Cargando…

Anodal tDCS over the Motor Cortex on Prepared and Unprepared Responses in Young Adults

Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the primary motor cortex (M1) has been proposed as a possible therapeutic rehabilitation technique for motor impairment. However, despite extensive investigation into the effects of anodal tDCS on motor output, there is little information on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Conley, Alexander C., Marquez, Jodie, Parsons, Mark W., Fulham, W. Ross, Heathcote, Andrew, Karayanidis, Frini
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4416898/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25933204
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124509
_version_ 1782369294101774336
author Conley, Alexander C.
Marquez, Jodie
Parsons, Mark W.
Fulham, W. Ross
Heathcote, Andrew
Karayanidis, Frini
author_facet Conley, Alexander C.
Marquez, Jodie
Parsons, Mark W.
Fulham, W. Ross
Heathcote, Andrew
Karayanidis, Frini
author_sort Conley, Alexander C.
collection PubMed
description Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the primary motor cortex (M1) has been proposed as a possible therapeutic rehabilitation technique for motor impairment. However, despite extensive investigation into the effects of anodal tDCS on motor output, there is little information on how anodal tDCS affects response processes. In this study, we used a cued go/nogo task with both directional and non-directional cues to assess the effects of anodal tDCS over the dominant (left) primary motor cortex on prepared and unprepared motor responses. Three experiments explored whether the effectiveness of tDCS varied with timing between stimulation and test. Healthy, right-handed young adults participated in a double-blind randomised controlled design with crossover of anodal tDCS and sham stimulation. In Experiment 1, twenty-four healthy young adults received anodal tDCS over dominant M1 at least 40 mins before task performance. In Experiment 2, eight participants received anodal tDCS directly before task performance. In Experiment 3, twenty participants received anodal tDCS during task performance. In all three experiments, participants responded faster to directional compared to non-directional cues and with their right hand. However, anodal tDCS had no effect on go/nogo task performance at any stimulation – test interval. Bayesian analysis confirmed that anodal stimulation had no effect on response speed. We conclude that anodal tDCS over M1 does not improve response speed of prepared or unprepared responses of young adults in a go/nogo task.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4416898
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44168982015-05-07 Anodal tDCS over the Motor Cortex on Prepared and Unprepared Responses in Young Adults Conley, Alexander C. Marquez, Jodie Parsons, Mark W. Fulham, W. Ross Heathcote, Andrew Karayanidis, Frini PLoS One Research Article Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the primary motor cortex (M1) has been proposed as a possible therapeutic rehabilitation technique for motor impairment. However, despite extensive investigation into the effects of anodal tDCS on motor output, there is little information on how anodal tDCS affects response processes. In this study, we used a cued go/nogo task with both directional and non-directional cues to assess the effects of anodal tDCS over the dominant (left) primary motor cortex on prepared and unprepared motor responses. Three experiments explored whether the effectiveness of tDCS varied with timing between stimulation and test. Healthy, right-handed young adults participated in a double-blind randomised controlled design with crossover of anodal tDCS and sham stimulation. In Experiment 1, twenty-four healthy young adults received anodal tDCS over dominant M1 at least 40 mins before task performance. In Experiment 2, eight participants received anodal tDCS directly before task performance. In Experiment 3, twenty participants received anodal tDCS during task performance. In all three experiments, participants responded faster to directional compared to non-directional cues and with their right hand. However, anodal tDCS had no effect on go/nogo task performance at any stimulation – test interval. Bayesian analysis confirmed that anodal stimulation had no effect on response speed. We conclude that anodal tDCS over M1 does not improve response speed of prepared or unprepared responses of young adults in a go/nogo task. Public Library of Science 2015-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4416898/ /pubmed/25933204 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124509 Text en © 2015 Conley et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Conley, Alexander C.
Marquez, Jodie
Parsons, Mark W.
Fulham, W. Ross
Heathcote, Andrew
Karayanidis, Frini
Anodal tDCS over the Motor Cortex on Prepared and Unprepared Responses in Young Adults
title Anodal tDCS over the Motor Cortex on Prepared and Unprepared Responses in Young Adults
title_full Anodal tDCS over the Motor Cortex on Prepared and Unprepared Responses in Young Adults
title_fullStr Anodal tDCS over the Motor Cortex on Prepared and Unprepared Responses in Young Adults
title_full_unstemmed Anodal tDCS over the Motor Cortex on Prepared and Unprepared Responses in Young Adults
title_short Anodal tDCS over the Motor Cortex on Prepared and Unprepared Responses in Young Adults
title_sort anodal tdcs over the motor cortex on prepared and unprepared responses in young adults
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4416898/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25933204
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124509
work_keys_str_mv AT conleyalexanderc anodaltdcsoverthemotorcortexonpreparedandunpreparedresponsesinyoungadults
AT marquezjodie anodaltdcsoverthemotorcortexonpreparedandunpreparedresponsesinyoungadults
AT parsonsmarkw anodaltdcsoverthemotorcortexonpreparedandunpreparedresponsesinyoungadults
AT fulhamwross anodaltdcsoverthemotorcortexonpreparedandunpreparedresponsesinyoungadults
AT heathcoteandrew anodaltdcsoverthemotorcortexonpreparedandunpreparedresponsesinyoungadults
AT karayanidisfrini anodaltdcsoverthemotorcortexonpreparedandunpreparedresponsesinyoungadults