Cargando…

Effect of prognostic classification on temsirolimus efficacy and safety in patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma: a retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND: Temsirolimus, a selective inhibitor of the mammalian target of rapamycin, has demonstrated clinical benefit versus investigator’s choice (INV) of therapy in patients with relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). METHODS: This post hoc study retrospectively assigned simplified Mant...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hess, Georg, Coiffier, Bertrand, Crump, Michael, Gisselbrecht, Christian, Offner, Fritz, Romaguera, Jorge, Kang, Lisa, Moran, Pádraig J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4416347/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25938001
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40164-015-0006-1
_version_ 1782369223430897664
author Hess, Georg
Coiffier, Bertrand
Crump, Michael
Gisselbrecht, Christian
Offner, Fritz
Romaguera, Jorge
Kang, Lisa
Moran, Pádraig J
author_facet Hess, Georg
Coiffier, Bertrand
Crump, Michael
Gisselbrecht, Christian
Offner, Fritz
Romaguera, Jorge
Kang, Lisa
Moran, Pádraig J
author_sort Hess, Georg
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Temsirolimus, a selective inhibitor of the mammalian target of rapamycin, has demonstrated clinical benefit versus investigator’s choice (INV) of therapy in patients with relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). METHODS: This post hoc study retrospectively assigned simplified Mantle Cell Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (MIPI) scores (ie, secondary MIPI) based on parameters at the time of randomization in patients with MCL (N = 162) who received temsirolimus 175 mg once weekly for 3 weeks followed by once-weekly 75 mg or 25 mg or the INV of active therapy. Outcomes were analyzed according to the low-, intermediate- or high-risk category. RESULTS: Patient distribution by MIPI risk category was 31%, 39%, and 30% in the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups, respectively. Among patients in all categories, objective response rate (complete response + partial response) was higher in patients in the temsirolimus 175/75-mg group versus the INV group, respectively: 42% versus 0% (low-risk); 33% versus 5% (intermediate-risk); 10% versus 0% (high-risk). Median progression-free survival was significantly longer with temsirolimus 175/75 mg versus INV, respectively, in patients with intermediate (4.3 vs 1.9 months; P = 0.035) or high (4.5 vs 1.6 months; P = 0.0025) risk, and a trend toward improvement was observed in patients with low risk (5.3 vs 2.6 months; P = 0.091). Improvement in median overall survival was observed with temsirolimus 175/75 mg versus INV in low-risk patients (18.0 vs 10.5 months, respectively; P = 0.069). CONCLUSIONS: This analysis suggests that, compared with INV, temsirolimus demonstrated benefit in all MIPI risk categories in patients with MCL. In all treatment groups, patients with high secondary MIPI scores at baseline faced a dismal prognosis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00117598. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40164-015-0006-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4416347
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44163472015-05-02 Effect of prognostic classification on temsirolimus efficacy and safety in patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma: a retrospective analysis Hess, Georg Coiffier, Bertrand Crump, Michael Gisselbrecht, Christian Offner, Fritz Romaguera, Jorge Kang, Lisa Moran, Pádraig J Exp Hematol Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Temsirolimus, a selective inhibitor of the mammalian target of rapamycin, has demonstrated clinical benefit versus investigator’s choice (INV) of therapy in patients with relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). METHODS: This post hoc study retrospectively assigned simplified Mantle Cell Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (MIPI) scores (ie, secondary MIPI) based on parameters at the time of randomization in patients with MCL (N = 162) who received temsirolimus 175 mg once weekly for 3 weeks followed by once-weekly 75 mg or 25 mg or the INV of active therapy. Outcomes were analyzed according to the low-, intermediate- or high-risk category. RESULTS: Patient distribution by MIPI risk category was 31%, 39%, and 30% in the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups, respectively. Among patients in all categories, objective response rate (complete response + partial response) was higher in patients in the temsirolimus 175/75-mg group versus the INV group, respectively: 42% versus 0% (low-risk); 33% versus 5% (intermediate-risk); 10% versus 0% (high-risk). Median progression-free survival was significantly longer with temsirolimus 175/75 mg versus INV, respectively, in patients with intermediate (4.3 vs 1.9 months; P = 0.035) or high (4.5 vs 1.6 months; P = 0.0025) risk, and a trend toward improvement was observed in patients with low risk (5.3 vs 2.6 months; P = 0.091). Improvement in median overall survival was observed with temsirolimus 175/75 mg versus INV in low-risk patients (18.0 vs 10.5 months, respectively; P = 0.069). CONCLUSIONS: This analysis suggests that, compared with INV, temsirolimus demonstrated benefit in all MIPI risk categories in patients with MCL. In all treatment groups, patients with high secondary MIPI scores at baseline faced a dismal prognosis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00117598. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40164-015-0006-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4416347/ /pubmed/25938001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40164-015-0006-1 Text en © Hess et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Hess, Georg
Coiffier, Bertrand
Crump, Michael
Gisselbrecht, Christian
Offner, Fritz
Romaguera, Jorge
Kang, Lisa
Moran, Pádraig J
Effect of prognostic classification on temsirolimus efficacy and safety in patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma: a retrospective analysis
title Effect of prognostic classification on temsirolimus efficacy and safety in patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma: a retrospective analysis
title_full Effect of prognostic classification on temsirolimus efficacy and safety in patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma: a retrospective analysis
title_fullStr Effect of prognostic classification on temsirolimus efficacy and safety in patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma: a retrospective analysis
title_full_unstemmed Effect of prognostic classification on temsirolimus efficacy and safety in patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma: a retrospective analysis
title_short Effect of prognostic classification on temsirolimus efficacy and safety in patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma: a retrospective analysis
title_sort effect of prognostic classification on temsirolimus efficacy and safety in patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma: a retrospective analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4416347/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25938001
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40164-015-0006-1
work_keys_str_mv AT hessgeorg effectofprognosticclassificationontemsirolimusefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorymantlecelllymphomaaretrospectiveanalysis
AT coiffierbertrand effectofprognosticclassificationontemsirolimusefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorymantlecelllymphomaaretrospectiveanalysis
AT crumpmichael effectofprognosticclassificationontemsirolimusefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorymantlecelllymphomaaretrospectiveanalysis
AT gisselbrechtchristian effectofprognosticclassificationontemsirolimusefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorymantlecelllymphomaaretrospectiveanalysis
AT offnerfritz effectofprognosticclassificationontemsirolimusefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorymantlecelllymphomaaretrospectiveanalysis
AT romaguerajorge effectofprognosticclassificationontemsirolimusefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorymantlecelllymphomaaretrospectiveanalysis
AT kanglisa effectofprognosticclassificationontemsirolimusefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorymantlecelllymphomaaretrospectiveanalysis
AT moranpadraigj effectofprognosticclassificationontemsirolimusefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorymantlecelllymphomaaretrospectiveanalysis