Cargando…
Filgrastim, lenograstim and pegfilgrastim in the mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells in patients with lymphoproliferative malignancies
Patients with lymphoproliferative disorders, candidate to autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), require mobilization with chemotherapy and granulocyte colony -stimulating factor (G-CSF). This study looked for differences in hematopoietic peripheral stem cells (HPSCs) mobilization in response...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4412650/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24722996 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10238-014-0282-9 |
_version_ | 1782368698787430400 |
---|---|
author | Ria, Roberto Reale, Antonia Melaccio, Assunta Racanelli, Vito Dammacco, Franco Vacca, Angelo |
author_facet | Ria, Roberto Reale, Antonia Melaccio, Assunta Racanelli, Vito Dammacco, Franco Vacca, Angelo |
author_sort | Ria, Roberto |
collection | PubMed |
description | Patients with lymphoproliferative disorders, candidate to autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), require mobilization with chemotherapy and granulocyte colony -stimulating factor (G-CSF). This study looked for differences in hematopoietic peripheral stem cells (HPSCs) mobilization in response to the three available G-CSFs, namely lenograstim, filgrastim, and pegfilgrastim. Between 2000 and 2012, 146 patients (66 M and 80 F) who underwent ASCT for multiple myeloma, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma or Hodgkin’s lymphoma were studied. All patients received induction therapy and then a mobilization regimen with cyclophosphamide plus lenograstim, or filgrastim, or pegfilgrastim. From days 12 to 14, HPSCs were collected by two to three daily leukaphereses. Our results show that high-dose cyclophosphamide plus lenograstim achieved adequate mobilization and the collection target more quickly and with fewer leukaphereses as compared to filgrastim and pegfilgrastim. No differences between the three regimens were observed regarding toxicity and days to WBC and platelet recovery. Thus, lenograstim may represent the ideal G-CSF for PBSC mobilization in patients with lymphoproliferative diseases. Further studies are needed to confirm these results and better understand the biological bases of these differences. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4412650 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44126502015-05-06 Filgrastim, lenograstim and pegfilgrastim in the mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells in patients with lymphoproliferative malignancies Ria, Roberto Reale, Antonia Melaccio, Assunta Racanelli, Vito Dammacco, Franco Vacca, Angelo Clin Exp Med Original Article Patients with lymphoproliferative disorders, candidate to autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), require mobilization with chemotherapy and granulocyte colony -stimulating factor (G-CSF). This study looked for differences in hematopoietic peripheral stem cells (HPSCs) mobilization in response to the three available G-CSFs, namely lenograstim, filgrastim, and pegfilgrastim. Between 2000 and 2012, 146 patients (66 M and 80 F) who underwent ASCT for multiple myeloma, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma or Hodgkin’s lymphoma were studied. All patients received induction therapy and then a mobilization regimen with cyclophosphamide plus lenograstim, or filgrastim, or pegfilgrastim. From days 12 to 14, HPSCs were collected by two to three daily leukaphereses. Our results show that high-dose cyclophosphamide plus lenograstim achieved adequate mobilization and the collection target more quickly and with fewer leukaphereses as compared to filgrastim and pegfilgrastim. No differences between the three regimens were observed regarding toxicity and days to WBC and platelet recovery. Thus, lenograstim may represent the ideal G-CSF for PBSC mobilization in patients with lymphoproliferative diseases. Further studies are needed to confirm these results and better understand the biological bases of these differences. Springer International Publishing 2014-04-11 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4412650/ /pubmed/24722996 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10238-014-0282-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Ria, Roberto Reale, Antonia Melaccio, Assunta Racanelli, Vito Dammacco, Franco Vacca, Angelo Filgrastim, lenograstim and pegfilgrastim in the mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells in patients with lymphoproliferative malignancies |
title | Filgrastim, lenograstim and pegfilgrastim in the mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells in patients with lymphoproliferative malignancies |
title_full | Filgrastim, lenograstim and pegfilgrastim in the mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells in patients with lymphoproliferative malignancies |
title_fullStr | Filgrastim, lenograstim and pegfilgrastim in the mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells in patients with lymphoproliferative malignancies |
title_full_unstemmed | Filgrastim, lenograstim and pegfilgrastim in the mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells in patients with lymphoproliferative malignancies |
title_short | Filgrastim, lenograstim and pegfilgrastim in the mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells in patients with lymphoproliferative malignancies |
title_sort | filgrastim, lenograstim and pegfilgrastim in the mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells in patients with lymphoproliferative malignancies |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4412650/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24722996 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10238-014-0282-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT riaroberto filgrastimlenograstimandpegfilgrastiminthemobilizationofperipheralbloodprogenitorcellsinpatientswithlymphoproliferativemalignancies AT realeantonia filgrastimlenograstimandpegfilgrastiminthemobilizationofperipheralbloodprogenitorcellsinpatientswithlymphoproliferativemalignancies AT melaccioassunta filgrastimlenograstimandpegfilgrastiminthemobilizationofperipheralbloodprogenitorcellsinpatientswithlymphoproliferativemalignancies AT racanellivito filgrastimlenograstimandpegfilgrastiminthemobilizationofperipheralbloodprogenitorcellsinpatientswithlymphoproliferativemalignancies AT dammaccofranco filgrastimlenograstimandpegfilgrastiminthemobilizationofperipheralbloodprogenitorcellsinpatientswithlymphoproliferativemalignancies AT vaccaangelo filgrastimlenograstimandpegfilgrastiminthemobilizationofperipheralbloodprogenitorcellsinpatientswithlymphoproliferativemalignancies |