Cargando…
Worldwide productivity in the field of foot and ankle research from 2009–2013: a bibliometric analysis of highly cited journals
BACKGROUND: Significant growth has been observed in the field of foot and ankle research in recent years. However, bibliometric studies concerning the quantity and quality of articles published in foot and ankle journals are scarce. This study aimed to reveal the characteristics of national producti...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4414464/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25926891 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-015-0070-0 |
_version_ | 1782368937043820544 |
---|---|
author | Luo, Xuyao Liang, Zhimin Gong, Feng Bao, Hongwei Huang, Li Jia, Zhiwei |
author_facet | Luo, Xuyao Liang, Zhimin Gong, Feng Bao, Hongwei Huang, Li Jia, Zhiwei |
author_sort | Luo, Xuyao |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Significant growth has been observed in the field of foot and ankle research in recent years. However, bibliometric studies concerning the quantity and quality of articles published in foot and ankle journals are scarce. This study aimed to reveal the characteristics of national productivity in the field of foot and ankle research and to provide a general picture of foot and ankle research for surgeons and researchers. METHODS: Web of Science was searched for foot and ankle articles in 4 highly cited journals from 2009 to 2013. The number of total articles and citations were collected to evaluate the contribution of different countries. Publication activity was adjusted for the countries by population size and gross domestic product (GDP). RESULTS: A total number of 2083 articles were published worldwide. North America, West Europe, Australia and East Asia were the most productive world regions. High income countries published 90.35% of articles, middle-income 9.60%, and low-income just 0.05%. The United States published the largest number of articles (1025/2083, 49.2%), followed by the United Kingdom (221/2083, 10.6%), Australia (92/2083, 4.4%), and had the highest total citations (3631). However, Canada had the highest average citations per article (5.0), followed by Australia (4.6) and Switzerland (4.2). There were positive correlations between the total number of publications and population/GDP (p < 0.01). When normalized to population size, Switzerland ranked the highest, followed by Australia, and the United Kingdom. When adjusted for GDP, Switzerland ranked the highest, followed by United Kingdom, and South Korea. CONCLUSIONS: The United States is the most productive country in the field of foot and ankle research. However, Australia, some smaller European and Asian countries may be more productive relative to their size. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4414464 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44144642015-04-30 Worldwide productivity in the field of foot and ankle research from 2009–2013: a bibliometric analysis of highly cited journals Luo, Xuyao Liang, Zhimin Gong, Feng Bao, Hongwei Huang, Li Jia, Zhiwei J Foot Ankle Res Research BACKGROUND: Significant growth has been observed in the field of foot and ankle research in recent years. However, bibliometric studies concerning the quantity and quality of articles published in foot and ankle journals are scarce. This study aimed to reveal the characteristics of national productivity in the field of foot and ankle research and to provide a general picture of foot and ankle research for surgeons and researchers. METHODS: Web of Science was searched for foot and ankle articles in 4 highly cited journals from 2009 to 2013. The number of total articles and citations were collected to evaluate the contribution of different countries. Publication activity was adjusted for the countries by population size and gross domestic product (GDP). RESULTS: A total number of 2083 articles were published worldwide. North America, West Europe, Australia and East Asia were the most productive world regions. High income countries published 90.35% of articles, middle-income 9.60%, and low-income just 0.05%. The United States published the largest number of articles (1025/2083, 49.2%), followed by the United Kingdom (221/2083, 10.6%), Australia (92/2083, 4.4%), and had the highest total citations (3631). However, Canada had the highest average citations per article (5.0), followed by Australia (4.6) and Switzerland (4.2). There were positive correlations between the total number of publications and population/GDP (p < 0.01). When normalized to population size, Switzerland ranked the highest, followed by Australia, and the United Kingdom. When adjusted for GDP, Switzerland ranked the highest, followed by United Kingdom, and South Korea. CONCLUSIONS: The United States is the most productive country in the field of foot and ankle research. However, Australia, some smaller European and Asian countries may be more productive relative to their size. BioMed Central 2015-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4414464/ /pubmed/25926891 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-015-0070-0 Text en © Luo et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Luo, Xuyao Liang, Zhimin Gong, Feng Bao, Hongwei Huang, Li Jia, Zhiwei Worldwide productivity in the field of foot and ankle research from 2009–2013: a bibliometric analysis of highly cited journals |
title | Worldwide productivity in the field of foot and ankle research from 2009–2013: a bibliometric analysis of highly cited journals |
title_full | Worldwide productivity in the field of foot and ankle research from 2009–2013: a bibliometric analysis of highly cited journals |
title_fullStr | Worldwide productivity in the field of foot and ankle research from 2009–2013: a bibliometric analysis of highly cited journals |
title_full_unstemmed | Worldwide productivity in the field of foot and ankle research from 2009–2013: a bibliometric analysis of highly cited journals |
title_short | Worldwide productivity in the field of foot and ankle research from 2009–2013: a bibliometric analysis of highly cited journals |
title_sort | worldwide productivity in the field of foot and ankle research from 2009–2013: a bibliometric analysis of highly cited journals |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4414464/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25926891 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-015-0070-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT luoxuyao worldwideproductivityinthefieldoffootandankleresearchfrom20092013abibliometricanalysisofhighlycitedjournals AT liangzhimin worldwideproductivityinthefieldoffootandankleresearchfrom20092013abibliometricanalysisofhighlycitedjournals AT gongfeng worldwideproductivityinthefieldoffootandankleresearchfrom20092013abibliometricanalysisofhighlycitedjournals AT baohongwei worldwideproductivityinthefieldoffootandankleresearchfrom20092013abibliometricanalysisofhighlycitedjournals AT huangli worldwideproductivityinthefieldoffootandankleresearchfrom20092013abibliometricanalysisofhighlycitedjournals AT jiazhiwei worldwideproductivityinthefieldoffootandankleresearchfrom20092013abibliometricanalysisofhighlycitedjournals |