Cargando…

What proportions of focal liver lesions detected by unenhanced ultrasound are inconclusive?

In August 2012, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence produced positive diagnostics guidance on the ultrasound contrast agent SonoVue®, but recommended further research involving an estimation of the proportion of unenhanced ultrasound scans reporting, but not characterising, focal l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Willits, Iain, Burn, Julie, Cole, Helen, Hoare, Tim, Sims, Andrew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4412878/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25949268
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1742271X14562995
_version_ 1782368726099689472
author Willits, Iain
Burn, Julie
Cole, Helen
Hoare, Tim
Sims, Andrew
author_facet Willits, Iain
Burn, Julie
Cole, Helen
Hoare, Tim
Sims, Andrew
author_sort Willits, Iain
collection PubMed
description In August 2012, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence produced positive diagnostics guidance on the ultrasound contrast agent SonoVue®, but recommended further research involving an estimation of the proportion of unenhanced ultrasound scans reporting, but not characterising, focal liver lesions, particularly in cirrhotic livers. Patient records from the Radiology Information System of an acute hospital trust were progressively filtered based on categorical fields and keywords in the free text reports, to obtain ultrasound records including the liver that were appropriate for manual analysis. In total, 21,731 records referred from general practice or out-patient clinics were analysed. Patients described as having cirrhosis were analysed as a subgroup. After automatic exclusion of records considered likely to be negative, 5812 records were manually read and categorised as focal liver lesion inconclusive, benign or malignant. In the general practice cohort of 9175 records, 746 reported the presence of one or more focal liver lesions, with 18.4% (95% CI 15.7% to 21.3%) of these records mentioning an inconclusive focal liver lesion. In the out-patient cohort of 12,556 records, 1437 reported one or more focal liver lesions, and 29.4% (95% CI 26.9% to 32.0%) of these were inconclusive. Cirrhosis was reported in 10.8% of the out-patient scans that also reported a focal liver lesion, and 47.4% (95% CI 39.3% to 55.6%) of these scans had an inconclusive focal liver lesion, compared with 27.3% (95% CI 24.9% to 29.8%) that were inconclusive in non-cirrhotic livers (odds ratio 2.4; 95% CI 1.7 to 3.4). This retrospective study indicates that unenhanced ultrasound scans, in which a focal liver lesion is detected, are frequently inconclusive, with the probability of an inconclusive scan being greater in out-patient than general practice referrals. Inconclusive focal liver lesions were also reported in greater proportions of cirrhotic than non-cirrhotic livers. The results of this research will inform future updates of National Institute for Health and Care Excellence diagnostics guidance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4412878
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44128782015-05-04 What proportions of focal liver lesions detected by unenhanced ultrasound are inconclusive? Willits, Iain Burn, Julie Cole, Helen Hoare, Tim Sims, Andrew Ultrasound Original Research In August 2012, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence produced positive diagnostics guidance on the ultrasound contrast agent SonoVue®, but recommended further research involving an estimation of the proportion of unenhanced ultrasound scans reporting, but not characterising, focal liver lesions, particularly in cirrhotic livers. Patient records from the Radiology Information System of an acute hospital trust were progressively filtered based on categorical fields and keywords in the free text reports, to obtain ultrasound records including the liver that were appropriate for manual analysis. In total, 21,731 records referred from general practice or out-patient clinics were analysed. Patients described as having cirrhosis were analysed as a subgroup. After automatic exclusion of records considered likely to be negative, 5812 records were manually read and categorised as focal liver lesion inconclusive, benign or malignant. In the general practice cohort of 9175 records, 746 reported the presence of one or more focal liver lesions, with 18.4% (95% CI 15.7% to 21.3%) of these records mentioning an inconclusive focal liver lesion. In the out-patient cohort of 12,556 records, 1437 reported one or more focal liver lesions, and 29.4% (95% CI 26.9% to 32.0%) of these were inconclusive. Cirrhosis was reported in 10.8% of the out-patient scans that also reported a focal liver lesion, and 47.4% (95% CI 39.3% to 55.6%) of these scans had an inconclusive focal liver lesion, compared with 27.3% (95% CI 24.9% to 29.8%) that were inconclusive in non-cirrhotic livers (odds ratio 2.4; 95% CI 1.7 to 3.4). This retrospective study indicates that unenhanced ultrasound scans, in which a focal liver lesion is detected, are frequently inconclusive, with the probability of an inconclusive scan being greater in out-patient than general practice referrals. Inconclusive focal liver lesions were also reported in greater proportions of cirrhotic than non-cirrhotic livers. The results of this research will inform future updates of National Institute for Health and Care Excellence diagnostics guidance. SAGE Publications 2014-12-08 2015-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4412878/ /pubmed/25949268 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1742271X14562995 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page(http://www.uk.sagepub.com/aboutus/openaccess.htm).
spellingShingle Original Research
Willits, Iain
Burn, Julie
Cole, Helen
Hoare, Tim
Sims, Andrew
What proportions of focal liver lesions detected by unenhanced ultrasound are inconclusive?
title What proportions of focal liver lesions detected by unenhanced ultrasound are inconclusive?
title_full What proportions of focal liver lesions detected by unenhanced ultrasound are inconclusive?
title_fullStr What proportions of focal liver lesions detected by unenhanced ultrasound are inconclusive?
title_full_unstemmed What proportions of focal liver lesions detected by unenhanced ultrasound are inconclusive?
title_short What proportions of focal liver lesions detected by unenhanced ultrasound are inconclusive?
title_sort what proportions of focal liver lesions detected by unenhanced ultrasound are inconclusive?
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4412878/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25949268
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1742271X14562995
work_keys_str_mv AT willitsiain whatproportionsoffocalliverlesionsdetectedbyunenhancedultrasoundareinconclusive
AT burnjulie whatproportionsoffocalliverlesionsdetectedbyunenhancedultrasoundareinconclusive
AT colehelen whatproportionsoffocalliverlesionsdetectedbyunenhancedultrasoundareinconclusive
AT hoaretim whatproportionsoffocalliverlesionsdetectedbyunenhancedultrasoundareinconclusive
AT simsandrew whatproportionsoffocalliverlesionsdetectedbyunenhancedultrasoundareinconclusive