Cargando…

Different roles of electromagnetic field experts when giving policy advice: an expert consultation

BACKGROUND: The overall evidence for adverse health effects of electromagnetic fields (EMF) at levels of exposure normally experienced by the public is generally considered weak. However, whether long-term health effects arise remains uncertain and scientific policy advice is therefore given against...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Spruijt, Pita, Knol, Anne B, Petersen, Arthur C, Lebret, Erik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4417251/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25604825
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-14-7
_version_ 1782369340902866944
author Spruijt, Pita
Knol, Anne B
Petersen, Arthur C
Lebret, Erik
author_facet Spruijt, Pita
Knol, Anne B
Petersen, Arthur C
Lebret, Erik
author_sort Spruijt, Pita
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The overall evidence for adverse health effects of electromagnetic fields (EMF) at levels of exposure normally experienced by the public is generally considered weak. However, whether long-term health effects arise remains uncertain and scientific policy advice is therefore given against a background of uncertainty. Several theories exist about different roles that experts may take when they provide advice on complex issues such as EMF. To provide empirical evidence for these theories, we conducted an expert consultation with as main research question: What are the different roles of EMF experts when they provide policy advice? METHODS: Q methodology was used to empirically test theoretical notions on the existence and determinants of different expert roles and to analyze which roles actually play out in the domain of EMF. Experts were selected based on a structured nominee process. In total 32 international EMF experts participated. Responses were analyzed using Principal Component Analysis and for the open questions we used Atlas.ti. RESULTS: Four expert roles were found. Most striking differences between the four roles are whether experts consider current EMF policies adequate or not, whether additional –precautionary– measures are needed, and how experts view their position vis-à-vis policymakers and/or other stakeholders. CONCLUSION: This empirical study provides support for the so far mainly theoretical debate about the existence of different roles of experts when they give policy advice. The experts’ assessment of the degree of uncertainty of the issue turned out to be highly associated with their role. We argue that part of the controversy that exists in the debate regarding scientific policy advice on EMF is about different values and roles. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1476-069X-14-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4417251
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44172512015-05-03 Different roles of electromagnetic field experts when giving policy advice: an expert consultation Spruijt, Pita Knol, Anne B Petersen, Arthur C Lebret, Erik Environ Health Research BACKGROUND: The overall evidence for adverse health effects of electromagnetic fields (EMF) at levels of exposure normally experienced by the public is generally considered weak. However, whether long-term health effects arise remains uncertain and scientific policy advice is therefore given against a background of uncertainty. Several theories exist about different roles that experts may take when they provide advice on complex issues such as EMF. To provide empirical evidence for these theories, we conducted an expert consultation with as main research question: What are the different roles of EMF experts when they provide policy advice? METHODS: Q methodology was used to empirically test theoretical notions on the existence and determinants of different expert roles and to analyze which roles actually play out in the domain of EMF. Experts were selected based on a structured nominee process. In total 32 international EMF experts participated. Responses were analyzed using Principal Component Analysis and for the open questions we used Atlas.ti. RESULTS: Four expert roles were found. Most striking differences between the four roles are whether experts consider current EMF policies adequate or not, whether additional –precautionary– measures are needed, and how experts view their position vis-à-vis policymakers and/or other stakeholders. CONCLUSION: This empirical study provides support for the so far mainly theoretical debate about the existence of different roles of experts when they give policy advice. The experts’ assessment of the degree of uncertainty of the issue turned out to be highly associated with their role. We argue that part of the controversy that exists in the debate regarding scientific policy advice on EMF is about different values and roles. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1476-069X-14-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4417251/ /pubmed/25604825 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-14-7 Text en © Spruijt et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Spruijt, Pita
Knol, Anne B
Petersen, Arthur C
Lebret, Erik
Different roles of electromagnetic field experts when giving policy advice: an expert consultation
title Different roles of electromagnetic field experts when giving policy advice: an expert consultation
title_full Different roles of electromagnetic field experts when giving policy advice: an expert consultation
title_fullStr Different roles of electromagnetic field experts when giving policy advice: an expert consultation
title_full_unstemmed Different roles of electromagnetic field experts when giving policy advice: an expert consultation
title_short Different roles of electromagnetic field experts when giving policy advice: an expert consultation
title_sort different roles of electromagnetic field experts when giving policy advice: an expert consultation
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4417251/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25604825
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-14-7
work_keys_str_mv AT spruijtpita differentrolesofelectromagneticfieldexpertswhengivingpolicyadviceanexpertconsultation
AT knolanneb differentrolesofelectromagneticfieldexpertswhengivingpolicyadviceanexpertconsultation
AT petersenarthurc differentrolesofelectromagneticfieldexpertswhengivingpolicyadviceanexpertconsultation
AT lebreterik differentrolesofelectromagneticfieldexpertswhengivingpolicyadviceanexpertconsultation