Cargando…

Combining macula clinical signs and patient characteristics for age-related macular degeneration diagnosis: a machine learning approach

BACKGROUND: To investigate machine learning methods, ranging from simpler interpretable techniques to complex (non-linear) “black-box” approaches, for automated diagnosis of Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD). METHODS: Data from healthy subjects and patients diagnosed with AMD or other retinal d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fraccaro, Paolo, Nicolo, Massimo, Bonetto, Monica, Giacomini, Mauro, Weller, Peter, Traverso, Carlo Enrico, Prosperi, Mattia, OSullivan, Dympna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4417241/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25623470
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2415-15-10
_version_ 1782369338426130432
author Fraccaro, Paolo
Nicolo, Massimo
Bonetto, Monica
Giacomini, Mauro
Weller, Peter
Traverso, Carlo Enrico
Prosperi, Mattia
OSullivan, Dympna
author_facet Fraccaro, Paolo
Nicolo, Massimo
Bonetto, Monica
Giacomini, Mauro
Weller, Peter
Traverso, Carlo Enrico
Prosperi, Mattia
OSullivan, Dympna
author_sort Fraccaro, Paolo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To investigate machine learning methods, ranging from simpler interpretable techniques to complex (non-linear) “black-box” approaches, for automated diagnosis of Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD). METHODS: Data from healthy subjects and patients diagnosed with AMD or other retinal diseases were collected during routine visits via an Electronic Health Record (EHR) system. Patients’ attributes included demographics and, for each eye, presence/absence of major AMD-related clinical signs (soft drusen, retinal pigment epitelium, defects/pigment mottling, depigmentation area, subretinal haemorrhage, subretinal fluid, macula thickness, macular scar, subretinal fibrosis). Interpretable techniques known as white box methods including logistic regression and decision trees as well as less interpreitable techniques known as black box methods, such as support vector machines (SVM), random forests and AdaBoost, were used to develop models (trained and validated on unseen data) to diagnose AMD. The gold standard was confirmed diagnosis of AMD by physicians. Sensitivity, specificity and area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) were used to assess performance. RESULTS: Study population included 487 patients (912 eyes). In terms of AUC, random forests, logistic regression and adaboost showed a mean performance of (0.92), followed by SVM and decision trees (0.90). All machine learning models identified soft drusen and age as the most discriminating variables in clinicians’ decision pathways to diagnose AMD. CONCLUSIONS: Both black-box and white box methods performed well in identifying diagnoses of AMD and their decision pathways. Machine learning models developed through the proposed approach, relying on clinical signs identified by retinal specialists, could be embedded into EHR to provide physicians with real time (interpretable) support. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2415-15-10) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4417241
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44172412015-05-03 Combining macula clinical signs and patient characteristics for age-related macular degeneration diagnosis: a machine learning approach Fraccaro, Paolo Nicolo, Massimo Bonetto, Monica Giacomini, Mauro Weller, Peter Traverso, Carlo Enrico Prosperi, Mattia OSullivan, Dympna BMC Ophthalmol Technical Advance BACKGROUND: To investigate machine learning methods, ranging from simpler interpretable techniques to complex (non-linear) “black-box” approaches, for automated diagnosis of Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD). METHODS: Data from healthy subjects and patients diagnosed with AMD or other retinal diseases were collected during routine visits via an Electronic Health Record (EHR) system. Patients’ attributes included demographics and, for each eye, presence/absence of major AMD-related clinical signs (soft drusen, retinal pigment epitelium, defects/pigment mottling, depigmentation area, subretinal haemorrhage, subretinal fluid, macula thickness, macular scar, subretinal fibrosis). Interpretable techniques known as white box methods including logistic regression and decision trees as well as less interpreitable techniques known as black box methods, such as support vector machines (SVM), random forests and AdaBoost, were used to develop models (trained and validated on unseen data) to diagnose AMD. The gold standard was confirmed diagnosis of AMD by physicians. Sensitivity, specificity and area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) were used to assess performance. RESULTS: Study population included 487 patients (912 eyes). In terms of AUC, random forests, logistic regression and adaboost showed a mean performance of (0.92), followed by SVM and decision trees (0.90). All machine learning models identified soft drusen and age as the most discriminating variables in clinicians’ decision pathways to diagnose AMD. CONCLUSIONS: Both black-box and white box methods performed well in identifying diagnoses of AMD and their decision pathways. Machine learning models developed through the proposed approach, relying on clinical signs identified by retinal specialists, could be embedded into EHR to provide physicians with real time (interpretable) support. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2415-15-10) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4417241/ /pubmed/25623470 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2415-15-10 Text en © Fraccaro et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Technical Advance
Fraccaro, Paolo
Nicolo, Massimo
Bonetto, Monica
Giacomini, Mauro
Weller, Peter
Traverso, Carlo Enrico
Prosperi, Mattia
OSullivan, Dympna
Combining macula clinical signs and patient characteristics for age-related macular degeneration diagnosis: a machine learning approach
title Combining macula clinical signs and patient characteristics for age-related macular degeneration diagnosis: a machine learning approach
title_full Combining macula clinical signs and patient characteristics for age-related macular degeneration diagnosis: a machine learning approach
title_fullStr Combining macula clinical signs and patient characteristics for age-related macular degeneration diagnosis: a machine learning approach
title_full_unstemmed Combining macula clinical signs and patient characteristics for age-related macular degeneration diagnosis: a machine learning approach
title_short Combining macula clinical signs and patient characteristics for age-related macular degeneration diagnosis: a machine learning approach
title_sort combining macula clinical signs and patient characteristics for age-related macular degeneration diagnosis: a machine learning approach
topic Technical Advance
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4417241/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25623470
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2415-15-10
work_keys_str_mv AT fraccaropaolo combiningmaculaclinicalsignsandpatientcharacteristicsforagerelatedmaculardegenerationdiagnosisamachinelearningapproach
AT nicolomassimo combiningmaculaclinicalsignsandpatientcharacteristicsforagerelatedmaculardegenerationdiagnosisamachinelearningapproach
AT bonettomonica combiningmaculaclinicalsignsandpatientcharacteristicsforagerelatedmaculardegenerationdiagnosisamachinelearningapproach
AT giacominimauro combiningmaculaclinicalsignsandpatientcharacteristicsforagerelatedmaculardegenerationdiagnosisamachinelearningapproach
AT wellerpeter combiningmaculaclinicalsignsandpatientcharacteristicsforagerelatedmaculardegenerationdiagnosisamachinelearningapproach
AT traversocarloenrico combiningmaculaclinicalsignsandpatientcharacteristicsforagerelatedmaculardegenerationdiagnosisamachinelearningapproach
AT prosperimattia combiningmaculaclinicalsignsandpatientcharacteristicsforagerelatedmaculardegenerationdiagnosisamachinelearningapproach
AT osullivandympna combiningmaculaclinicalsignsandpatientcharacteristicsforagerelatedmaculardegenerationdiagnosisamachinelearningapproach