Cargando…

Critical Evaluation of Particle Size Distribution Models Using Soil Data Obtained with a Laser Diffraction Method

Mathematical descriptions of classical particle size distribution (PSD) data are often used to estimate soil hydraulic properties. Laser diffraction methods (LDM) now provide more detailed PSD measurements, but deriving a function to characterize the entire range of particle sizes is a major challen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weipeng, Wang, Jianli, Liu, Bingzi, Zhao, Jiabao, Zhang, Xiaopeng, Li, Yifan, Yan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4416045/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25927441
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125048
_version_ 1782369176455741440
author Weipeng, Wang
Jianli, Liu
Bingzi, Zhao
Jiabao, Zhang
Xiaopeng, Li
Yifan, Yan
author_facet Weipeng, Wang
Jianli, Liu
Bingzi, Zhao
Jiabao, Zhang
Xiaopeng, Li
Yifan, Yan
author_sort Weipeng, Wang
collection PubMed
description Mathematical descriptions of classical particle size distribution (PSD) data are often used to estimate soil hydraulic properties. Laser diffraction methods (LDM) now provide more detailed PSD measurements, but deriving a function to characterize the entire range of particle sizes is a major challenge. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of eighteen PSD functions for fitting LDM data sets from a wide range of soil textures. These models include five lognormal models, five logistic models, four van Genuchten models, two Fredlund models, a logarithmic model, and an Andersson model. The fits were evaluated using Akaike’s information criterion (AIC), adjusted R(2), and root-mean-square error (RMSE). The results indicated that the Fredlund models (FRED3 and FRED4) had the best performance for most of the soils studied, followed by one logistic growth function extension model (MLOG3) and three lognormal models (ONLG3, ORLG3, and SHCA3). The performance of most PSD models was better for soils with higher silt content and poorer for soils with higher clay and sand content. The FRED4 model best described the PSD of clay, silty clay, clay loam, silty clay loam, silty loam, loam, and sandy loam, whereas FRED3, MLOG3, ONLG3, ORLG3, and SHCA3 showed better performance for most soils studied.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4416045
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44160452015-05-07 Critical Evaluation of Particle Size Distribution Models Using Soil Data Obtained with a Laser Diffraction Method Weipeng, Wang Jianli, Liu Bingzi, Zhao Jiabao, Zhang Xiaopeng, Li Yifan, Yan PLoS One Research Article Mathematical descriptions of classical particle size distribution (PSD) data are often used to estimate soil hydraulic properties. Laser diffraction methods (LDM) now provide more detailed PSD measurements, but deriving a function to characterize the entire range of particle sizes is a major challenge. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of eighteen PSD functions for fitting LDM data sets from a wide range of soil textures. These models include five lognormal models, five logistic models, four van Genuchten models, two Fredlund models, a logarithmic model, and an Andersson model. The fits were evaluated using Akaike’s information criterion (AIC), adjusted R(2), and root-mean-square error (RMSE). The results indicated that the Fredlund models (FRED3 and FRED4) had the best performance for most of the soils studied, followed by one logistic growth function extension model (MLOG3) and three lognormal models (ONLG3, ORLG3, and SHCA3). The performance of most PSD models was better for soils with higher silt content and poorer for soils with higher clay and sand content. The FRED4 model best described the PSD of clay, silty clay, clay loam, silty clay loam, silty loam, loam, and sandy loam, whereas FRED3, MLOG3, ONLG3, ORLG3, and SHCA3 showed better performance for most soils studied. Public Library of Science 2015-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4416045/ /pubmed/25927441 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125048 Text en © 2015 Weipeng et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Weipeng, Wang
Jianli, Liu
Bingzi, Zhao
Jiabao, Zhang
Xiaopeng, Li
Yifan, Yan
Critical Evaluation of Particle Size Distribution Models Using Soil Data Obtained with a Laser Diffraction Method
title Critical Evaluation of Particle Size Distribution Models Using Soil Data Obtained with a Laser Diffraction Method
title_full Critical Evaluation of Particle Size Distribution Models Using Soil Data Obtained with a Laser Diffraction Method
title_fullStr Critical Evaluation of Particle Size Distribution Models Using Soil Data Obtained with a Laser Diffraction Method
title_full_unstemmed Critical Evaluation of Particle Size Distribution Models Using Soil Data Obtained with a Laser Diffraction Method
title_short Critical Evaluation of Particle Size Distribution Models Using Soil Data Obtained with a Laser Diffraction Method
title_sort critical evaluation of particle size distribution models using soil data obtained with a laser diffraction method
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4416045/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25927441
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125048
work_keys_str_mv AT weipengwang criticalevaluationofparticlesizedistributionmodelsusingsoildataobtainedwithalaserdiffractionmethod
AT jianliliu criticalevaluationofparticlesizedistributionmodelsusingsoildataobtainedwithalaserdiffractionmethod
AT bingzizhao criticalevaluationofparticlesizedistributionmodelsusingsoildataobtainedwithalaserdiffractionmethod
AT jiabaozhang criticalevaluationofparticlesizedistributionmodelsusingsoildataobtainedwithalaserdiffractionmethod
AT xiaopengli criticalevaluationofparticlesizedistributionmodelsusingsoildataobtainedwithalaserdiffractionmethod
AT yifanyan criticalevaluationofparticlesizedistributionmodelsusingsoildataobtainedwithalaserdiffractionmethod