Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness of Out-of-Hospital Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Acute Respiratory Failure

STUDY OBJECTIVE: We determine the cost-effectiveness of out-of-hospital continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) compared with standard care for adults presenting to emergency medical services with acute respiratory failure. METHODS: We developed an economic model using a United Kingdom health car...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thokala, Praveen, Goodacre, Steve, Ward, Matt, Penn-Ashman, Jerry, Perkins, Gavin D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mosby 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4414542/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25737210
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.12.028
_version_ 1782368952449499136
author Thokala, Praveen
Goodacre, Steve
Ward, Matt
Penn-Ashman, Jerry
Perkins, Gavin D.
author_facet Thokala, Praveen
Goodacre, Steve
Ward, Matt
Penn-Ashman, Jerry
Perkins, Gavin D.
author_sort Thokala, Praveen
collection PubMed
description STUDY OBJECTIVE: We determine the cost-effectiveness of out-of-hospital continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) compared with standard care for adults presenting to emergency medical services with acute respiratory failure. METHODS: We developed an economic model using a United Kingdom health care system perspective to compare the costs and health outcomes of out-of-hospital CPAP to standard care (inhospital noninvasive ventilation) when applied to a hypothetical cohort of patients with acute respiratory failure. The model assigned each patient a probability of intubation or death, depending on the patient’s characteristics and whether he or she had out-of-hospital CPAP or standard care. The patients who survived accrued lifetime quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and health care costs according to their age and sex. Costs were accrued through intervention and hospital treatment costs, which depended on patient outcomes. All results were converted into US dollars, using the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development purchasing power parities rates. RESULTS: Out-of-hospital CPAP was more effective than standard care but was also more expensive, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £20,514 per QALY ($29,720/QALY) and a 49.5% probability of being cost-effective at the £20,000 per QALY ($29,000/QALY) threshold. The probability of out-of-hospital CPAP’s being cost-effective at the £20,000 per QALY ($29,000/QALY) threshold depended on the incidence of eligible patients and varied from 35.4% when a low estimate of incidence was used to 93.8% with a high estimate. Variation in the incidence of eligible patients also had a marked influence on the expected value of sample information for a future randomized trial. CONCLUSION: The cost-effectiveness of out-of-hospital CPAP is uncertain. The incidence of patients eligible for out-of-hospital CPAP appears to be the key determinant of cost-effectiveness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4414542
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Mosby
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44145422015-05-04 Cost-effectiveness of Out-of-Hospital Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Acute Respiratory Failure Thokala, Praveen Goodacre, Steve Ward, Matt Penn-Ashman, Jerry Perkins, Gavin D. Ann Emerg Med Emergency Medical Services/Original Research STUDY OBJECTIVE: We determine the cost-effectiveness of out-of-hospital continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) compared with standard care for adults presenting to emergency medical services with acute respiratory failure. METHODS: We developed an economic model using a United Kingdom health care system perspective to compare the costs and health outcomes of out-of-hospital CPAP to standard care (inhospital noninvasive ventilation) when applied to a hypothetical cohort of patients with acute respiratory failure. The model assigned each patient a probability of intubation or death, depending on the patient’s characteristics and whether he or she had out-of-hospital CPAP or standard care. The patients who survived accrued lifetime quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and health care costs according to their age and sex. Costs were accrued through intervention and hospital treatment costs, which depended on patient outcomes. All results were converted into US dollars, using the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development purchasing power parities rates. RESULTS: Out-of-hospital CPAP was more effective than standard care but was also more expensive, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £20,514 per QALY ($29,720/QALY) and a 49.5% probability of being cost-effective at the £20,000 per QALY ($29,000/QALY) threshold. The probability of out-of-hospital CPAP’s being cost-effective at the £20,000 per QALY ($29,000/QALY) threshold depended on the incidence of eligible patients and varied from 35.4% when a low estimate of incidence was used to 93.8% with a high estimate. Variation in the incidence of eligible patients also had a marked influence on the expected value of sample information for a future randomized trial. CONCLUSION: The cost-effectiveness of out-of-hospital CPAP is uncertain. The incidence of patients eligible for out-of-hospital CPAP appears to be the key determinant of cost-effectiveness. Mosby 2015-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4414542/ /pubmed/25737210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.12.028 Text en © 2015 by the American College of Emergency Physicians. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which allows reusers to copy and distribute the material in any medium or format in unadapted form only, for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.
spellingShingle Emergency Medical Services/Original Research
Thokala, Praveen
Goodacre, Steve
Ward, Matt
Penn-Ashman, Jerry
Perkins, Gavin D.
Cost-effectiveness of Out-of-Hospital Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Acute Respiratory Failure
title Cost-effectiveness of Out-of-Hospital Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Acute Respiratory Failure
title_full Cost-effectiveness of Out-of-Hospital Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Acute Respiratory Failure
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness of Out-of-Hospital Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Acute Respiratory Failure
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness of Out-of-Hospital Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Acute Respiratory Failure
title_short Cost-effectiveness of Out-of-Hospital Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Acute Respiratory Failure
title_sort cost-effectiveness of out-of-hospital continuous positive airway pressure for acute respiratory failure
topic Emergency Medical Services/Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4414542/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25737210
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.12.028
work_keys_str_mv AT thokalapraveen costeffectivenessofoutofhospitalcontinuouspositiveairwaypressureforacuterespiratoryfailure
AT goodacresteve costeffectivenessofoutofhospitalcontinuouspositiveairwaypressureforacuterespiratoryfailure
AT wardmatt costeffectivenessofoutofhospitalcontinuouspositiveairwaypressureforacuterespiratoryfailure
AT pennashmanjerry costeffectivenessofoutofhospitalcontinuouspositiveairwaypressureforacuterespiratoryfailure
AT perkinsgavind costeffectivenessofoutofhospitalcontinuouspositiveairwaypressureforacuterespiratoryfailure