Cargando…

Family medicine training in Saudi Arabia: Are there any variations among different regions?

AIMS: The aim was to compare Eastern, Makkah, and Asir regions in term of residents’ perception of the achievement of training objectives, and to assess various rotations based on residents’ perception. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This cross-sectional study was done among family medicine residents in the E...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abu Zuhairah, Ammar R., Al-Dawood, Kasim M., Khamis, Amar H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4415125/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25983607
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2230-8229.155387
_version_ 1782369025538392064
author Abu Zuhairah, Ammar R.
Al-Dawood, Kasim M.
Khamis, Amar H.
author_facet Abu Zuhairah, Ammar R.
Al-Dawood, Kasim M.
Khamis, Amar H.
author_sort Abu Zuhairah, Ammar R.
collection PubMed
description AIMS: The aim was to compare Eastern, Makkah, and Asir regions in term of residents’ perception of the achievement of training objectives, and to assess various rotations based on residents’ perception. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This cross-sectional study was done among family medicine residents in the Eastern, Makkah, and Asir regions. METHODOLOGY: A questionnaire was developed by the investigator and validated by two experts. All residents, except R1 residents, were included. All data were collected by the investigator by direct contact with the residents. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Cronbach's alpha, analysis of variance, t-test, and univariate regression model as appropriate, were used. RESULTS: Reliability of the questionnaire was found to be 75.4%. One hundred and seven (response rate: 83.6%) residents completed the questionnaire. There were 51 (47.7%), 27 (25.2%), and 29 (27.1%) residents in the program in the Eastern region, Makkah, and Asir, respectively. The mean age was 29.1 ± 2.5 years; half of the residents were male, most of (83.2%) were married, and more than half (54.2%) of had worked in primary health care before joining the program. Overall, 45% of the residents perceived that they had achieved the training objectives. The highest rotations as perceived by the residents were psychiatry and otolaryngology while the lowest were orthopedics and ophthalmology. There were significant differences among the study regions with regard to the rotations in family medicine, internal medicine, orthopedics, general surgery, and emergency medicine. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, a good percentage of the residents perceived that they had achieved the training objectives. The rotations differed in the studied regions. Psychiatry and otolaryngology had the highest percentage of family medicine residents who perceived that they had achieved the training objectives while lowest was in internal medicine and obstetrics and gynecology. The highest rotations as perceived by the family medicine residents were psychiatry and otolaryngology while lowest were orthopedics and ophthalmology. Sharing of experience and further studies are needed to improve the program rotations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4415125
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44151252015-05-15 Family medicine training in Saudi Arabia: Are there any variations among different regions? Abu Zuhairah, Ammar R. Al-Dawood, Kasim M. Khamis, Amar H. J Family Community Med Medical Education AIMS: The aim was to compare Eastern, Makkah, and Asir regions in term of residents’ perception of the achievement of training objectives, and to assess various rotations based on residents’ perception. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This cross-sectional study was done among family medicine residents in the Eastern, Makkah, and Asir regions. METHODOLOGY: A questionnaire was developed by the investigator and validated by two experts. All residents, except R1 residents, were included. All data were collected by the investigator by direct contact with the residents. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Cronbach's alpha, analysis of variance, t-test, and univariate regression model as appropriate, were used. RESULTS: Reliability of the questionnaire was found to be 75.4%. One hundred and seven (response rate: 83.6%) residents completed the questionnaire. There were 51 (47.7%), 27 (25.2%), and 29 (27.1%) residents in the program in the Eastern region, Makkah, and Asir, respectively. The mean age was 29.1 ± 2.5 years; half of the residents were male, most of (83.2%) were married, and more than half (54.2%) of had worked in primary health care before joining the program. Overall, 45% of the residents perceived that they had achieved the training objectives. The highest rotations as perceived by the residents were psychiatry and otolaryngology while the lowest were orthopedics and ophthalmology. There were significant differences among the study regions with regard to the rotations in family medicine, internal medicine, orthopedics, general surgery, and emergency medicine. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, a good percentage of the residents perceived that they had achieved the training objectives. The rotations differed in the studied regions. Psychiatry and otolaryngology had the highest percentage of family medicine residents who perceived that they had achieved the training objectives while lowest was in internal medicine and obstetrics and gynecology. The highest rotations as perceived by the family medicine residents were psychiatry and otolaryngology while lowest were orthopedics and ophthalmology. Sharing of experience and further studies are needed to improve the program rotations. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4415125/ /pubmed/25983607 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2230-8229.155387 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Family and Community Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Medical Education
Abu Zuhairah, Ammar R.
Al-Dawood, Kasim M.
Khamis, Amar H.
Family medicine training in Saudi Arabia: Are there any variations among different regions?
title Family medicine training in Saudi Arabia: Are there any variations among different regions?
title_full Family medicine training in Saudi Arabia: Are there any variations among different regions?
title_fullStr Family medicine training in Saudi Arabia: Are there any variations among different regions?
title_full_unstemmed Family medicine training in Saudi Arabia: Are there any variations among different regions?
title_short Family medicine training in Saudi Arabia: Are there any variations among different regions?
title_sort family medicine training in saudi arabia: are there any variations among different regions?
topic Medical Education
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4415125/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25983607
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2230-8229.155387
work_keys_str_mv AT abuzuhairahammarr familymedicinetraininginsaudiarabiaarethereanyvariationsamongdifferentregions
AT aldawoodkasimm familymedicinetraininginsaudiarabiaarethereanyvariationsamongdifferentregions
AT khamisamarh familymedicinetraininginsaudiarabiaarethereanyvariationsamongdifferentregions