Cargando…
Preconditioning Shields Against Vascular Events in Surgery (SAVES), a multicentre feasibility trial of preconditioning against adverse events in major vascular surgery: study protocol for a randomised control trial
BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing vascular surgery procedures constitute a ‘high-risk’ group. Fatal and disabling perioperative complications are common. Complications arise via multiple aetiological pathways. This mechanistic redundancy limits techniques to reduce complications that target individual...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4414457/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25903752 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0678-1 |
_version_ | 1782368935477248000 |
---|---|
author | Healy, Donagh Clarke-Moloney, Mary Gaughan, Brendan O’Daly, Siobhan Hausenloy, Derek Sharif, Faisal Newell, John O’Donnell, Martin Grace, Pierce Forbes, John F Cullen, Walter Kavanagh, Eamon Burke, Paul Cross, Simon Dowdall, Joseph McMonagle, Morgan Fulton, Greg Manning, Brian J Kheirelseid, Elrasheid AH Leahy, Austin Moneley, Daragh Naughton, Peter Boyle, Emily McHugh, Seamus Madhaven, Prakash O’Neill, Sean Martin, Zenia Courtney, Donal Tubassam, Muhammed Sultan, Sherif McCartan, Damian Medani, Mekki Walsh, Stewart |
author_facet | Healy, Donagh Clarke-Moloney, Mary Gaughan, Brendan O’Daly, Siobhan Hausenloy, Derek Sharif, Faisal Newell, John O’Donnell, Martin Grace, Pierce Forbes, John F Cullen, Walter Kavanagh, Eamon Burke, Paul Cross, Simon Dowdall, Joseph McMonagle, Morgan Fulton, Greg Manning, Brian J Kheirelseid, Elrasheid AH Leahy, Austin Moneley, Daragh Naughton, Peter Boyle, Emily McHugh, Seamus Madhaven, Prakash O’Neill, Sean Martin, Zenia Courtney, Donal Tubassam, Muhammed Sultan, Sherif McCartan, Damian Medani, Mekki Walsh, Stewart |
author_sort | Healy, Donagh |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing vascular surgery procedures constitute a ‘high-risk’ group. Fatal and disabling perioperative complications are common. Complications arise via multiple aetiological pathways. This mechanistic redundancy limits techniques to reduce complications that target individual mechanisms, for example, anti-platelet agents. Remote ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC) induces a protective phenotype in at-risk tissue, conferring protection against ischaemia-reperfusion injury regardless of the trigger. RIPC is induced by repeated periods of upper limb ischaemia-reperfusion produced using a blood pressure cuff. RIPC confers some protection against cardiac and renal injury during major vascular surgery in proof-of-concept trials. Similar trials suggest benefit during cardiac surgery. Several uncertainties remain in advance of a full-scale trial to evaluate clinical efficacy. We propose a feasibility trial to fully evaluate arm-induced RIPC’s ability to confer protection in major vascular surgery, assess the incidence of a proposed composite primary efficacy endpoint and evaluate the intervention’s acceptability to patients and staff. METHODS/DESIGN: Four hundred major vascular surgery patients in five Irish vascular centres will be randomised (stratified for centre and procedure) to undergo RIPC or not immediately before surgery. RIPC will be induced using a blood pressure cuff with four cycles of 5 minutes of ischaemia followed by 5 minutes of reperfusion immediately before the start of operations. There is no sham intervention. Participants will undergo serum troponin measurements pre-operatively and 1, 2, and 3 days post-operatively. Participants will undergo 12-lead electrocardiograms pre-operatively and on the second post-operative day. Predefined complications within one year of surgery will be recorded. Patient and staff experiences will be explored using qualitative techniques. The primary outcome measure is the proportion of patients who develop elevated serum troponin levels in the first 3 days post-operatively. Secondary outcome measures include length of hospital and critical care stay, unplanned critical care admissions, death, myocardial infarction, stroke, mesenteric ischaemia and need for renal replacement therapy (within 30 days of surgery). DISCUSSION: RIPC is novel intervention with the potential to significantly improve perioperative outcomes. This trial will provide the first evaluation of RIPC’s ability to reduce adverse clinical events following major vascular surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT02097186 Date Registered: 24 March 