Cargando…

Tensile properties of the rectal and sigmoid colon: a comparative analysis of human and porcine tissue

For many patients, rectal catheters are an effective means to manage bowel incontinence. Unfortunately, the incidence of catheter leakage in these patients remains troublingly high. Matching the mechanical properties of the catheter and the surrounding tissue may improve the catheter seal and reduce...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Christensen, Michael B, Oberg, Kevin, Wolchok, Jeffrey C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4414857/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25977885
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-0922-x
_version_ 1782368993714110464
author Christensen, Michael B
Oberg, Kevin
Wolchok, Jeffrey C
author_facet Christensen, Michael B
Oberg, Kevin
Wolchok, Jeffrey C
author_sort Christensen, Michael B
collection PubMed
description For many patients, rectal catheters are an effective means to manage bowel incontinence. Unfortunately, the incidence of catheter leakage in these patients remains troublingly high. Matching the mechanical properties of the catheter and the surrounding tissue may improve the catheter seal and reduce leakage. However, little data is available on the mechanical properties of colorectal tissue. Therefore, our group examined the mechanical properties of colorectal tissue obtained from both a common animal model and humans. Uniaxial tension tests were performed to determine the effects of location, orientation, and species (porcine and human) on bowel tissue tensile mechanical properties. Bowel tissue ultimate strength, elongation at failure, and elastic modulus were derived from these tests and statistically analyzed. Ultimate tensile strength (0.58 MPa, 0.87 MPa), elongation at failure (113.19%, 62.81%), and elastic modulus (1.83 MPa, 5.18 MPa) for porcine and human samples respectively exhibited significant differences based on species. Generally, human tissues were stronger and less compliant than their porcine counterparts. Furthermore, harvest site location and testing orientation significantly affected several mechanical properties in porcine derived tissues, but very few in human tissues. The data suggests that porcine colorectal tissue does not accurately model human colorectal tissue mechanical properties. Ultimately, the tensile properties reported herein may be used to help guide the design of next generation rectal catheters with tissue mimetic properties, as well as aid in the development of physical and computer based bowel models.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4414857
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44148572015-05-14 Tensile properties of the rectal and sigmoid colon: a comparative analysis of human and porcine tissue Christensen, Michael B Oberg, Kevin Wolchok, Jeffrey C Springerplus Research For many patients, rectal catheters are an effective means to manage bowel incontinence. Unfortunately, the incidence of catheter leakage in these patients remains troublingly high. Matching the mechanical properties of the catheter and the surrounding tissue may improve the catheter seal and reduce leakage. However, little data is available on the mechanical properties of colorectal tissue. Therefore, our group examined the mechanical properties of colorectal tissue obtained from both a common animal model and humans. Uniaxial tension tests were performed to determine the effects of location, orientation, and species (porcine and human) on bowel tissue tensile mechanical properties. Bowel tissue ultimate strength, elongation at failure, and elastic modulus were derived from these tests and statistically analyzed. Ultimate tensile strength (0.58 MPa, 0.87 MPa), elongation at failure (113.19%, 62.81%), and elastic modulus (1.83 MPa, 5.18 MPa) for porcine and human samples respectively exhibited significant differences based on species. Generally, human tissues were stronger and less compliant than their porcine counterparts. Furthermore, harvest site location and testing orientation significantly affected several mechanical properties in porcine derived tissues, but very few in human tissues. The data suggests that porcine colorectal tissue does not accurately model human colorectal tissue mechanical properties. Ultimately, the tensile properties reported herein may be used to help guide the design of next generation rectal catheters with tissue mimetic properties, as well as aid in the development of physical and computer based bowel models. Springer International Publishing 2015-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4414857/ /pubmed/25977885 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-0922-x Text en © Christensen et al.; licensee Springer. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Research
Christensen, Michael B
Oberg, Kevin
Wolchok, Jeffrey C
Tensile properties of the rectal and sigmoid colon: a comparative analysis of human and porcine tissue
title Tensile properties of the rectal and sigmoid colon: a comparative analysis of human and porcine tissue
title_full Tensile properties of the rectal and sigmoid colon: a comparative analysis of human and porcine tissue
title_fullStr Tensile properties of the rectal and sigmoid colon: a comparative analysis of human and porcine tissue
title_full_unstemmed Tensile properties of the rectal and sigmoid colon: a comparative analysis of human and porcine tissue
title_short Tensile properties of the rectal and sigmoid colon: a comparative analysis of human and porcine tissue
title_sort tensile properties of the rectal and sigmoid colon: a comparative analysis of human and porcine tissue
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4414857/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25977885
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-0922-x
work_keys_str_mv AT christensenmichaelb tensilepropertiesoftherectalandsigmoidcolonacomparativeanalysisofhumanandporcinetissue
AT obergkevin tensilepropertiesoftherectalandsigmoidcolonacomparativeanalysisofhumanandporcinetissue
AT wolchokjeffreyc tensilepropertiesoftherectalandsigmoidcolonacomparativeanalysisofhumanandporcinetissue