Cargando…

Evaluation of the specificity of [(18)F]fludarabine PET/CT in a xenograft model of follicular lymphoma: comparison with [(18)F]FDG and impact of rituximab therapy

BACKGROUND: [(18)F]Fludarabine is a novel positron emission tomography (PET) radiotracer for imaging lymphoma. The purpose of this preclinical study was to evaluate the robustness of [(18)F]fludarabine during rituximab therapy. In addition, a comparison was made between [(18)F]fludarabine and [(18)F...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hovhannisyan, Narinée, Guillouet, Stéphane, Fillesoye, Fabien, Dhilly, Martine, Patin, Delphine, Galateau, Françoise, Leporrier, Michel, Barré, Louisa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4414862/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25977881
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-015-0101-7
_version_ 1782368994843426816
author Hovhannisyan, Narinée
Guillouet, Stéphane
Fillesoye, Fabien
Dhilly, Martine
Patin, Delphine
Galateau, Françoise
Leporrier, Michel
Barré, Louisa
author_facet Hovhannisyan, Narinée
Guillouet, Stéphane
Fillesoye, Fabien
Dhilly, Martine
Patin, Delphine
Galateau, Françoise
Leporrier, Michel
Barré, Louisa
author_sort Hovhannisyan, Narinée
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: [(18)F]Fludarabine is a novel positron emission tomography (PET) radiotracer for imaging lymphoma. The purpose of this preclinical study was to evaluate the robustness of [(18)F]fludarabine during rituximab therapy. In addition, a comparison was made between [(18)F]fludarabine and [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose ([(18)F]FDG) with regard to their concordance with histologically derived data. METHODS: CB17-SCID mice bearing human follicular DOHH-2 lymphoma were treated once weekly with rituximab (10 mg/kg) or physiological saline over 3 weeks. To obtain the tracer uptake in the metabolically active volume of the tumour (MAVT), a background-level threshold was applied to the volume of interest (VOI) defined on computed tomography (CT) image. The tumour uptake analysis was performed with MAVT-based segmentation for data analysis of sequential [(18)F]fludarabine PET/CT studies and with total tumour-based segmentation for comparison with histologically derived data. RESULTS: The correlation between the MAVT and [(18)F]fludarabine accumulation (%ID) in those viable tissues was equally significant for both vehicle- or rituximab-treated mice; for these latter, the presence of lymphoid tissues at the end of imaging sessions was confirmed histologically. A stronger correlation was demonstrated between quantitative values extracted from [(18)F]fludarabine-PET and histology (r(2) = 0.91, p < 0.001) when compared to [(18)F]FDG-PET (r(2) = 0.55, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: [(18)F]Fludarabine uptake in the follicular lymphoma model compared favourably with [(18)F]FDG in terms of specificity for PET imaging and also remained robust for persistent viable tissues following rituximab therapy. [(18)F]Fludarabine PET/CT may be a promising approach to evaluate lymphoma, including their surveillance during therapy. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13550-015-0101-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4414862
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44148622015-05-14 Evaluation of the specificity of [(18)F]fludarabine PET/CT in a xenograft model of follicular lymphoma: comparison with [(18)F]FDG and impact of rituximab therapy Hovhannisyan, Narinée Guillouet, Stéphane Fillesoye, Fabien Dhilly, Martine Patin, Delphine Galateau, Françoise Leporrier, Michel Barré, Louisa EJNMMI Res Original Research BACKGROUND: [(18)F]Fludarabine is a novel positron emission tomography (PET) radiotracer for imaging lymphoma. The purpose of this preclinical study was to evaluate the robustness of [(18)F]fludarabine during rituximab therapy. In addition, a comparison was made between [(18)F]fludarabine and [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose ([(18)F]FDG) with regard to their concordance with histologically derived data. METHODS: CB17-SCID mice bearing human follicular DOHH-2 lymphoma were treated once weekly with rituximab (10 mg/kg) or physiological saline over 3 weeks. To obtain the tracer uptake in the metabolically active