2014 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4414457 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44144572015-04-30 Preconditioning Shields Against Vascular Events in Surgery (SAVES), a multicentre feasibility trial of preconditioning against adverse events in major vascular surgery: study protocol for a randomised control trial Healy, Donagh Clarke-Moloney, Mary Gaughan, Brendan O’Daly, Siobhan Hausenloy, Derek Sharif, Faisal Newell, John O’Donnell, Martin Grace, Pierce Forbes, John F Cullen, Walter Kavanagh, Eamon Burke, Paul Cross, Simon Dowdall, Joseph McMonagle, Morgan Fulton, Greg Manning, Brian J Kheirelseid, Elrasheid AH Leahy, Austin Moneley, Daragh Naughton, Peter Boyle, Emily McHugh, Seamus Madhaven, Prakash O’Neill, Sean Martin, Zenia Courtney, Donal Tubassam, Muhammed Sultan, Sherif McCartan, Damian Medani, Mekki Walsh, Stewart Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing vascular surgery procedures constitute a ‘high-risk’ group. Fatal and disabling perioperative complications are common. Complications arise via multiple aetiological pathways. This mechanistic redundancy limits techniques to reduce complications that target individual mechanisms, for example, anti-platelet agents. Remote ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC) induces a protective phenotype in at-risk tissue, conferring protection against ischaemia-reperfusion injury regardless of the trigger. RIPC is induced by repeated periods of upper limb ischaemia-reperfusion produced using a blood pressure cuff. RIPC confers some protection against cardiac and renal injury during major vascular surgery in proof-of-concept trials. Similar trials suggest benefit during cardiac surgery. Several uncertainties remain in advance of a full-scale trial to evaluate clinical efficacy. We propose a feasibility trial to fully evaluate arm-induced RIPC’s ability to confer protection in major vascular surgery, assess the incidence of a proposed composite primary efficacy endpoint and evaluate the intervention’s acceptability to patients and staff. METHODS/DESIGN: Four hundred major vascular surgery patients in five Irish vascular centres will be randomised (stratified for centre and procedure) to undergo RIPC or not immediately before surgery. RIPC will be induced using a blood pressure cuff with four cycles of 5 minutes of ischaemia followed by 5 minutes of reperfusion immediately before the start of operations. There is no sham intervention. Participants will undergo serum troponin measurements pre-operatively and 1, 2, and 3 days post-operatively. Participants will undergo 12-lead electrocardiograms pre-operatively and on the second post-operative day. Predefined complications within one year of surgery will be recorded. Patient and staff experiences will be explored using qualitative techniques. The primary outcome measure is the proportion of patients who develop elevated serum troponin levels in the first 3 days post-operatively. Secondary outcome measures include length of hospital and critical care stay, unplanned critical care admissions, death, myocardial infarction, stroke, mesenteric ischaemia and need for renal replacement therapy (within 30 days of surgery). DISCUSSION: RIPC is novel intervention with the potential to significantly improve perioperative outcomes. This trial will provide the first evaluation of RIPC’s ability to reduce adverse clinical events following major vascular surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT02097186 Date Registered: 24 March 2014 BioMed Central 2015-04-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4414457/ /pubmed/25903752 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0678-1 Text en © Healy et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Healy, Donagh Clarke-Moloney, Mary Gaughan, Brendan O’Daly, Siobhan Hausenloy, Derek Sharif, Faisal Newell, John O’Donnell, Martin Grace, Pierce Forbes, John F Cullen, Walter Kavanagh, Eamon Burke, Paul Cross, Simon Dowdall, Joseph McMonagle, Morgan Fulton, Greg Manning, Brian J Kheirelseid, Elrasheid AH Leahy, Austin Moneley, Daragh Naughton, Peter Boyle, Emily McHugh, Seamus Madhaven, Prakash O’Neill, Sean Martin, Zenia Courtney, Donal Tubassam, Muhammed Sultan, Sherif McCartan, Damian Medani, Mekki Walsh, Stewart Preconditioning Shields Against Vascular Events in Surgery (SAVES), a multicentre feasibility trial of preconditioning against adverse events in major vascular surgery: study protocol for a randomised control trial |
