Cargando…
Evaluating Historical Candidate Genes for Schizophrenia
Prior to the genome-wide association era, candidate gene studies were a major approach in schizophrenia genetics. In this invited review, we consider the current status of 25 historical candidate genes for schizophrenia (e.g., COMT, DISC1, DTNBP1, and NRG1). The initial study for 24 of these genes e...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4414705/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25754081 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/mp.2015.16 |
_version_ | 1782368980162314240 |
---|---|
author | Farrell, Martilias Werge, Thomas Sklar, Pamela Owen, Michael J. Ophoff, Roel O’Donovan, Michael Corvin, Aiden Cichon, Sven Sullivan, Patrick F |
author_facet | Farrell, Martilias Werge, Thomas Sklar, Pamela Owen, Michael J. Ophoff, Roel O’Donovan, Michael Corvin, Aiden Cichon, Sven Sullivan, Patrick F |
author_sort | Farrell, Martilias |
collection | PubMed |
description | Prior to the genome-wide association era, candidate gene studies were a major approach in schizophrenia genetics. In this invited review, we consider the current status of 25 historical candidate genes for schizophrenia (e.g., COMT, DISC1, DTNBP1, and NRG1). The initial study for 24 of these genes explicitly evaluated common variant hypotheses about schizophrenia. Our evaluation included a meta-analysis of the candidate gene literature, incorporation of the results of the largest genomic study yet published for schizophrenia, ratings from informed researchers who have published on these genes, and ratings from 24 schizophrenia geneticists. On the basis of current empirical evidence and mostly consensual assessments of informed opinion, it appears that the historical candidate gene literature did not yield clear insights into the genetic basis of schizophrenia. A likely reason why historical candidate gene studies did not achieve their primary aims is inadequate statistical power. However, the considerable efforts embodied in these early studies unquestionably set the stage for current successes in genomic approaches to schizophrenia. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4414705 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44147052015-11-01 Evaluating Historical Candidate Genes for Schizophrenia Farrell, Martilias Werge, Thomas Sklar, Pamela Owen, Michael J. Ophoff, Roel O’Donovan, Michael Corvin, Aiden Cichon, Sven Sullivan, Patrick F Mol Psychiatry Article Prior to the genome-wide association era, candidate gene studies were a major approach in schizophrenia genetics. In this invited review, we consider the current status of 25 historical candidate genes for schizophrenia (e.g., COMT, DISC1, DTNBP1, and NRG1). The initial study for 24 of these genes explicitly evaluated common variant hypotheses about schizophrenia. Our evaluation included a meta-analysis of the candidate gene literature, incorporation of the results of the largest genomic study yet published for schizophrenia, ratings from informed researchers who have published on these genes, and ratings from 24 schizophrenia geneticists. On the basis of current empirical evidence and mostly consensual assessments of informed opinion, it appears that the historical candidate gene literature did not yield clear insights into the genetic basis of schizophrenia. A likely reason why historical candidate gene studies did not achieve their primary aims is inadequate statistical power. However, the considerable efforts embodied in these early studies unquestionably set the stage for current successes in genomic approaches to schizophrenia. 2015-03-10 2015-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4414705/ /pubmed/25754081 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/mp.2015.16 Text en http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use:http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms |
spellingShingle | Article Farrell, Martilias Werge, Thomas Sklar, Pamela Owen, Michael J. Ophoff, Roel O’Donovan, Michael Corvin, Aiden Cichon, Sven Sullivan, Patrick F Evaluating Historical Candidate Genes for Schizophrenia |
title | Evaluating Historical Candidate Genes for Schizophrenia |
title_full | Evaluating Historical Candidate Genes for Schizophrenia |
title_fullStr | Evaluating Historical Candidate Genes for Schizophrenia |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating Historical Candidate Genes for Schizophrenia |
title_short | Evaluating Historical Candidate Genes for Schizophrenia |
title_sort | evaluating historical candidate genes for schizophrenia |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4414705/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25754081 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/mp.2015.16 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT farrellmartilias evaluatinghistoricalcandidategenesforschizophrenia AT wergethomas evaluatinghistoricalcandidategenesforschizophrenia AT sklarpamela evaluatinghistoricalcandidategenesforschizophrenia AT owenmichaelj evaluatinghistoricalcandidategenesforschizophrenia AT ophoffroel evaluatinghistoricalcandidategenesforschizophrenia AT odonovanmichael evaluatinghistoricalcandidategenesforschizophrenia AT corvinaiden evaluatinghistoricalcandidategenesforschizophrenia AT cichonsven evaluatinghistoricalcandidategenesforschizophrenia AT sullivanpatrickf evaluatinghistoricalcandidategenesforschizophrenia |