Cargando…

A Comparison of Some Organizational Characteristics of the Mouse Central Retina and the Human Macula

Mouse models have greatly assisted our understanding of retinal degenerations. However, the mouse retina does not have a macula, leading to the question of whether the mouse is a relevant model for macular degeneration. In the present study, a quantitative comparison between the organization of the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Volland, Stefanie, Esteve-Rudd, Julian, Hoo, Juyea, Yee, Claudine, Williams, David S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4414478/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25923208
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125631
_version_ 1782368940031213568
author Volland, Stefanie
Esteve-Rudd, Julian
Hoo, Juyea
Yee, Claudine
Williams, David S.
author_facet Volland, Stefanie
Esteve-Rudd, Julian
Hoo, Juyea
Yee, Claudine
Williams, David S.
author_sort Volland, Stefanie
collection PubMed
description Mouse models have greatly assisted our understanding of retinal degenerations. However, the mouse retina does not have a macula, leading to the question of whether the mouse is a relevant model for macular degeneration. In the present study, a quantitative comparison between the organization of the central mouse retina and the human macula was made, focusing on some structural characteristics that have been suggested to be important in predisposing the macula to stresses leading to degeneration: photoreceptor density, phagocytic load on the RPE, and the relative thinness of Bruch’s membrane. Light and electron microscopy measurements from retinas of two strains of mice, together with published data on human retinas, were used for calculations and subsequent comparisons. As in the human retina, the central region of the mouse retina possesses a higher photoreceptor cell density and a thinner Bruch’s membrane than in the periphery; however, the magnitudes of these periphery to center gradients are larger in the human. Of potentially greater relevance is the actual photoreceptor cell density, which is much greater in the mouse central retina than in the human macula, underlying a higher phagocytic load for the mouse RPE. Moreover, at eccentricities that correspond to the peripheral half of the human macula, the rod to cone ratio is similar between mouse and human. Hence, with respect to photoreceptor density and phagocytic load of the RPE, the central mouse retina models at least the more peripheral part of the macula, where macular degeneration is often first evident.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4414478
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44144782015-05-07 A Comparison of Some Organizational Characteristics of the Mouse Central Retina and the Human Macula Volland, Stefanie Esteve-Rudd, Julian Hoo, Juyea Yee, Claudine Williams, David S. PLoS One Research Article Mouse models have greatly assisted our understanding of retinal degenerations. However, the mouse retina does not have a macula, leading to the question of whether the mouse is a relevant model for macular degeneration. In the present study, a quantitative comparison between the organization of the central mouse retina and the human macula was made, focusing on some structural characteristics that have been suggested to be important in predisposing the macula to stresses leading to degeneration: photoreceptor density, phagocytic load on the RPE, and the relative thinness of Bruch’s membrane. Light and electron microscopy measurements from retinas of two strains of mice, together with published data on human retinas, were used for calculations and subsequent comparisons. As in the human retina, the central region of the mouse retina possesses a higher photoreceptor cell density and a thinner Bruch’s membrane than in the periphery; however, the magnitudes of these periphery to center gradients are larger in the human. Of potentially greater relevance is the actual photoreceptor cell density, which is much greater in the mouse central retina than in the human macula, underlying a higher phagocytic load for the mouse RPE. Moreover, at eccentricities that correspond to the peripheral half of the human macula, the rod to cone ratio is similar between mouse and human. Hence, with respect to photoreceptor density and phagocytic load of the RPE, the central mouse retina models at least the more peripheral part of the macula, where macular degeneration is often first evident. Public Library of Science 2015-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4414478/ /pubmed/25923208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125631 Text en © 2015 Volland et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Volland, Stefanie
Esteve-Rudd, Julian
Hoo, Juyea
Yee, Claudine
Williams, David S.
A Comparison of Some Organizational Characteristics of the Mouse Central Retina and the Human Macula
title A Comparison of Some Organizational Characteristics of the Mouse Central Retina and the Human Macula
title_full A Comparison of Some Organizational Characteristics of the Mouse Central Retina and the Human Macula
title_fullStr A Comparison of Some Organizational Characteristics of the Mouse Central Retina and the Human Macula
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Some Organizational Characteristics of the Mouse Central Retina and the Human Macula
title_short A Comparison of Some Organizational Characteristics of the Mouse Central Retina and the Human Macula
title_sort comparison of some organizational characteristics of the mouse central retina and the human macula
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4414478/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25923208
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125631
work_keys_str_mv AT vollandstefanie acomparisonofsomeorganizationalcharacteristicsofthemousecentralretinaandthehumanmacula
AT esteveruddjulian acomparisonofsomeorganizationalcharacteristicsofthemousecentralretinaandthehumanmacula
AT hoojuyea acomparisonofsomeorganizationalcharacteristicsofthemousecentralretinaandthehumanmacula
AT yeeclaudine acomparisonofsomeorganizationalcharacteristicsofthemousecentralretinaandthehumanmacula
AT williamsdavids acomparisonofsomeorganizationalcharacteristicsofthemousecentralretinaandthehumanmacula
AT vollandstefanie comparisonofsomeorganizationalcharacteristicsofthemousecentralretinaandthehumanmacula
AT esteveruddjulian comparisonofsomeorganizationalcharacteristicsofthemousecentralretinaandthehumanmacula
AT hoojuyea comparisonofsomeorganizationalcharacteristicsofthemousecentralretinaandthehumanmacula
AT yeeclaudine comparisonofsomeorganizationalcharacteristicsofthemousecentralretinaandthehumanmacula
AT williamsdavids comparisonofsomeorganizationalcharacteristicsofthemousecentralretinaandthehumanmacula