title | Preconditioning Shields Against Vascular Events in Surgery (SAVES), a multicentre feasibility trial of preconditioning against adverse events in major vascular surgery: study protocol for a randomised control trial |
title_full | Preconditioning Shields Against Vascular Events in Surgery (SAVES), a multicentre feasibility trial of preconditioning against adverse events in major vascular surgery: study protocol for a randomised control trial |
title_fullStr | Preconditioning Shields Against Vascular Events in Surgery (SAVES), a multicentre feasibility trial of preconditioning against adverse events in major vascular surgery: study protocol for a randomised control trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Preconditioning Shields Against Vascular Events in Surgery (SAVES), a multicentre feasibility trial of preconditioning against adverse events in major vascular surgery: study protocol for a randomised control trial |
title_short | Preconditioning Shields Against Vascular Events in Surgery (SAVES), a multicentre feasibility trial of preconditioning against adverse events in major vascular surgery: study protocol for a randomised control trial |
title_sort | preconditioning shields against vascular events in surgery (saves), a multicentre feasibility trial of preconditioning against adverse events in major vascular surgery: study protocol for a randomised control trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4414457/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25903752 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0678-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT healydonagh preconditioningshieldsagainstvasculareventsinsurgerysavesamulticentrefeasibilitytrialofpreconditioningagainstadverseeventsinmajorvascularsurgerystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontroltrial AT clarkemoloneymary preconditioningshieldsagainstvasculareventsinsurgerysavesamulticentrefeasibilitytrialofpreconditioningagainstadverseeventsinmajorvascularsurgerystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontroltrial AT gaughanbrendan preconditioningshieldsagainstvasculareventsinsurgerysavesamulticentrefeasibilitytrialofpreconditioningagainstadverseeventsinmajorvascularsurgerystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontroltrial AT odalysiobhan preconditioningshieldsagainstvasculareventsinsurgerysavesamulticentrefeasibilitytrialofpreconditioningagainstadverseeventsinmajorvascularsurgerystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontroltrial AT hausenloyderek preconditioningshieldsagainstvasculareventsinsurgerysavesamulticentrefeasibilitytrialofpreconditioningagainstadverseeventsinmajorvascularsurgerystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontroltrial AT shariffaisal preconditioningshieldsagainstvasculareventsinsurgerysavesamulticentrefeasibilitytrialofpreconditioningagainstadverseeventsinmajorvascularsurgerystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontroltrial AT newelljohn preconditioningshieldsagainstvasculareventsinsurgerysavesamulticentrefeasibilitytrialofpreconditioningagainstadverseeventsinmajorvascularsurgerystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontroltrial AT odonnellmartin preconditioningshieldsagainstvasculareventsinsurgerysavesamulticentrefeasibilitytrialofpreconditioningagainstadverseeventsinmajorvascularsurgerystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontroltrial AT gracepierce preconditioningshieldsagainstvasculareventsinsurgerysavesamulticentrefeasibilitytrialofpreconditioningagainstadverseeventsinmajorvascularsurgerystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontroltrial AT forbesjohnf preconditioningshieldsagainstvasculareventsinsurgerysavesamulticentrefeasibilitytrialofpreconditioningagainstadverseeventsinmajorvascularsurgerystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontroltrial AT cullenwalter preconditioningshieldsagainstvasculareventsinsurgerysavesamulticentrefeasibilitytrialofpreconditioningagainstadverseeventsinmajorvascularsurgerystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontroltrial AT kavanagheamon preconditioningshieldsagainstvasculareventsinsurgerysavesamulticentrefeasibilitytrialofpreconditioningagainstadverseeventsinmajorvascularsurgerystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontroltrial AT burkepaul preconditioningshieldsagainstvasculareventsinsurgerysavesamulticentrefeasibilitytrialofpreconditioningagainstadverseeventsinmajorvascularsurgerystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontroltrial