Cargando…

Exercise Physiology and Pulmonary Hemodynamic Abnormality in PH Patients with Exercise Induced Venous-To-Systemic Shunt

OBJECTIVES: To identify the pulmonary hypertension (PH) patients who develop an exercise induced venous-to-systemic shunt (EIS) by performing the cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET), analyse the changes of CPET measurements during exercise and compare the exercise physiology and resting pulmonary h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guo, Jian, Shi, Xue, Yang, Wenlan, Gong, Sugang, Zhao, Qinhua, Wang, Lan, He, Jing, Shi, Xiaofang, Sun, Xingguo, Liu, Jinming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4412481/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25918847
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121690
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: To identify the pulmonary hypertension (PH) patients who develop an exercise induced venous-to-systemic shunt (EIS) by performing the cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET), analyse the changes of CPET measurements during exercise and compare the exercise physiology and resting pulmonary hemodynamics between shunt-PH and no-shunt-PH patients. METHODS: Retrospectively, resting pulmonary function test (PFT), right heart catheterization (RHC), and CPET for clinical evaluation of 104 PH patients were studied. RESULTS: Considering all 104 PH patients by three investigators, 37 were early EIS+, 61 were EIS-, 3 were late EIS+, and 3 others were placed in the discordant group. PeakVO(2), AT and OUES were all reduced in the shunt-PH patients compared with the no-shunt-PH subjects, whereas VE/VCO(2) slope and the lowest VE/VCO(2) increased. Besides, the changes and the response characteristics of the key CPET parameters at the beginning of exercise in the shunt group were notably different from those of the no shunt one. At cardiac catheterization, the shunt patients had significantly increased mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP), mean right atrial pressure (mRAP) and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR), reduced cardiac output (CO) and cardiac index (CI) compared with the no shunt ones (P<0.05). Resting CO was significantly correlated with exercise parameters of AT (r = 0.527, P<0.001), OUES (r = 0.410, P<0.001) and Peak VO(2) (r = 0.405, P<0.001). PVR was significantly, but weakly, correlated with the above mentioned CPET parameters. IN CONCLUSIONS: CPET may allow a non-invasive method for detecting an EIS and assessing the severity of the disease in PH patients.