Cargando…

Comparison of cellular toxicity caused by ambient ultrafine particles and engineered metal oxide nanoparticles

OBJECTIVE: The development of nanotechnology has spurred concerns about the health effects of exposure to nanoparticles (NPs) and ultrafine particles (UFPs). Toxicological data on NPs and UFPs may provide evidence to support the development of regulations to reduce the risk of particle exposure. We...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lu, Senlin, Zhang, Wenchao, Zhang, Rui, Liu, Pinwei, Wang, Qiangxiang, Shang, Yu, Wu, Minghong, Donaldson, Ken, Wang, Qingyue
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4412114/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25888760
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12989-015-0082-8
_version_ 1782368608714752000
author Lu, Senlin
Zhang, Wenchao
Zhang, Rui
Liu, Pinwei
Wang, Qiangxiang
Shang, Yu
Wu, Minghong
Donaldson, Ken
Wang, Qingyue
author_facet Lu, Senlin
Zhang, Wenchao
Zhang, Rui
Liu, Pinwei
Wang, Qiangxiang
Shang, Yu
Wu, Minghong
Donaldson, Ken
Wang, Qingyue
author_sort Lu, Senlin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The development of nanotechnology has spurred concerns about the health effects of exposure to nanoparticles (NPs) and ultrafine particles (UFPs). Toxicological data on NPs and UFPs may provide evidence to support the development of regulations to reduce the risk of particle exposure. We tried to provide fundamental data to determine differences in cytotoxicity induced by ambient UFPs and engineered metal oxide NPs (ZnO, NiO, and CeO(2)). METHODS: UFPs were sampled by using of a nano micro-orifice uniform deposit impactor. Physicochemical characterization of the UFPs and nano metal oxide particles were studied by scanning electron microscopy and transmission electron microscopy. Cellular toxicity induced by the different particles was assessed by using of comprehensive approaches and compared after A549 cells were exposured to the particles. RESULTS: All of the measured particles could damage A549 cells at concentrations ranging from 25 to 200 μg/mL. The lowest survival ratio and the highest lactate dehydrogenase level were caused by nano-ZnO particles, but the highest levels of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) and percentages of apoptosis were observed in cells treated with the soluble fraction of ambient fine particles (PM(1.8)) at 200 μg/mL. Relatively high concentrations of anthropogenic metals, including Zn, Ni, Fe, and Cu, may be responsible for the higher toxicity of fine ambient particles compared with the ambient coarse particles and UFPs. The selected heavy metals (Zn, Ni, Fe, and Cu) were found to be located in the perinuclear and cytoplasmic areas of A549 cells. The distribution pattern of metals from ambient particles showed that distributions of the metals in A549 cells were not uniform and followed the pattern Cu > Zn > Fe > Ni, suggesting that Cu was absorbed by A549 cells more easily than the other metals. CONCLUSIONS: Metal nanoparticles oxides and UFPs at low concentration could damage to cells, but the manufactured metal oxide nanoparticles are not highly toxic to lung cells compared to environmental particles. The local concentration effect of heavy metals in A549 cells, as well as the induction of oxidative stress by the particles, may be responsible for the damage observed to the cells. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12989-015-0082-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4412114
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44121142015-04-29 Comparison of cellular toxicity caused by ambient ultrafine particles and engineered metal oxide nanoparticles Lu, Senlin Zhang, Wenchao Zhang, Rui Liu, Pinwei Wang, Qiangxiang Shang, Yu Wu, Minghong Donaldson, Ken Wang, Qingyue Part Fibre Toxicol Research OBJECTIVE: The development of nanotechnology has spurred concerns about the health effects of exposure to nanoparticles (NPs) and ultrafine particles (UFPs). Toxicological data on NPs and UFPs may provide evidence to support the development of regulations to reduce the risk of particle exposure. We tried to provide fundamental data to determine differences in cytotoxicity induced by ambient UFPs and engineered metal oxide NPs (ZnO, NiO, and