AT crosssimon preconditioningshieldsagainstvasculareventsinsurgerysavesamulticentrefeasibilitytrialofpreconditioningagainstadverseeventsinmajorvascularsurgerystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontroltrial AT dowdalljoseph preconditioningshieldsagainstvasculareventsinsurgerysavesamulticentrefeasibilitytrialofpreconditioningagainstadverseeventsinmajorvascularsurgerystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontroltrial AT mcmonaglemorgan preconditioningshieldsagainstvasculareventsinsurgerysavesamulticentrefeasibilitytrialofpreconditioningagainstadverseeventsinmajorvascularsurgerystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontroltrial AT fultongreg preconditioningshieldsagainstvasculareventsinsurgerysavesamulticentrefeasibilitytrialofpreconditioningagainstadverseeventsinmajorvascularsurgerystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontroltrial AT manningbrianj preconditioningshieldsagainstvasculareventsinsurgerysavesamulticentrefeasibilitytrialofpreconditioningagainstadverseeventsinmajorvascularsurgerystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontroltrial AT kheirelseidelrasheidah preconditioningshieldsagainstvasculareventsinsurgerysavesamulticentrefeasibilitytrialofpreconditioningagainstadverseeventsinmajorvascularsurgerystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontroltrial AT leahyaustin preconditioningshieldsagainstvasculareventsinsurgerysavesamulticentrefeasibilitytrialofpreconditioningagainstadverseeventsinmajorvascularsurgerystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontroltrial AT moneleydaragh preconditioningshieldsagainstvasculareventsinsurgerysavesamulticentrefeasibilitytrialofpreconditioningagainstadverseeventsinmajorvascularsurgerystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontroltrial AT naughtonpeter preconditioningshieldsagainstvasculareventsinsurgerysavesamulticentrefeasibilitytrialofpreconditioningagainstadverseeventsinmajorvascularsurgerystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontroltrial AT boyleemily preconditioningshieldsagainstvasculareventsinsurgerysavesamulticentrefeasibilitytrialofpreconditioningagainstadverseeventsinmajorvascularsurgerystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontroltrial AT mchughseamus preconditioningshieldsagainstvasculareventsinsurgerysavesamulticentrefeasibilitytrialofpreconditioningagainstadverseeventsinmajorvascularsurgerystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontroltrial AT madhavenprakash preconditioningshieldsagainstvasculareventsinsurgerysavesamulticentrefeasibilitytrialofpreconditioningagainstadverseeventsinmajorvascularsurgerystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontroltrial AT oneillsean preconditioningshieldsagainstvasculareventsinsurgerysavesamulticentrefeasibilitytrialofpreconditioningagainstadverseeventsinmajorvascularsurgerystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontroltrial AT martinzenia preconditioningshieldsagainstvasculareventsinsurgerysavesamulticentrefeasibilitytrialofpreconditioningagainstadverseeventsinmajorvascularsurgerystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontroltrial AT courtneydonal preconditioningshieldsagainstvasculareventsinsurgerysavesamulticentrefeasibilitytrialofpreconditioningagainstadverseeventsinmajorvascularsurgerystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontroltrial AT tubassammuhammed preconditioningshieldsagainstvasculareventsinsurgerysavesamulticentrefeasibilitytrialofpreconditioningagainstadverseeventsinmajorvascularsurgerystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontroltrial AT sultansherif preconditioningshieldsagainstvasculareventsinsurgerysavesamulticentrefeasibilitytrialofpreconditioningagainstadverseeventsinmajorvascularsurgerystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontroltrial AT mccartandamian preconditioningshieldsagainstvasculareventsinsurgerysavesamulticentrefeasibilitytrialofpreconditioningagainstadverseeventsinmajorvascularsurgerystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontroltrial AT medanimekki preconditioningshieldsagainstvasculareventsinsurgerysavesamulticentrefeasibilitytrialofpreconditioningagainstadverseeventsinmajorvascularsurgerystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontroltrial AT walshstewart preconditioningshieldsagainstvasculareventsinsurgerysavesamulticentrefeasibilitytrialofpreconditioningagainstadverseeventsinmajorvascularsurgerystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontroltrial |