Cargando…
Combining macula clinical signs and patient characteristics for age-related macular degeneration diagnosis: a machine learning approach
BACKGROUND: To investigate machine learning methods, ranging from simpler interpretable techniques to complex (non-linear) “black-box” approaches, for automated diagnosis of Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD). METHODS: Data from healthy subjects and patients diagnosed with AMD or other retinal d...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4417241/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25623470 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2415-15-10 |
_version_ | 1782369338426130432 |
---|---|
author | Fraccaro, Paolo Nicolo, Massimo Bonetto, Monica Giacomini, Mauro Weller, Peter Traverso, Carlo Enrico Prosperi, Mattia OSullivan, Dympna |
author_facet | Fraccaro, Paolo Nicolo, Massimo Bonetto, Monica Giacomini, Mauro Weller, Peter Traverso, Carlo Enrico Prosperi, Mattia OSullivan, Dympna |
author_sort | Fraccaro, Paolo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To investigate machine learning methods, ranging from simpler interpretable techniques to complex (non-linear) “black-box” approaches, for automated diagnosis of Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD). METHODS: Data from healthy subjects and patients diagnosed with AMD or other retinal diseases were collected during routine visits via an Electronic Health Record (EHR) system. Patients’ attributes included demographics and, for each eye, presence/absence of major AMD-related clinical signs (soft drusen, retinal pigment epitelium, defects/pigment mottling, depigmentation area, subretinal haemorrhage, subretinal fluid, macula thickness, macular scar, subretinal fibrosis). Interpretable techniques known as white box methods including logistic regression and decision trees as well as less interpreitable techniques known as black box methods, such as support vector machines (SVM), random forests and AdaBoost, were used to develop models (trained and validated on unseen data) to diagnose AMD. The gold standard was confirmed diagnosis of AMD by physicians. Sensitivity, specificity and area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) were used to assess performance. RESULTS: Study population included 487 patients (912 eyes). In terms of AUC, random forests, logistic regression and adaboost showed a mean performance of (0.92), followed by SVM and decision trees (0.90). All machine learning models identified soft drusen and age as the most discriminating variables in clinicians’ decision pathways to diagnose AMD. CONCLUSIONS: Both black-box and white box methods performed well in identifying diagnoses of AMD and their decision pathways. Machine learning models developed through the proposed approach, relying on clinical signs identified by retinal specialists, could be embedded into EHR to provide physicians with real time (interpretable) support. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2415-15-10) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4417241 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44172412015-05-03 Combining macula clinical signs and patient characteristics for age-related macular degeneration diagnosis: a machine learning approach Fraccaro, Paolo Nicolo, Massimo Bonetto, Monica Giacomini, Mauro Weller, Peter Traverso, Carlo Enrico Prosperi, Mattia OSullivan, Dympna BMC Ophthalmol Technical Advance BACKGROUND: To investigate machine learning methods, ranging from simpler interpretable techniques to complex (non-linear) “black-box” approaches, for automated diagnosis of Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD). METHODS: Data from healthy subjects and patients diagnosed with AMD or other retinal diseases were collected during routine visits via an Electronic Health Record (EHR) system. Patients’ attributes included demographics and, for each eye, presence/absence of major AMD-related clinical signs (soft drusen, retinal pigment epitelium, defects/pigment mottling, depigmentation area, subretinal haemorrhage, subretinal fluid, macula thickness, macular scar, subretinal fibrosis). Interpretable techniques known as white box methods including logistic regression and decision trees as well as less interpreitable techniques known as black box methods, such as support vector machines (SVM), random forests and AdaBoost, were used to develop models (trained and validated on unseen data) to diagnose AMD. The gold standard was confirmed diagnosis of AMD by physicians. Sensitivity, specificity and area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) were used to assess performance. RESULTS: Study population included 487 patients (912 eyes). In terms of AUC, random forests, logistic regression and adaboost showed a mean performance of (0.92), followed by SVM and decision trees (0.90). All machine learning models identified soft drusen and age as the most discriminating variables in clinicians’ decision pathways to diagnose AMD. CONCLUSIONS: Both black-box and white box methods performed well in identifying diagnoses of AMD and their decision pathways. Machine learning models developed through the proposed approach, relying on clinical signs identified by retinal specialists, could be embedded into EHR to provide physicians with real time (interpretable) support. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2415-15-10) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4417241/ /pubmed/25623470 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2415-15-10 Text en © Fraccaro et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Technical Advance Fraccaro, Paolo Nicolo, Massimo Bonetto, Monica Giacomini, Mauro Weller, Peter Traverso, Carlo Enrico Prosperi, Mattia OSullivan, Dympna Combining macula clinical signs and patient characteristics for age-related macular degeneration diagnosis: a machine learning approach |
title | Combining macula clinical signs and patient characteristics for age-related macular degeneration diagnosis: a machine learning approach |
title_full | Combining macula clinical signs and patient characteristics for age-related macular degeneration diagnosis: a machine learning approach |
title_fullStr | Combining macula clinical signs and patient characteristics for age-related macular degeneration diagnosis: a machine learning approach |
title_full_unstemmed | Combining macula clinical signs and patient characteristics for age-related macular degeneration diagnosis: a machine learning approach |
title_short | Combining macula clinical signs and patient characteristics for age-related macular degeneration diagnosis: a machine learning approach |
title_sort | combining macula clinical signs and patient characteristics for age-related macular degeneration diagnosis: a machine learning approach |
topic | Technical Advance |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4417241/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25623470 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2415-15-10 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fraccaropaolo combiningmaculaclinicalsignsandpatientcharacteristicsforagerelatedmaculardegenerationdiagnosisamachinelearningapproach AT nicolomassimo combiningmaculaclinicalsignsandpatientcharacteristicsforagerelatedmaculardegenerationdiagnosisamachinelearningapproach AT bonettomonica combiningmaculaclinicalsignsandpatientcharacteristicsforagerelatedmaculardegenerationdiagnosisamachinelearningapproach AT giacominimauro combiningmaculaclinicalsignsandpatientcharacteristicsforagerelatedmaculardegenerationdiagnosisamachinelearningapproach AT wellerpeter combiningmaculaclinicalsignsandpatientcharacteristicsforagerelatedmaculardegenerationdiagnosisamachinelearningapproach AT traversocarloenrico combiningmaculaclinicalsignsandpatientcharacteristicsforagerelatedmaculardegenerationdiagnosisamachinelearningapproach AT prosperimattia combiningmaculaclinicalsignsandpatientcharacteristicsforagerelatedmaculardegenerationdiagnosisamachinelearningapproach AT osullivandympna combiningmaculaclinicalsignsandpatientcharacteristicsforagerelatedmaculardegenerationdiagnosisamachinelearningapproach |