Cargando…

Non-adjacent visual dependency learning in chimpanzees

Humans have a strong proclivity for structuring and patterning stimuli: Whether in space or time, we tend to mentally order stimuli in our environment and organize them into units with specific types of relationships. A crucial prerequisite for such organization is the cognitive ability to discern a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sonnweber, Ruth, Ravignani, Andrea, Fitch, W. Tecumseh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4412729/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25604423
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-015-0840-x
_version_ 1782368716273483776
author Sonnweber, Ruth
Ravignani, Andrea
Fitch, W. Tecumseh
author_facet Sonnweber, Ruth
Ravignani, Andrea
Fitch, W. Tecumseh
author_sort Sonnweber, Ruth
collection PubMed
description Humans have a strong proclivity for structuring and patterning stimuli: Whether in space or time, we tend to mentally order stimuli in our environment and organize them into units with specific types of relationships. A crucial prerequisite for such organization is the cognitive ability to discern and process regularities among multiple stimuli. To investigate the evolutionary roots of this cognitive capacity, we tested chimpanzees—which, along with bonobos, are our closest living relatives—for simple, variable distance dependency processing in visual patterns. We trained chimpanzees to identify pairs of shapes either linked by an arbitrary learned association (arbitrary associative dependency) or a shared feature (same shape, feature-based dependency), and to recognize strings where items related to either of these ways occupied the first (leftmost) and the last (rightmost) item of the stimulus. We then probed the degree to which subjects generalized this pattern to new colors, shapes, and numbers of interspersed items. We found that chimpanzees can learn and generalize both types of dependency rules, indicating that the ability to encode both feature-based and arbitrary associative regularities over variable distances in the visual domain is not a human prerogative. Our results strongly suggest that these core components of human structural processing were already present in our last common ancestor with chimpanzees. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10071-015-0840-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4412729
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44127292015-05-06 Non-adjacent visual dependency learning in chimpanzees Sonnweber, Ruth Ravignani, Andrea Fitch, W. Tecumseh Anim Cogn Original Paper Humans have a strong proclivity for structuring and patterning stimuli: Whether in space or time, we tend to mentally order stimuli in our environment and organize them into units with specific types of relationships. A crucial prerequisite for such organization is the cognitive ability to discern and process regularities among multiple stimuli. To investigate the evolutionary roots of this cognitive capacity, we tested chimpanzees—which, along with bonobos, are our closest living relatives—for simple, variable distance dependency processing in visual patterns. We trained chimpanzees to identify pairs of shapes either linked by an arbitrary learned association (arbitrary associative dependency) or a shared feature (same shape, feature-based dependency), and to recognize strings where items related to either of these ways occupied the first (leftmost) and the last (rightmost) item of the stimulus. We then probed the degree to which subjects generalized this pattern to new colors, shapes, and numbers of interspersed items. We found that chimpanzees can learn and generalize both types of dependency rules, indicating that the ability to encode both feature-based and arbitrary associative regularities over variable distances in the visual domain is not a human prerogative. Our results strongly suggest that these core components of human structural processing were already present in our last common ancestor with chimpanzees. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10071-015-0840-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015-01-21 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4412729/ /pubmed/25604423 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-015-0840-x Text en © The Author(s) 2015 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Sonnweber, Ruth
Ravignani, Andrea
Fitch, W. Tecumseh
Non-adjacent visual dependency learning in chimpanzees
title Non-adjacent visual dependency learning in chimpanzees
title_full Non-adjacent visual dependency learning in chimpanzees
title_fullStr Non-adjacent visual dependency learning in chimpanzees
title_full_unstemmed Non-adjacent visual dependency learning in chimpanzees
title_short Non-adjacent visual dependency learning in chimpanzees
title_sort non-adjacent visual dependency learning in chimpanzees
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4412729/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25604423
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-015-0840-x
work_keys_str_mv AT sonnweberruth nonadjacentvisualdependencylearninginchimpanzees
AT ravignaniandrea nonadjacentvisualdependencylearninginchimpanzees
AT fitchwtecumseh nonadjacentvisualdependencylearninginchimpanzees