Cargando…

Quality of care for OA: the effect of a point-of-care consultation recording template

Objective. The aims of this study were to determine the feasibility of introducing a computerized template for identifying quality of care during an OA consultation, describe quality of OA care in practices in which the template was introduced and assess the effect of the template on routinely recor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Edwards, John J., Jordan, Kelvin P., Peat, George, Bedson, John, Croft, Peter R., Hay, Elaine M., Dziedzic, Krysia S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4416084/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25336538
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keu411
_version_ 1782369179126464512
author Edwards, John J.
Jordan, Kelvin P.
Peat, George
Bedson, John
Croft, Peter R.
Hay, Elaine M.
Dziedzic, Krysia S.
author_facet Edwards, John J.
Jordan, Kelvin P.
Peat, George
Bedson, John
Croft, Peter R.
Hay, Elaine M.
Dziedzic, Krysia S.
author_sort Edwards, John J.
collection PubMed
description Objective. The aims of this study were to determine the feasibility of introducing a computerized template for identifying quality of care during an OA consultation, describe quality of OA care in practices in which the template was introduced and assess the effect of the template on routinely recorded clinician behaviour in those practices. Methods. A computerized template to assist the recording of care in consultations for patients with OA was installed in eight general practices. Eligible patients were those ≥45 years of age consulting for clinical OA during a 6 month period. The main outcomes were frequency of template triggering, achievement of quality indicators during the consultation (assessment of pain and function, assessment for first-line analgesics, provision of information, exercise advice, consideration of physiotherapy referral, weight loss advice) and change in routinely recorded clinician behaviour (diagnostic coding, prescribing, referral, use of radiography, weight records) compared with the 12 months prior to template installation. Results. The template was triggered for 1730 patients. Achievement of indicators ranged from 36% (for consideration of physiotherapy referral) to 63% (for pain assessment), with substantial variability between clinicians. There was an increase in prescription of recommended first-line analgesics following the template installation: paracetamol [odds ratio (OR) 1.49 (95% CI 1.22, 1.82) compared with pre-template] and topical NSAIDs [OR 1.95 (95% CI 1.61, 2.35)]. Conclusion. This new template is a feasible tool for capturing data during OA consultations to aid assessment of quality of care. It was associated with significant improvements in recommended care processes. However, strategies are needed to ensure consistent approaches between clinicians. Trial registration. http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN06984617/mosaics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4416084
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44160842015-05-06 Quality of care for OA: the effect of a point-of-care consultation recording template Edwards, John J. Jordan, Kelvin P. Peat, George Bedson, John Croft, Peter R. Hay, Elaine M. Dziedzic, Krysia S. Rheumatology (Oxford) Clinical Science Objective. The aims of this study were to determine the feasibility of introducing a computerized template for identifying quality of care during an OA consultation, describe quality of OA care in practices in which the template was introduced and assess the effect of the template on routinely recorded clinician behaviour in those practices. Methods. A computerized template to assist the recording of care in consultations for patients with OA was installed in eight general practices. Eligible patients were those ≥45 years of age consulting for clinical OA during a 6 month period. The main outcomes were frequency of template triggering, achievement of quality indicators during the consultation (assessment of pain and function, assessment for first-line analgesics, provision of information, exercise advice, consideration of physiotherapy referral, weight loss advice) and change in routinely recorded clinician behaviour (diagnostic coding, prescribing, referral, use of radiography, weight records) compared with the 12 months prior to template installation. Results. The template was triggered for 1730 patients. Achievement of indicators ranged from 36% (for consideration of physiotherapy referral) to 63% (for pain assessment), with substantial variability between clinicians. There was an increase in prescription of recommended first-line analgesics following the template installation: paracetamol [odds ratio (OR) 1.49 (95% CI 1.22, 1.82) compared with pre-template] and topical NSAIDs [OR 1.95 (95% CI 1.61, 2.35)]. Conclusion. This new template is a feasible tool for capturing data during OA consultations to aid assessment of quality of care. It was associated with significant improvements in recommended care processes. However, strategies are needed to ensure consistent approaches between clinicians. Trial registration. http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN06984617/mosaics. Oxford University Press 2015-05 2014-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4416084/ /pubmed/25336538 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keu411 Text en © The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Clinical Science
Edwards, John J.
Jordan, Kelvin P.
Peat, George
Bedson, John
Croft, Peter R.
Hay, Elaine M.
Dziedzic, Krysia S.
Quality of care for OA: the effect of a point-of-care consultation recording template
title Quality of care for OA: the effect of a point-of-care consultation recording template
title_full Quality of care for OA: the effect of a point-of-care consultation recording template
title_fullStr Quality of care for OA: the effect of a point-of-care consultation recording template
title_full_unstemmed Quality of care for OA: the effect of a point-of-care consultation recording template
title_short Quality of care for OA: the effect of a point-of-care consultation recording template
title_sort quality of care for oa: the effect of a point-of-care consultation recording template
topic Clinical Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4416084/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25336538
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keu411
work_keys_str_mv AT edwardsjohnj qualityofcareforoatheeffectofapointofcareconsultationrecordingtemplate
AT jordankelvinp qualityofcareforoatheeffectofapointofcareconsultationrecordingtemplate
AT peatgeorge qualityofcareforoatheeffectofapointofcareconsultationrecordingtemplate
AT bedsonjohn qualityofcareforoatheeffectofapointofcareconsultationrecordingtemplate
AT croftpeterr qualityofcareforoatheeffectofapointofcareconsultationrecordingtemplate
AT hayelainem qualityofcareforoatheeffectofapointofcareconsultationrecordingtemplate
AT dziedzickrysias qualityofcareforoatheeffectofapointofcareconsultationrecordingtemplate