participants were divided into two groups after randomization. Group A was given the original drug ampoule while the modified ampoule with contrast was given to Group B. Total time in reading the ampoule and difficulty in reading (DR) scoring were noted for each participant. Another scoring regarding correct reading of ampoule was also noted and compared. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Student's t-test and Mann–Whitney test were used accordingly and P < 0.05 was considered as significant. RESULTS: It was found that mean time taken in reading the original ampoule was more compared to modified ampoule (11.64 ± 1.48 vs. 9.48 ± 1.62 seconds P < 0.05). DR score was also higher in Group A (P < 0.05) and correct reading score was more in Group B (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The labels on drug ampoules or vials should always have a contrasting background. This may reduce medication error and improve patient safety. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4411840 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44118402015-05-06 Efficacy of contrasting background on a drug label: A prospective, randomized study Gupta, Babita Gupta, Surender Kumar Suri, Saurabh Farooque, Kamran Yadav, Naveen Misra, Mahesh J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol Original Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Medication error can occur due to fault at any level starting from manufacturing until the administration to the patient. It can be difficult to read the drug name and other information from an ampoule, if there is poor contrast between the font color and background of the ampoule. Primary aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the contrast color on the ampoule's label. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was conducted in a randomized blinded manner at a tertiary level trauma center. One hundred and eight resident doctors participated in the study. All the participants were divided into two groups after randomization. Group A was given the original drug ampoule while the modified ampoule with contrast was given to Group B. Total time in reading the ampoule and difficulty in reading (DR) scoring were noted for each participant. Another scoring regarding correct reading of ampoule was also noted and compared. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Student's t-test and Mann–Whitney test were used accordingly and P < 0.05 was considered as significant. RESULTS: It was found that mean time taken in reading the original ampoule was more compared to modified ampoule (11.64 ± 1.48 vs. 9.48 ± 1.62 seconds P < 0.05). DR score was also higher in Group A (P < 0.05) and correct reading score was more in Group B (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The labels on drug ampoules or vials should always have a contrasting background. This may reduce medication error and improve patient safety. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4411840/ /pubmed/25948907 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9185.155154 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Gupta, Babita Gupta, Surender Kumar Suri, Saurabh Farooque, Kamran Yadav, Naveen Misra, Mahesh Efficacy of contrasting background on a drug label: A prospective, randomized study |
title | Efficacy of contrasting background on a drug label: A prospective, randomized study |
title_full | Efficacy of contrasting background on a drug label: A prospective, randomized study |
title_fullStr | Efficacy of contrasting background on a drug label: A prospective, randomized study |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy of contrasting background on a drug label: A prospective, randomized study |
title_short | Efficacy of contrasting background on a drug label: A prospective, randomized study |
title_sort | efficacy of contrasting background on a drug label: a prospective, randomized study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4411840/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25948907 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9185.155154 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guptababita efficacyofcontrastingbackgroundonadruglabelaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT guptasurenderkumar efficacyofcontrastingbackgroundonadruglabelaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT surisaurabh efficacyofcontrastingbackgroundonadruglabelaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT farooquekamran efficacyofcontrastingbackgroundonadruglabelaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT yadavnaveen efficacyofcontrastingbackgroundonadruglabelaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT misramahesh efficacyofcontrastingbackgroundonadruglabelaprospectiverandomizedstudy |