Cargando…

Evaluating Historical Candidate Genes for Schizophrenia

Prior to the genome-wide association era, candidate gene studies were a major approach in schizophrenia genetics. In this invited review, we consider the current status of 25 historical candidate genes for schizophrenia (e.g., COMT, DISC1, DTNBP1, and NRG1). The initial study for 24 of these genes e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Farrell, Martilias, Werge, Thomas, Sklar, Pamela, Owen, Michael J., Ophoff, Roel, O’Donovan, Michael, Corvin, Aiden, Cichon, Sven, Sullivan, Patrick F
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4414705/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25754081
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/mp.2015.16
_version_ 1782368980162314240
author Farrell, Martilias
Werge, Thomas
Sklar, Pamela
Owen, Michael J.
Ophoff, Roel
O’Donovan, Michael
Corvin, Aiden
Cichon, Sven
Sullivan, Patrick F
author_facet Farrell, Martilias
Werge, Thomas
Sklar, Pamela
Owen, Michael J.
Ophoff, Roel
O’Donovan, Michael
Corvin, Aiden
Cichon, Sven
Sullivan, Patrick F
author_sort Farrell, Martilias
collection PubMed
description Prior to the genome-wide association era, candidate gene studies were a major approach in schizophrenia genetics. In this invited review, we consider the current status of 25 historical candidate genes for schizophrenia (e.g., COMT, DISC1, DTNBP1, and NRG1). The initial study for 24 of these genes explicitly evaluated common variant hypotheses about schizophrenia. Our evaluation included a meta-analysis of the candidate gene literature, incorporation of the results of the largest genomic study yet published for schizophrenia, ratings from informed researchers who have published on these genes, and ratings from 24 schizophrenia geneticists. On the basis of current empirical evidence and mostly consensual assessments of informed opinion, it appears that the historical candidate gene literature did not yield clear insights into the genetic basis of schizophrenia. A likely reason why historical candidate gene studies did not achieve their primary aims is inadequate statistical power. However, the considerable efforts embodied in these early studies unquestionably set the stage for current successes in genomic approaches to schizophrenia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4414705
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44147052015-11-01 Evaluating Historical Candidate Genes for Schizophrenia Farrell, Martilias Werge, Thomas Sklar, Pamela Owen, Michael J. Ophoff, Roel O’Donovan, Michael Corvin, Aiden Cichon, Sven Sullivan, Patrick F Mol Psychiatry Article Prior to the genome-wide association era, candidate gene studies were a major approach in schizophrenia genetics. In this invited review, we consider the current status of 25 historical candidate genes for schizophrenia (e.g., COMT, DISC1, DTNBP1, and NRG1). The initial study for 24 of these genes explicitly evaluated common variant hypotheses about schizophrenia. Our evaluation included a meta-analysis of the candidate gene literature, incorporation of the results of the largest genomic study yet published for schizophrenia, ratings from informed researchers who have published on these genes, and ratings from 24 schizophrenia geneticists. On the basis of current empirical evidence and mostly consensual assessments of informed opinion, it appears that the historical candidate gene literature did not yield clear insights into the genetic basis of schizophrenia. A likely reason why historical candidate gene studies did not achieve their primary aims is inadequate statistical power. However, the considerable efforts embodied in these early studies unquestionably set the stage for current successes in genomic approaches to schizophrenia. 2015-03-10 2015-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4414705/ /pubmed/25754081 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/mp.2015.16 Text en http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use:http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms
spellingShingle Article
Farrell, Martilias
Werge, Thomas
Sklar, Pamela
Owen, Michael J.
Ophoff, Roel
O’Donovan, Michael
Corvin, Aiden
Cichon, Sven
Sullivan, Patrick F
Evaluating Historical Candidate Genes for Schizophrenia
title Evaluating Historical Candidate Genes for Schizophrenia
title_full Evaluating Historical Candidate Genes for Schizophrenia
title_fullStr Evaluating Historical Candidate Genes for Schizophrenia
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating Historical Candidate Genes for Schizophrenia
title_short Evaluating Historical Candidate Genes for Schizophrenia
title_sort evaluating historical candidate genes for schizophrenia
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4414705/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25754081
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/mp.2015.16
work_keys_str_mv AT farrellmartilias evaluatinghistoricalcandidategenesforschizophrenia
AT wergethomas evaluatinghistoricalcandidategenesforschizophrenia
AT sklarpamela evaluatinghistoricalcandidategenesforschizophrenia
AT owenmichaelj evaluatinghistoricalcandidategenesforschizophrenia
AT ophoffroel evaluatinghistoricalcandidategenesforschizophrenia
AT odonovanmichael evaluatinghistoricalcandidategenesforschizophrenia
AT corvinaiden evaluatinghistoricalcandidategenesforschizophrenia
AT cichonsven evaluatinghistoricalcandidategenesforschizophrenia
AT sullivanpatrickf evaluatinghistoricalcandidategenesforschizophrenia