Cargando…

Filgrastim, lenograstim and pegfilgrastim in the mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells in patients with lymphoproliferative malignancies

Patients with lymphoproliferative disorders, candidate to autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), require mobilization with chemotherapy and granulocyte colony -stimulating factor (G-CSF). This study looked for differences in hematopoietic peripheral stem cells (HPSCs) mobilization in response...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ria, Roberto, Reale, Antonia, Melaccio, Assunta, Racanelli, Vito, Dammacco, Franco, Vacca, Angelo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4412650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24722996
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10238-014-0282-9
_version_ 1782368698787430400
author Ria, Roberto
Reale, Antonia
Melaccio, Assunta
Racanelli, Vito
Dammacco, Franco
Vacca, Angelo
author_facet Ria, Roberto
Reale, Antonia
Melaccio, Assunta
Racanelli, Vito
Dammacco, Franco
Vacca, Angelo
author_sort Ria, Roberto
collection PubMed
description Patients with lymphoproliferative disorders, candidate to autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), require mobilization with chemotherapy and granulocyte colony -stimulating factor (G-CSF). This study looked for differences in hematopoietic peripheral stem cells (HPSCs) mobilization in response to the three available G-CSFs, namely lenograstim, filgrastim, and pegfilgrastim. Between 2000 and 2012, 146 patients (66 M and 80 F) who underwent ASCT for multiple myeloma, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma or Hodgkin’s lymphoma were studied. All patients received induction therapy and then a mobilization regimen with cyclophosphamide plus lenograstim, or filgrastim, or pegfilgrastim. From days 12 to 14, HPSCs were collected by two to three daily leukaphereses. Our results show that high-dose cyclophosphamide plus lenograstim achieved adequate mobilization and the collection target more quickly and with fewer leukaphereses as compared to filgrastim and pegfilgrastim. No differences between the three regimens were observed regarding toxicity and days to WBC and platelet recovery. Thus, lenograstim may represent the ideal G-CSF for PBSC mobilization in patients with lymphoproliferative diseases. Further studies are needed to confirm these results and better understand the biological bases of these differences.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4412650
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44126502015-05-06 Filgrastim, lenograstim and pegfilgrastim in the mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells in patients with lymphoproliferative malignancies Ria, Roberto Reale, Antonia Melaccio, Assunta Racanelli, Vito Dammacco, Franco Vacca, Angelo Clin Exp Med Original Article Patients with lymphoproliferative disorders, candidate to autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), require mobilization with chemotherapy and granulocyte colony -stimulating factor (G-CSF). This study looked for differences in hematopoietic peripheral stem cells (HPSCs) mobilization in response to the three available G-CSFs, namely lenograstim, filgrastim, and pegfilgrastim. Between 2000 and 2012, 146 patients (66 M and 80 F) who underwent ASCT for multiple myeloma, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma or Hodgkin’s lymphoma were studied. All patients received induction therapy and then a mobilization regimen with cyclophosphamide plus lenograstim, or filgrastim, or pegfilgrastim. From days 12 to 14, HPSCs were collected by two to three daily leukaphereses. Our results show that high-dose cyclophosphamide plus lenograstim achieved adequate mobilization and the collection target more quickly and with fewer leukaphereses as compared to filgrastim and pegfilgrastim. No differences between the three regimens were observed regarding toxicity and days to WBC and platelet recovery. Thus, lenograstim may represent the ideal G-CSF for PBSC mobilization in patients with lymphoproliferative diseases. Further studies are needed to confirm these results and better understand the biological bases of these differences. Springer International Publishing 2014-04-11 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4412650/ /pubmed/24722996 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10238-014-0282-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ria, Roberto
Reale, Antonia
Melaccio, Assunta
Racanelli, Vito
Dammacco, Franco
Vacca, Angelo
Filgrastim, lenograstim and pegfilgrastim in the mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells in patients with lymphoproliferative malignancies
title Filgrastim, lenograstim and pegfilgrastim in the mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells in patients with lymphoproliferative malignancies
title_full Filgrastim, lenograstim and pegfilgrastim in the mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells in patients with lymphoproliferative malignancies
title_fullStr Filgrastim, lenograstim and pegfilgrastim in the mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells in patients with lymphoproliferative malignancies
title_full_unstemmed Filgrastim, lenograstim and pegfilgrastim in the mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells in patients with lymphoproliferative malignancies
title_short Filgrastim, lenograstim and pegfilgrastim in the mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells in patients with lymphoproliferative malignancies
title_sort filgrastim, lenograstim and pegfilgrastim in the mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells in patients with lymphoproliferative malignancies
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4412650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24722996
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10238-014-0282-9
work_keys_str_mv AT riaroberto filgrastimlenograstimandpegfilgrastiminthemobilizationofperipheralbloodprogenitorcellsinpatientswithlymphoproliferativemalignancies
AT realeantonia filgrastimlenograstimandpegfilgrastiminthemobilizationofperipheralbloodprogenitorcellsinpatientswithlymphoproliferativemalignancies
AT melaccioassunta filgrastimlenograstimandpegfilgrastiminthemobilizationofperipheralbloodprogenitorcellsinpatientswithlymphoproliferativemalignancies
AT racanellivito filgrastimlenograstimandpegfilgrastiminthemobilizationofperipheralbloodprogenitorcellsinpatientswithlymphoproliferativemalignancies
AT dammaccofranco filgrastimlenograstimandpegfilgrastiminthemobilizationofperipheralbloodprogenitorcellsinpatientswithlymphoproliferativemalignancies
AT vaccaangelo filgrastimlenograstimandpegfilgrastiminthemobilizationofperipheralbloodprogenitorcellsinpatientswithlymphoproliferativemalignancies