CeO(2)). METHODS: UFPs were sampled by using of a nano micro-orifice uniform deposit impactor. Physicochemical characterization of the UFPs and nano metal oxide particles were studied by scanning electron microscopy and transmission electron microscopy. Cellular toxicity induced by the different particles was assessed by using of comprehensive approaches and compared after A549 cells were exposured to the particles. RESULTS: All of the measured particles could damage A549 cells at concentrations ranging from 25 to 200 μg/mL. The lowest survival ratio and the highest lactate dehydrogenase level were caused by nano-ZnO particles, but the highest levels of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) and percentages of apoptosis were observed in cells treated with the soluble fraction of ambient fine particles (PM(1.8)) at 200 μg/mL. Relatively high concentrations of anthropogenic metals, including Zn, Ni, Fe, and Cu, may be responsible for the higher toxicity of fine ambient particles compared with the ambient coarse particles and UFPs. The selected heavy metals (Zn, Ni, Fe, and Cu) were found to be located in the perinuclear and cytoplasmic areas of A549 cells. The distribution pattern of metals from ambient particles showed that distributions of the metals in A549 cells were not uniform and followed the pattern Cu > Zn > Fe > Ni, suggesting that Cu was absorbed by A549 cells more easily than the other metals. CONCLUSIONS: Metal nanoparticles oxides and UFPs at low concentration could damage to cells, but the manufactured metal oxide nanoparticles are not highly toxic to lung cells compared to environmental particles. The local concentration effect of heavy metals in A549 cells, as well as the induction of oxidative stress by the particles, may be responsible for the damage observed to the cells. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12989-015-0082-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4412114/ /pubmed/25888760 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12989-015-0082-8 Text en © Lu et al. ; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Lu, Senlin
Zhang, Wenchao
Zhang, Rui
Liu, Pinwei
Wang, Qiangxiang
Shang, Yu
Wu, Minghong
Donaldson, Ken
Wang, Qingyue
Comparison of cellular toxicity caused by ambient ultrafine particles and engineered metal oxide nanoparticles
title Comparison of cellular toxicity caused by ambient ultrafine particles and engineered metal oxide nanoparticles
title_full Comparison of cellular toxicity caused by ambient ultrafine particles and engineered metal oxide nanoparticles
title_fullStr Comparison of cellular toxicity caused by ambient ultrafine particles and engineered metal oxide nanoparticles
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of cellular toxicity caused by ambient ultrafine particles and engineered metal oxide nanoparticles
title_short Comparison of cellular toxicity caused by ambient ultrafine particles and engineered metal oxide nanoparticles
title_sort comparison of cellular toxicity caused by ambient ultrafine particles and engineered metal oxide nanoparticles
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4412114/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25888760
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12989-015-0082-8
work_keys_str_mv AT lusenlin comparisonofcellulartoxicitycausedbyambientultrafineparticlesandengineeredmetaloxidenanoparticles
AT zhangwenchao comparisonofcellulartoxicitycausedbyambientultrafineparticlesandengineeredmetaloxidenanoparticles
AT zhangrui comparisonofcellulartoxicitycausedbyambientultrafineparticlesandengineeredmetaloxidenanoparticles
AT liupinwei comparisonofcellulartoxicitycausedbyambientultrafineparticlesandengineeredmetaloxidenanoparticles
AT wangqiangxiang comparisonofcellulartoxicitycausedbyambientultrafineparticlesandengineeredmetaloxidenanoparticles
AT shangyu comparisonofcellulartoxicitycausedbyambientultrafineparticlesandengineeredmetaloxidenanoparticles
AT wuminghong comparisonofcellulartoxicitycausedbyambientultrafineparticlesandengineeredmetaloxidenanoparticles
AT donaldsonken comparisonofcellulartoxicitycausedbyambientultrafineparticlesandengineeredmetaloxidenanoparticles
AT wangqingyue comparisonofcellulartoxicitycausedbyambientultrafineparticlesandengineeredmetaloxidenanoparticles