volume of the tumour (MAVT), a background-level threshold was applied to the volume of interest (VOI) defined on computed tomography (CT) image. The tumour uptake analysis was performed with MAVT-based segmentation for data analysis of sequential [(18)F]fludarabine PET/CT studies and with total tumour-based segmentation for comparison with histologically derived data. RESULTS: The correlation between the MAVT and [(18)F]fludarabine accumulation (%ID) in those viable tissues was equally significant for both vehicle- or rituximab-treated mice; for these latter, the presence of lymphoid tissues at the end of imaging sessions was confirmed histologically. A stronger correlation was demonstrated between quantitative values extracted from [(18)F]fludarabine-PET and histology (r(2) = 0.91, p < 0.001) when compared to [(18)F]FDG-PET (r(2) = 0.55, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: [(18)F]Fludarabine uptake in the follicular lymphoma model compared favourably with [(18)F]FDG in terms of specificity for PET imaging and also remained robust for persistent viable tissues following rituximab therapy. [(18)F]Fludarabine PET/CT may be a promising approach to evaluate lymphoma, including their surveillance during therapy. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13550-015-0101-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4414862/ /pubmed/25977881 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-015-0101-7 Text en © Hovhannisyan et al.; licensee Springer. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Hovhannisyan, Narinée
Guillouet, Stéphane
Fillesoye, Fabien
Dhilly, Martine
Patin, Delphine
Galateau, Françoise
Leporrier, Michel
Barré, Louisa
Evaluation of the specificity of [(18)F]fludarabine PET/CT in a xenograft model of follicular lymphoma: comparison with [(18)F]FDG and impact of rituximab therapy
title Evaluation of the specificity of [(18)F]fludarabine PET/CT in a xenograft model of follicular lymphoma: comparison with [(18)F]FDG and impact of rituximab therapy
title_full Evaluation of the specificity of [(18)F]fludarabine PET/CT in a xenograft model of follicular lymphoma: comparison with [(18)F]FDG and impact of rituximab therapy
title_fullStr Evaluation of the specificity of [(18)F]fludarabine PET/CT in a xenograft model of follicular lymphoma: comparison with [(18)F]FDG and impact of rituximab therapy
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the specificity of [(18)F]fludarabine PET/CT in a xenograft model of follicular lymphoma: comparison with [(18)F]FDG and impact of rituximab therapy
title_short Evaluation of the specificity of [(18)F]fludarabine PET/CT in a xenograft model of follicular lymphoma: comparison with [(18)F]FDG and impact of rituximab therapy
title_sort evaluation of the specificity of [(18)f]fludarabine pet/ct in a xenograft model of follicular lymphoma: comparison with [(18)f]fdg and impact of rituximab therapy
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4414862/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25977881
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-015-0101-7
work_keys_str_mv AT hovhannisyannarinee evaluationofthespecificityof18ffludarabinepetctinaxenograftmodeloffollicularlymphomacomparisonwith18ffdgandimpactofrituximabtherapy
AT guillouetstephane evaluationofthespecificityof18ffludarabinepetctinaxenograftmodeloffollicularlymphomacomparisonwith18ffdgandimpactofrituximabtherapy
AT fillesoyefabien evaluationofthespecificityof18ffludarabinepetctinaxenograftmodeloffollicularlymphomacomparisonwith18ffdgandimpactofrituximabtherapy
AT dhillymartine evaluationofthespecificityof18ffludarabinepetctinaxenograftmodeloffollicularlymphomacomparisonwith18ffdgandimpactofrituximabtherapy
AT patindelphine evaluationofthespecificityof18ffludarabinepetctinaxenograftmodeloffollicularlymphomacomparisonwith18ffdgandimpactofrituximabtherapy
AT galateaufrancoise evaluationofthespecificityof18ffludarabinepetctinaxenograftmodeloffollicularlymphomacomparisonwith18ffdgandimpactofrituximabtherapy
AT leporriermichel evaluationofthespecificityof18ffludarabinepetctinaxenograftmodeloffollicularlymphomacomparisonwith18ffdgandimpactofrituximabtherapy
AT barrelouisa evaluationofthespecificityof18ffludarabinepetctinaxenograftmodeloffollicularlymphomacomparisonwith18ffdgandimpactofrituximabtherapy