Cargando…
Non-adjacent visual dependency learning in chimpanzees
Humans have a strong proclivity for structuring and patterning stimuli: Whether in space or time, we tend to mentally order stimuli in our environment and organize them into units with specific types of relationships. A crucial prerequisite for such organization is the cognitive ability to discern a...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4412729/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25604423 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-015-0840-x |
_version_ | 1782368716273483776 |
---|---|
author | Sonnweber, Ruth Ravignani, Andrea Fitch, W. Tecumseh |
author_facet | Sonnweber, Ruth Ravignani, Andrea Fitch, W. Tecumseh |
author_sort | Sonnweber, Ruth |
collection | PubMed |
description | Humans have a strong proclivity for structuring and patterning stimuli: Whether in space or time, we tend to mentally order stimuli in our environment and organize them into units with specific types of relationships. A crucial prerequisite for such organization is the cognitive ability to discern and process regularities among multiple stimuli. To investigate the evolutionary roots of this cognitive capacity, we tested chimpanzees—which, along with bonobos, are our closest living relatives—for simple, variable distance dependency processing in visual patterns. We trained chimpanzees to identify pairs of shapes either linked by an arbitrary learned association (arbitrary associative dependency) or a shared feature (same shape, feature-based dependency), and to recognize strings where items related to either of these ways occupied the first (leftmost) and the last (rightmost) item of the stimulus. We then probed the degree to which subjects generalized this pattern to new colors, shapes, and numbers of interspersed items. We found that chimpanzees can learn and generalize both types of dependency rules, indicating that the ability to encode both feature-based and arbitrary associative regularities over variable distances in the visual domain is not a human prerogative. Our results strongly suggest that these core components of human structural processing were already present in our last common ancestor with chimpanzees. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10071-015-0840-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4412729 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44127292015-05-06 Non-adjacent visual dependency learning in chimpanzees Sonnweber, Ruth Ravignani, Andrea Fitch, W. Tecumseh Anim Cogn Original Paper Humans have a strong proclivity for structuring and patterning stimuli: Whether in space or time, we tend to mentally order stimuli in our environment and organize them into units with specific types of relationships. A crucial prerequisite for such organization is the cognitive ability to discern and process regularities among multiple stimuli. To investigate the evolutionary roots of this cognitive capacity, we tested chimpanzees—which, along with bonobos, are our closest living relatives—for simple, variable distance dependency processing in visual patterns. We trained chimpanzees to identify pairs of shapes either linked by an arbitrary learned association (arbitrary associative dependency) or a shared feature (same shape, feature-based dependency), and to recognize strings where items related to either of these ways occupied the first (leftmost) and the last (rightmost) item of the stimulus. We then probed the degree to which subjects generalized this pattern to new colors, shapes, and numbers of interspersed items. We found that chimpanzees can learn and generalize both types of dependency rules, indicating that the ability to encode both feature-based and arbitrary associative regularities over variable distances in the visual domain is not a human prerogative. Our results strongly suggest that these core components of human structural processing were already present in our last common ancestor with chimpanzees. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10071-015-0840-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015-01-21 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4412729/ /pubmed/25604423 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-015-0840-x Text en © The Author(s) 2015 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Sonnweber, Ruth Ravignani, Andrea Fitch, W. Tecumseh Non-adjacent visual dependency learning in chimpanzees |
title | Non-adjacent visual dependency learning in chimpanzees |
title_full | Non-adjacent visual dependency learning in chimpanzees |
title_fullStr | Non-adjacent visual dependency learning in chimpanzees |
title_full_unstemmed | Non-adjacent visual dependency learning in chimpanzees |
title_short | Non-adjacent visual dependency learning in chimpanzees |
title_sort | non-adjacent visual dependency learning in chimpanzees |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4412729/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25604423 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-015-0840-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sonnweberruth nonadjacentvisualdependencylearninginchimpanzees AT ravignaniandrea nonadjacentvisualdependencylearninginchimpanzees AT fitchwtecumseh nonadjacentvisualdependencylearninginchimpanzees |