Cargando…

Quality Evaluation of Five Commercial Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay Kits for Detecting Aflatoxin B(1) in Feedstuffs

The objective of this study was to evaluate the quality of five commercial enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits (A, B, C, D, and E) from different suppliers for detecting aflatoxin B(1) (AFB(1)). AFB(1)-free corn samples supplemented with different levels of AFB(1) (5, 10, and 20 μg/kg) we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sun, Dan-dan, Gu, Xu, Li, Jun-guo, Yao, Ting, Dong, Ying-chao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (AAAP) and Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology (KSAST) 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4413000/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25924961
http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.14.0868
_version_ 1782368742886342656
author Sun, Dan-dan
Gu, Xu
Li, Jun-guo
Yao, Ting
Dong, Ying-chao
author_facet Sun, Dan-dan
Gu, Xu
Li, Jun-guo
Yao, Ting
Dong, Ying-chao
author_sort Sun, Dan-dan
collection PubMed
description The objective of this study was to evaluate the quality of five commercial enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits (A, B, C, D, and E) from different suppliers for detecting aflatoxin B(1) (AFB(1)). AFB(1)-free corn samples supplemented with different levels of AFB(1) (5, 10, and 20 μg/kg) were used as positive controls and 6 replicates of each control sample were tested to evaluate the accuracy and precision of these kits. In addition, we also evaluated the performance of these ELISA kits for AFB(1) in 30 feed samples, including corn, distillers dried grains with soluble, wheat samples, soybean meal, and poultry feed, which were verified by high performance liquid chromatography. Results showed that the coefficients of variation ranged from 1.18% to 16.22% in intra-plate and 2.85% to 18.04% in inter-plate for the determination of AFB(1). The half maximal inhibitory concentration for five kits ranged from 3.72 to 7.22 μg/kg. The quantitation limits of AFB(1) were all under the legal limit in China but somewhat inconsistent with kit instructions. Although the recovery rate of four of the five kits were either less than 90% or more than 110%, all these values were acceptable in practice. Two kits had high false positive rates (C and E). In conclusion, our results revealed that the qualities of five tested ELISA kits were significantly different.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4413000
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (AAAP) and Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology (KSAST)
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44130002015-05-01 Quality Evaluation of Five Commercial Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay Kits for Detecting Aflatoxin B(1) in Feedstuffs Sun, Dan-dan Gu, Xu Li, Jun-guo Yao, Ting Dong, Ying-chao Asian-Australas J Anim Sci Article The objective of this study was to evaluate the quality of five commercial enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits (A, B, C, D, and E) from different suppliers for detecting aflatoxin B(1) (AFB(1)). AFB(1)-free corn samples supplemented with different levels of AFB(1) (5, 10, and 20 μg/kg) were used as positive controls and 6 replicates of each control sample were tested to evaluate the accuracy and precision of these kits. In addition, we also evaluated the performance of these ELISA kits for AFB(1) in 30 feed samples, including corn, distillers dried grains with soluble, wheat samples, soybean meal, and poultry feed, which were verified by high performance liquid chromatography. Results showed that the coefficients of variation ranged from 1.18% to 16.22% in intra-plate and 2.85% to 18.04% in inter-plate for the determination of AFB(1). The half maximal inhibitory concentration for five kits ranged from 3.72 to 7.22 μg/kg. The quantitation limits of AFB(1) were all under the legal limit in China but somewhat inconsistent with kit instructions. Although the recovery rate of four of the five kits were either less than 90% or more than 110%, all these values were acceptable in practice. Two kits had high false positive rates (C and E). In conclusion, our results revealed that the qualities of five tested ELISA kits were significantly different. Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (AAAP) and Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology (KSAST) 2015-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4413000/ /pubmed/25924961 http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.14.0868 Text en Copyright © 2015 by Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), wwhich permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Sun, Dan-dan
Gu, Xu
Li, Jun-guo
Yao, Ting
Dong, Ying-chao
Quality Evaluation of Five Commercial Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay Kits for Detecting Aflatoxin B(1) in Feedstuffs
title Quality Evaluation of Five Commercial Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay Kits for Detecting Aflatoxin B(1) in Feedstuffs
title_full Quality Evaluation of Five Commercial Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay Kits for Detecting Aflatoxin B(1) in Feedstuffs
title_fullStr Quality Evaluation of Five Commercial Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay Kits for Detecting Aflatoxin B(1) in Feedstuffs
title_full_unstemmed Quality Evaluation of Five Commercial Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay Kits for Detecting Aflatoxin B(1) in Feedstuffs
title_short Quality Evaluation of Five Commercial Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay Kits for Detecting Aflatoxin B(1) in Feedstuffs
title_sort quality evaluation of five commercial enzyme linked immunosorbent assay kits for detecting aflatoxin b(1) in feedstuffs
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4413000/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25924961
http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.14.0868
work_keys_str_mv AT sundandan qualityevaluationoffivecommercialenzymelinkedimmunosorbentassaykitsfordetectingaflatoxinb1infeedstuffs
AT guxu qualityevaluationoffivecommercialenzymelinkedimmunosorbentassaykitsfordetectingaflatoxinb1infeedstuffs
AT lijunguo qualityevaluationoffivecommercialenzymelinkedimmunosorbentassaykitsfordetectingaflatoxinb1infeedstuffs
AT yaoting qualityevaluationoffivecommercialenzymelinkedimmunosorbentassaykitsfordetectingaflatoxinb1infeedstuffs
AT dongyingchao qualityevaluationoffivecommercialenzymelinkedimmunosorbentassaykitsfordetectingaflatoxinb1infeedstuffs