Cargando…
A case–control observational study of insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome among the four phenotypes of polycystic ovary syndrome based on Rotterdam criteria
BACKGROUND: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is associated with an increased risk of insulin resistance (IR), metabolic syndrome (MetS), impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Metabolic aspects of the four PCOS phenotypes remain to be fully defined. The aim of this stu...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4417246/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25595199 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-4755-12-7 |
_version_ | 1782369339737899008 |
---|---|
author | Jamil, Avin S Alalaf, Shahla K Al-Tawil, Namir G Al-Shawaf, Talha |
author_facet | Jamil, Avin S Alalaf, Shahla K Al-Tawil, Namir G Al-Shawaf, Talha |
author_sort | Jamil, Avin S |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is associated with an increased risk of insulin resistance (IR), metabolic syndrome (MetS), impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Metabolic aspects of the four PCOS phenotypes remain to be fully defined. The aim of this study was to compare metabolic parameters and insulin resistance among the four PCOS phenotypes defined according to the Rotterdam criteria and to determine predictors of these complications. METHODS: A total of 526 reproductive-aged women were included in this observational case–control study. Of these, 263 were diagnosed as a PCOS based on Rotterdam criteria and 263 infertile women with no evidence of PCOS were recruited as controls. Biochemical, metabolic and insulin resistance parameters were compared in the two groups and the frequency of MetS and IR were compared among the four phenotypes. Data were analyzed for statistical significance using Student’s t-test and one way analysis of variance followed by a post-hoc test (least significant difference). Chi-square tests were used to compare proportions. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were also applied. RESULTS: IR was identified in 112 (42.6%) of the PCOS women and 45 (17.1%) of the control (P <0.001). There were no significant differences in the frequency of IR and MetS between the four PCOS phenotypes. Homeostatic model assessment for IR (HOMA-IR) ≥3.8 was the most common IR parameter in PCOS and control groups. Women with oligo-anovulation (O) and PCO morphology (P) had a significantly lower level of 2-h postprandial insulin compared to women with O, P and hyperandrogenism (H) phenotypes. Logistic regression analysis showed that body mass index, waist circumference, triglyceride/high-density lipoprotein ratio (cardiovascular risk), HOMA-IR and glucose abnormalities (T2DM) were associated with increased risk of having MetS (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: PCOS women with (O + P) show milder endocrine and metabolic abnormalities. Although, there were no significant differences in IR, MetS and glucose intolerance between the four PCOS phenotypes, women with PCOS are at higher risk of impaired glucose tolerance and undiagnosed diabetes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4417246 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44172462015-05-03 A case–control observational study of insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome among the four phenotypes of polycystic ovary syndrome based on Rotterdam criteria Jamil, Avin S Alalaf, Shahla K Al-Tawil, Namir G Al-Shawaf, Talha Reprod Health Research BACKGROUND: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is associated with an increased risk of insulin resistance (IR), metabolic syndrome (MetS), impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Metabolic aspects of the four PCOS phenotypes remain to be fully defined. The aim of this study was to compare metabolic parameters and insulin resistance among the four PCOS phenotypes defined according to the Rotterdam criteria and to determine predictors of these complications. METHODS: A total of 526 reproductive-aged women were included in this observational case–control study. Of these, 263 were diagnosed as a PCOS based on Rotterdam criteria and 263 infertile women with no evidence of PCOS were recruited as controls. Biochemical, metabolic and insulin resistance parameters were compared in the two groups and the frequency of MetS and IR were compared among the four phenotypes. Data were analyzed for statistical significance using Student’s t-test and one way analysis of variance followed by a post-hoc test (least significant difference). Chi-square tests were used to compare proportions. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were also applied. RESULTS: IR was identified in 112 (42.6%) of the PCOS women and 45 (17.1%) of the control (P <0.001). There were no significant differences in the frequency of IR and MetS between the four PCOS phenotypes. Homeostatic model assessment for IR (HOMA-IR) ≥3.8 was the most common IR parameter in PCOS and control groups. Women with oligo-anovulation (O) and PCO morphology (P) had a significantly lower level of 2-h postprandial insulin compared to women with O, P and hyperandrogenism (H) phenotypes. Logistic regression analysis showed that body mass index, waist circumference, triglyceride/high-density lipoprotein ratio (cardiovascular risk), HOMA-IR and glucose abnormalities (T2DM) were associated with increased risk of having MetS (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: PCOS women with (O + P) show milder endocrine and metabolic abnormalities. Although, there were no significant differences in IR, MetS and glucose intolerance between the four PCOS phenotypes, women with PCOS are at higher risk of impaired glucose tolerance and undiagnosed diabetes. BioMed Central 2015-01-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4417246/ /pubmed/25595199 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-4755-12-7 Text en © Jamil et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Jamil, Avin S Alalaf, Shahla K Al-Tawil, Namir G Al-Shawaf, Talha A case–control observational study of insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome among the four phenotypes of polycystic ovary syndrome based on Rotterdam criteria |
title | A case–control observational study of insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome among the four phenotypes of polycystic ovary syndrome based on Rotterdam criteria |
title_full | A case–control observational study of insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome among the four phenotypes of polycystic ovary syndrome based on Rotterdam criteria |
title_fullStr | A case–control observational study of insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome among the four phenotypes of polycystic ovary syndrome based on Rotterdam criteria |
title_full_unstemmed | A case–control observational study of insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome among the four phenotypes of polycystic ovary syndrome based on Rotterdam criteria |
title_short | A case–control observational study of insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome among the four phenotypes of polycystic ovary syndrome based on Rotterdam criteria |
title_sort | case–control observational study of insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome among the four phenotypes of polycystic ovary syndrome based on rotterdam criteria |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4417246/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25595199 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-4755-12-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jamilavins acasecontrolobservationalstudyofinsulinresistanceandmetabolicsyndromeamongthefourphenotypesofpolycysticovarysyndromebasedonrotterdamcriteria AT alalafshahlak acasecontrolobservationalstudyofinsulinresistanceandmetabolicsyndromeamongthefourphenotypesofpolycysticovarysyndromebasedonrotterdamcriteria AT altawilnamirg acasecontrolobservationalstudyofinsulinresistanceandmetabolicsyndromeamongthefourphenotypesofpolycysticovarysyndromebasedonrotterdamcriteria AT alshawaftalha acasecontrolobservationalstudyofinsulinresistanceandmetabolicsyndromeamongthefourphenotypesofpolycysticovarysyndromebasedonrotterdamcriteria AT jamilavins casecontrolobservationalstudyofinsulinresistanceandmetabolicsyndromeamongthefourphenotypesofpolycysticovarysyndromebasedonrotterdamcriteria AT alalafshahlak casecontrolobservationalstudyofinsulinresistanceandmetabolicsyndromeamongthefourphenotypesofpolycysticovarysyndromebasedonrotterdamcriteria AT altawilnamirg casecontrolobservationalstudyofinsulinresistanceandmetabolicsyndromeamongthefourphenotypesofpolycysticovarysyndromebasedonrotterdamcriteria AT alshawaftalha casecontrolobservationalstudyofinsulinresistanceandmetabolicsyndromeamongthefourphenotypesofpolycysticovarysyndromebasedonrotterdamcriteria |