Cargando…

Diagnostic Implications of an Elevated Troponin in the Emergency Department

Objective. To determine the proportion of initial troponin (cTn) elevations associated with Type I MI versus other cardiovascular and noncardiovascular diagnoses in an emergency department (ED) and whether or not a relationship exists between the cTn level and the likelihood of Type I MI. Background...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yiadom, Maame Yaa, Jarolim, Petr, Jenkins, Cathy, Melanson, Stacy E. F., Conrad, Michael, Kosowsky, Joshua M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4415742/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25960590
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/157812
_version_ 1782369115481047040
author Yiadom, Maame Yaa
Jarolim, Petr
Jenkins, Cathy
Melanson, Stacy E. F.
Conrad, Michael
Kosowsky, Joshua M.
author_facet Yiadom, Maame Yaa
Jarolim, Petr
Jenkins, Cathy
Melanson, Stacy E. F.
Conrad, Michael
Kosowsky, Joshua M.
author_sort Yiadom, Maame Yaa
collection PubMed
description Objective. To determine the proportion of initial troponin (cTn) elevations associated with Type I MI versus other cardiovascular and noncardiovascular diagnoses in an emergency department (ED) and whether or not a relationship exists between the cTn level and the likelihood of Type I MI. Background. In the ED, cTn is used as a screening test for myocardial injury. However, the differential diagnosis for an initial positive cTn result is not clear. Methods. Hospital medical records were retrospectively reviewed for visits associated with an initial positive troponin I-ultra (cTnI), ≥0.05 μg/L. Elevated cTnI levels were stratified into low (0.05–0.09), medium (0.1–0.99), or high (≥1.0). Discharge diagnoses were classified into 3 diagnostic groups (Type I MI, other cardiovascular, or noncardiovascular). Results. Of 23,731 ED visits, 4,928 (21%) had cTnI testing. Of those tested, 16.3% had initial cTnI ≥0.05. Among those with elevated cTn, 11% were classified as Type I MI, 34% had other cardiovascular diagnoses, and 55% had a noncardiovascular diagnosis. Type I MI was more common with high cTnI levels (41% incidence) than among subjects with medium (9%) or low (6%). Conclusion. A positive cTn is most likely a noncardiovascular diagnosis, but Type I MI is far more common with cTnI levels ≥1.0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4415742
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44157422015-05-10 Diagnostic Implications of an Elevated Troponin in the Emergency Department Yiadom, Maame Yaa Jarolim, Petr Jenkins, Cathy Melanson, Stacy E. F. Conrad, Michael Kosowsky, Joshua M. Dis Markers Research Article Objective. To determine the proportion of initial troponin (cTn) elevations associated with Type I MI versus other cardiovascular and noncardiovascular diagnoses in an emergency department (ED) and whether or not a relationship exists between the cTn level and the likelihood of Type I MI. Background. In the ED, cTn is used as a screening test for myocardial injury. However, the differential diagnosis for an initial positive cTn result is not clear. Methods. Hospital medical records were retrospectively reviewed for visits associated with an initial positive troponin I-ultra (cTnI), ≥0.05 μg/L. Elevated cTnI levels were stratified into low (0.05–0.09), medium (0.1–0.99), or high (≥1.0). Discharge diagnoses were classified into 3 diagnostic groups (Type I MI, other cardiovascular, or noncardiovascular). Results. Of 23,731 ED visits, 4,928 (21%) had cTnI testing. Of those tested, 16.3% had initial cTnI ≥0.05. Among those with elevated cTn, 11% were classified as Type I MI, 34% had other cardiovascular diagnoses, and 55% had a noncardiovascular diagnosis. Type I MI was more common with high cTnI levels (41% incidence) than among subjects with medium (9%) or low (6%). Conclusion. A positive cTn is most likely a noncardiovascular diagnosis, but Type I MI is far more common with cTnI levels ≥1.0. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4415742/ /pubmed/25960590 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/157812 Text en Copyright © 2015 Maame Yaa Yiadom et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Yiadom, Maame Yaa
Jarolim, Petr
Jenkins, Cathy
Melanson, Stacy E. F.
Conrad, Michael
Kosowsky, Joshua M.
Diagnostic Implications of an Elevated Troponin in the Emergency Department
title Diagnostic Implications of an Elevated Troponin in the Emergency Department
title_full Diagnostic Implications of an Elevated Troponin in the Emergency Department
title_fullStr Diagnostic Implications of an Elevated Troponin in the Emergency Department
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic Implications of an Elevated Troponin in the Emergency Department
title_short Diagnostic Implications of an Elevated Troponin in the Emergency Department
title_sort diagnostic implications of an elevated troponin in the emergency department
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4415742/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25960590
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/157812
work_keys_str_mv AT yiadommaameyaa diagnosticimplicationsofanelevatedtroponinintheemergencydepartment
AT jarolimpetr diagnosticimplicationsofanelevatedtroponinintheemergencydepartment
AT jenkinscathy diagnosticimplicationsofanelevatedtroponinintheemergencydepartment
AT melansonstacyef diagnosticimplicationsofanelevatedtroponinintheemergencydepartment
AT conradmichael diagnosticimplicationsofanelevatedtroponinintheemergencydepartment
AT kosowskyjoshuam diagnosticimplicationsofanelevatedtroponinintheemergencydepartment