Cargando…
Critical Evaluation of Particle Size Distribution Models Using Soil Data Obtained with a Laser Diffraction Method
Mathematical descriptions of classical particle size distribution (PSD) data are often used to estimate soil hydraulic properties. Laser diffraction methods (LDM) now provide more detailed PSD measurements, but deriving a function to characterize the entire range of particle sizes is a major challen...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4416045/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25927441 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125048 |
_version_ | 1782369176455741440 |
---|---|
author | Weipeng, Wang Jianli, Liu Bingzi, Zhao Jiabao, Zhang Xiaopeng, Li Yifan, Yan |
author_facet | Weipeng, Wang Jianli, Liu Bingzi, Zhao Jiabao, Zhang Xiaopeng, Li Yifan, Yan |
author_sort | Weipeng, Wang |
collection | PubMed |
description | Mathematical descriptions of classical particle size distribution (PSD) data are often used to estimate soil hydraulic properties. Laser diffraction methods (LDM) now provide more detailed PSD measurements, but deriving a function to characterize the entire range of particle sizes is a major challenge. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of eighteen PSD functions for fitting LDM data sets from a wide range of soil textures. These models include five lognormal models, five logistic models, four van Genuchten models, two Fredlund models, a logarithmic model, and an Andersson model. The fits were evaluated using Akaike’s information criterion (AIC), adjusted R(2), and root-mean-square error (RMSE). The results indicated that the Fredlund models (FRED3 and FRED4) had the best performance for most of the soils studied, followed by one logistic growth function extension model (MLOG3) and three lognormal models (ONLG3, ORLG3, and SHCA3). The performance of most PSD models was better for soils with higher silt content and poorer for soils with higher clay and sand content. The FRED4 model best described the PSD of clay, silty clay, clay loam, silty clay loam, silty loam, loam, and sandy loam, whereas FRED3, MLOG3, ONLG3, ORLG3, and SHCA3 showed better performance for most soils studied. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4416045 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44160452015-05-07 Critical Evaluation of Particle Size Distribution Models Using Soil Data Obtained with a Laser Diffraction Method Weipeng, Wang Jianli, Liu Bingzi, Zhao Jiabao, Zhang Xiaopeng, Li Yifan, Yan PLoS One Research Article Mathematical descriptions of classical particle size distribution (PSD) data are often used to estimate soil hydraulic properties. Laser diffraction methods (LDM) now provide more detailed PSD measurements, but deriving a function to characterize the entire range of particle sizes is a major challenge. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of eighteen PSD functions for fitting LDM data sets from a wide range of soil textures. These models include five lognormal models, five logistic models, four van Genuchten models, two Fredlund models, a logarithmic model, and an Andersson model. The fits were evaluated using Akaike’s information criterion (AIC), adjusted R(2), and root-mean-square error (RMSE). The results indicated that the Fredlund models (FRED3 and FRED4) had the best performance for most of the soils studied, followed by one logistic growth function extension model (MLOG3) and three lognormal models (ONLG3, ORLG3, and SHCA3). The performance of most PSD models was better for soils with higher silt content and poorer for soils with higher clay and sand content. The FRED4 model best described the PSD of clay, silty clay, clay loam, silty clay loam, silty loam, loam, and sandy loam, whereas FRED3, MLOG3, ONLG3, ORLG3, and SHCA3 showed better performance for most soils studied. Public Library of Science 2015-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4416045/ /pubmed/25927441 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125048 Text en © 2015 Weipeng et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Weipeng, Wang Jianli, Liu Bingzi, Zhao Jiabao, Zhang Xiaopeng, Li Yifan, Yan Critical Evaluation of Particle Size Distribution Models Using Soil Data Obtained with a Laser Diffraction Method |
title | Critical Evaluation of Particle Size Distribution Models Using Soil Data Obtained with a Laser Diffraction Method |
title_full | Critical Evaluation of Particle Size Distribution Models Using Soil Data Obtained with a Laser Diffraction Method |
title_fullStr | Critical Evaluation of Particle Size Distribution Models Using Soil Data Obtained with a Laser Diffraction Method |
title_full_unstemmed | Critical Evaluation of Particle Size Distribution Models Using Soil Data Obtained with a Laser Diffraction Method |
title_short | Critical Evaluation of Particle Size Distribution Models Using Soil Data Obtained with a Laser Diffraction Method |
title_sort | critical evaluation of particle size distribution models using soil data obtained with a laser diffraction method |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4416045/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25927441 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125048 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT weipengwang criticalevaluationofparticlesizedistributionmodelsusingsoildataobtainedwithalaserdiffractionmethod AT jianliliu criticalevaluationofparticlesizedistributionmodelsusingsoildataobtainedwithalaserdiffractionmethod AT bingzizhao criticalevaluationofparticlesizedistributionmodelsusingsoildataobtainedwithalaserdiffractionmethod AT jiabaozhang criticalevaluationofparticlesizedistributionmodelsusingsoildataobtainedwithalaserdiffractionmethod AT xiaopengli criticalevaluationofparticlesizedistributionmodelsusingsoildataobtainedwithalaserdiffractionmethod AT yifanyan criticalevaluationofparticlesizedistributionmodelsusingsoildataobtainedwithalaserdiffractionmethod |