Cargando…

Evidence-based design in an intensive care unit: End-user perceptions

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to describe end-user impressions and experiences in a new intensive care unit built using evidence-based design. METHODS: This qualitative study was comprised of early (2–3 months after opening) and late (12–15 months after opening) phase individual interv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ferri, Mauricio, Zygun, David A, Harrison, Alexandra, Stelfox, Henry T
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4414278/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25907437
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-015-0038-4
_version_ 1782368904980463616
author Ferri, Mauricio
Zygun, David A
Harrison, Alexandra
Stelfox, Henry T
author_facet Ferri, Mauricio
Zygun, David A
Harrison, Alexandra
Stelfox, Henry T
author_sort Ferri, Mauricio
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to describe end-user impressions and experiences in a new intensive care unit built using evidence-based design. METHODS: This qualitative study was comprised of early (2–3 months after opening) and late (12–15 months after opening) phase individual interviews with end-users (healthcare providers, support staff, and patient family members) of the newly constructed Foothills Medical Centre intensive care unit in Calgary, Canada. The study unit was the recipient of the Society of Critical Care Medicine Design Citation award in 2012. RESULTS: We conducted interviews with thirty-nine ICU end-users, twenty-four in the early phase and fifteen in the late phase. We identified four themes (eleven sub-themes): atmosphere (abundant natural light and low noise levels), physical spaces (single occupancy rooms, rooms clustered into clinical pods, medication rooms, and tradeoffs of larger spaces), family participation in care (family support areas and social networks), and equipment (usability, storage, and providers connectivity). Abundant natural light was the design feature most frequently associated with a pleasant atmosphere. Participants emphasized the tradeoffs of size and space, and reported that the benefits of additional space (e.g., fewer interruptions due to less noise) out-weighed the disadvantages (e.g., greater distances between patients, families and providers). End-users advised that local patient care policies (e.g., number of visitors allowed at a time) and staffing needed to be updated to reflect the characteristics of the new facility design. CONCLUSIONS: End-users identified design elements for creating a pleasant atmosphere, attention to the tradeoffs of space and size, designing family support areas to encourage family participation in care, and updating patient care policies and staffing to reflect the new physical space as important aspects to consider when building intensive care units. Evidence-based design may optimize ICU structure for patients, patient families and providers. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12871-015-0038-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4414278
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44142782015-04-30 Evidence-based design in an intensive care unit: End-user perceptions Ferri, Mauricio Zygun, David A Harrison, Alexandra Stelfox, Henry T BMC Anesthesiol Research Article BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to describe end-user impressions and experiences in a new intensive care unit built using evidence-based design. METHODS: This qualitative study was comprised of early (2–3 months after opening) and late (12–15 months after opening) phase individual interviews with end-users (healthcare providers, support staff, and patient family members) of the newly constructed Foothills Medical Centre intensive care unit in Calgary, Canada. The study unit was the recipient of the Society of Critical Care Medicine Design Citation award in 2012. RESULTS: We conducted interviews with thirty-nine ICU end-users, twenty-four in the early phase and fifteen in the late phase. We identified four themes (eleven sub-themes): atmosphere (abundant natural light and low noise levels), physical spaces (single occupancy rooms, rooms clustered into clinical pods, medication rooms, and tradeoffs of larger spaces), family participation in care (family support areas and social networks), and equipment (usability, storage, and providers connectivity). Abundant natural light was the design feature most frequently associated with a pleasant atmosphere. Participants emphasized the tradeoffs of size and space, and reported that the benefits of additional space (e.g., fewer interruptions due to less noise) out-weighed the disadvantages (e.g., greater distances between patients, families and providers). End-users advised that local patient care policies (e.g., number of visitors allowed at a time) and staffing needed to be updated to reflect the characteristics of the new facility design. CONCLUSIONS: End-users identified design elements for creating a pleasant atmosphere, attention to the tradeoffs of space and size, designing family support areas to encourage family participation in care, and updating patient care policies and staffing to reflect the new physical space as important aspects to consider when building intensive care units. Evidence-based design may optimize ICU structure for patients, patient families and providers. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12871-015-0038-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4414278/ /pubmed/25907437 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-015-0038-4 Text en © Ferri et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ferri, Mauricio
Zygun, David A
Harrison, Alexandra
Stelfox, Henry T
Evidence-based design in an intensive care unit: End-user perceptions
title Evidence-based design in an intensive care unit: End-user perceptions
title_full Evidence-based design in an intensive care unit: End-user perceptions
title_fullStr Evidence-based design in an intensive care unit: End-user perceptions
title_full_unstemmed Evidence-based design in an intensive care unit: End-user perceptions
title_short Evidence-based design in an intensive care unit: End-user perceptions
title_sort evidence-based design in an intensive care unit: end-user perceptions
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4414278/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25907437
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-015-0038-4
work_keys_str_mv AT ferrimauricio evidencebaseddesigninanintensivecareunitenduserperceptions
AT zygundavida evidencebaseddesigninanintensivecareunitenduserperceptions
AT harrisonalexandra evidencebaseddesigninanintensivecareunitenduserperceptions
AT stelfoxhenryt evidencebaseddesigninanintensivecareunitenduserperceptions