Cargando…

Coding of relative size in monkey inferotemporal cortex

We seldom mistake a closer object as being larger, even though its retinal image is bigger. One underlying mechanism could be to calculate the size of the retinal image relative to that of another nearby object. Here we set out to investigate whether single neurons in the monkey inferotemporal corte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vighneshvel, T., Arun, Sripati P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Physiological Society 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4416547/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25589595
http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00907.2014
_version_ 1782369251469819904
author Vighneshvel, T.
Arun, Sripati P.
author_facet Vighneshvel, T.
Arun, Sripati P.
author_sort Vighneshvel, T.
collection PubMed
description We seldom mistake a closer object as being larger, even though its retinal image is bigger. One underlying mechanism could be to calculate the size of the retinal image relative to that of another nearby object. Here we set out to investigate whether single neurons in the monkey inferotemporal cortex (IT) are sensitive to the relative size of parts in a display. Each neuron was tested on shapes containing two parts that could be conjoined or spatially separated. Each shape was presented in four versions created by combining the two parts at each of two possible sizes. In this design, neurons sensitive to the absolute size of parts would show the greatest response modulation when both parts are scaled up, whereas neurons encoding relative size would show similar responses. Our main findings are that 1) IT neurons responded similarly to all four versions of a shape, but tuning tended to be more consistent between versions with proportionately scaled parts; 2) in a subpopulation of cells, we observed interactions that resulted in similar responses to proportionately scaled parts; 3) these interactions developed together with sensitivity to absolute size for objects with conjoined parts but developed slightly later for objects with spatially separate parts. Taken together, our results demonstrate for the first time that there is a subpopulation of neurons in IT that encodes the relative size of parts in a display, forming a potential neural substrate for size constancy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4416547
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher American Physiological Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44165472015-05-13 Coding of relative size in monkey inferotemporal cortex Vighneshvel, T. Arun, Sripati P. J Neurophysiol Sensory Processing We seldom mistake a closer object as being larger, even though its retinal image is bigger. One underlying mechanism could be to calculate the size of the retinal image relative to that of another nearby object. Here we set out to investigate whether single neurons in the monkey inferotemporal cortex (IT) are sensitive to the relative size of parts in a display. Each neuron was tested on shapes containing two parts that could be conjoined or spatially separated. Each shape was presented in four versions created by combining the two parts at each of two possible sizes. In this design, neurons sensitive to the absolute size of parts would show the greatest response modulation when both parts are scaled up, whereas neurons encoding relative size would show similar responses. Our main findings are that 1) IT neurons responded similarly to all four versions of a shape, but tuning tended to be more consistent between versions with proportionately scaled parts; 2) in a subpopulation of cells, we observed interactions that resulted in similar responses to proportionately scaled parts; 3) these interactions developed together with sensitivity to absolute size for objects with conjoined parts but developed slightly later for objects with spatially separate parts. Taken together, our results demonstrate for the first time that there is a subpopulation of neurons in IT that encodes the relative size of parts in a display, forming a potential neural substrate for size constancy. American Physiological Society 2015-01-14 2015-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4416547/ /pubmed/25589595 http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00907.2014 Text en Copyright © 2015 the American Physiological Society Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution CC-BY 3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/deed.en_US) : © the American Physiological Society.
spellingShingle Sensory Processing
Vighneshvel, T.
Arun, Sripati P.
Coding of relative size in monkey inferotemporal cortex
title Coding of relative size in monkey inferotemporal cortex
title_full Coding of relative size in monkey inferotemporal cortex
title_fullStr Coding of relative size in monkey inferotemporal cortex
title_full_unstemmed Coding of relative size in monkey inferotemporal cortex
title_short Coding of relative size in monkey inferotemporal cortex
title_sort coding of relative size in monkey inferotemporal cortex
topic Sensory Processing
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4416547/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25589595
http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00907.2014
work_keys_str_mv AT vighneshvelt codingofrelativesizeinmonkeyinferotemporalcortex
AT arunsripatip codingofrelativesizeinmonkeyinferotemporalcortex