Cargando…

Measuring oral health literacy: a scoping review of existing tools

BACKGROUND: This article presents findings from a scoping review of tools used to measure oral health literacy. Internationally, interest in oral health literacy is driven by oral health disparities, particularly for disadvantaged groups, with conditions such as dental caries and periodontal disease...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dickson-Swift, Virginia, Kenny, Amanda, Farmer, Jane, Gussy, Mark, Larkins, Sarah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4417207/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25472659
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-14-148
_version_ 1782369330376212480
author Dickson-Swift, Virginia
Kenny, Amanda
Farmer, Jane
Gussy, Mark
Larkins, Sarah
author_facet Dickson-Swift, Virginia
Kenny, Amanda
Farmer, Jane
Gussy, Mark
Larkins, Sarah
author_sort Dickson-Swift, Virginia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This article presents findings from a scoping review of tools used to measure oral health literacy. Internationally, interest in oral health literacy is driven by oral health disparities, particularly for disadvantaged groups, with conditions such as dental caries and periodontal disease contributing substantially to the global burden of disease. The increasing focus on measuring oral health literacy aligns with reasons for measuring broader health literacy, that is, by assessing oral health literacy, decisions can be made about instigating interventions at policy and practice level to improve individual and population level oral health. There are numerous tools available that measure oral health literacy using a range of indicators. METHODS: A scoping review was designed to map the existing tools designed to measure oral health literacy (OHL). Key search terms were developed and mapped. Selected databases were used that identified 32 relevant studies reporting a range of OHL tools. RESULTS: We identified 32 articles that reported a range of oral health literacy tools. Many of the studies used the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Dentistry (REALD) and/or the Test of Functional Health Literacy in Dentistry (ToFHLiD) that were developed from earlier tools designed to measure broader health literacy. These tools have been widely criticised for providing only an approximate measure of OHL based mainly on word recognition. A number of newer tools have included new measures of oral health literacy including numeracy and oral health conceptual knowledge however tools that measure important indicators of oral health literacy such as service navigation are rare. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this scoping exercise confirm our findings from preliminary scans that the majority of tools are heavily biased towards word recognition, numeracy and reading skills, rather than what this means in terms of health behaviours and service utilisation. More recent developments have attempted to incorporate other aspects considered important, including decision making and service navigation. The incorporation of these aspects into newer tools will provide oral health researchers and policy makers with further evidence of the importance of oral health literacy when designing interventions to improve oral health.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4417207
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44172072015-05-03 Measuring oral health literacy: a scoping review of existing tools Dickson-Swift, Virginia Kenny, Amanda Farmer, Jane Gussy, Mark Larkins, Sarah BMC Oral Health Research Article BACKGROUND: This article presents findings from a scoping review of tools used to measure oral health literacy. Internationally, interest in oral health literacy is driven by oral health disparities, particularly for disadvantaged groups, with conditions such as dental caries and periodontal disease contributing substantially to the global burden of disease. The increasing focus on measuring oral health literacy aligns with reasons for measuring broader health literacy, that is, by assessing oral health literacy, decisions can be made about instigating interventions at policy and practice level to improve individual and population level oral health. There are numerous tools available that measure oral health literacy using a range of indicators. METHODS: A scoping review was designed to map the existing tools designed to measure oral health literacy (OHL). Key search terms were developed and mapped. Selected databases were used that identified 32 relevant studies reporting a range of OHL tools. RESULTS: We identified 32 articles that reported a range of oral health literacy tools. Many of the studies used the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Dentistry (REALD) and/or the Test of Functional Health Literacy in Dentistry (ToFHLiD) that were developed from earlier tools designed to measure broader health literacy. These tools have been widely criticised for providing only an approximate measure of OHL based mainly on word recognition. A number of newer tools have included new measures of oral health literacy including numeracy and oral health conceptual knowledge however tools that measure important indicators of oral health literacy such as service navigation are rare. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this scoping exercise confirm our findings from preliminary scans that the majority of tools are heavily biased towards word recognition, numeracy and reading skills, rather than what this means in terms of health behaviours and service utilisation. More recent developments have attempted to incorporate other aspects considered important, including decision making and service navigation. The incorporation of these aspects into newer tools will provide oral health researchers and policy makers with further evidence of the importance of oral health literacy when designing interventions to improve oral health. BioMed Central 2014-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4417207/ /pubmed/25472659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-14-148 Text en © Dickson-Swift et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Dickson-Swift, Virginia
Kenny, Amanda
Farmer, Jane
Gussy, Mark
Larkins, Sarah
Measuring oral health literacy: a scoping review of existing tools
title Measuring oral health literacy: a scoping review of existing tools
title_full Measuring oral health literacy: a scoping review of existing tools
title_fullStr Measuring oral health literacy: a scoping review of existing tools
title_full_unstemmed Measuring oral health literacy: a scoping review of existing tools
title_short Measuring oral health literacy: a scoping review of existing tools
title_sort measuring oral health literacy: a scoping review of existing tools
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4417207/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25472659
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-14-148
work_keys_str_mv AT dicksonswiftvirginia measuringoralhealthliteracyascopingreviewofexistingtools
AT kennyamanda measuringoralhealthliteracyascopingreviewofexistingtools
AT farmerjane measuringoralhealthliteracyascopingreviewofexistingtools
AT gussymark measuringoralhealthliteracyascopingreviewofexistingtools
AT larkinssarah measuringoralhealthliteracyascopingreviewofexistingtools