Cargando…

Making species checklists understandable to machines – a shift from relational databases to ontologies

BACKGROUND: The scientific names of plants and animals play a major role in Life Sciences as information is indexed, integrated, and searched using scientific names. The main problem with names is their ambiguous nature, because more than one name may point to the same taxon and multiple taxa may sh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Laurenne, Nina, Tuominen, Jouni, Saarenmaa, Hannu, Hyvönen, Eero
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4417522/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25937880
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2041-1480-5-40
_version_ 1782369370390921216
author Laurenne, Nina
Tuominen, Jouni
Saarenmaa, Hannu
Hyvönen, Eero
author_facet Laurenne, Nina
Tuominen, Jouni
Saarenmaa, Hannu
Hyvönen, Eero
author_sort Laurenne, Nina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The scientific names of plants and animals play a major role in Life Sciences as information is indexed, integrated, and searched using scientific names. The main problem with names is their ambiguous nature, because more than one name may point to the same taxon and multiple taxa may share the same name. In addition, scientific names change over time, which makes them open to various interpretations. Applying machine-understandable semantics to these names enables efficient processing of biological content in information systems. The first step is to use unique persistent identifiers instead of name strings when referring to taxa. The most commonly used identifiers are Life Science Identifiers (LSID), which are traditionally used in relational databases, and more recently HTTP URIs, which are applied on the Semantic Web by Linked Data applications. RESULTS: We introduce two models for expressing taxonomic information in the form of species checklists. First, we show how species checklists are presented in a relational database system using LSIDs. Then, in order to gain a more detailed representation of taxonomic information, we introduce meta-ontology TaxMeOn to model the same content as Semantic Web ontologies where taxa are identified using HTTP URIs. We also explore how changes in scientific names can be managed over time. CONCLUSIONS: The use of HTTP URIs is preferable for presenting the taxonomic information of species checklists. An HTTP URI identifies a taxon and operates as a web address from which additional information about the taxon can be located, unlike LSID. This enables the integration of biological data from different sources on the web using Linked Data principles and prevents the formation of information silos. The Linked Data approach allows a user to assemble information and evaluate the complexity of taxonomical data based on conflicting views of taxonomic classifications. Using HTTP URIs and Semantic Web technologies also facilitate the representation of the semantics of biological data, and in this way, the creation of more “intelligent” biological applications and services. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/2041-1480-5-40) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4417522
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44175222015-05-04 Making species checklists understandable to machines – a shift from relational databases to ontologies Laurenne, Nina Tuominen, Jouni Saarenmaa, Hannu Hyvönen, Eero J Biomed Semantics Research BACKGROUND: The scientific names of plants and animals play a major role in Life Sciences as information is indexed, integrated, and searched using scientific names. The main problem with names is their ambiguous nature, because more than one name may point to the same taxon and multiple taxa may share the same name. In addition, scientific names change over time, which makes them open to various interpretations. Applying machine-understandable semantics to these names enables efficient processing of biological content in information systems. The first step is to use unique persistent identifiers instead of name strings when referring to taxa. The most commonly used identifiers are Life Science Identifiers (LSID), which are traditionally used in relational databases, and more recently HTTP URIs, which are applied on the Semantic Web by Linked Data applications. RESULTS: We introduce two models for expressing taxonomic information in the form of species checklists. First, we show how species checklists are presented in a relational database system using LSIDs. Then, in order to gain a more detailed representation of taxonomic information, we introduce meta-ontology TaxMeOn to model the same content as Semantic Web ontologies where taxa are identified using HTTP URIs. We also explore how changes in scientific names can be managed over time. CONCLUSIONS: The use of HTTP URIs is preferable for presenting the taxonomic information of species checklists. An HTTP URI identifies a taxon and operates as a web address from which additional information about the taxon can be located, unlike LSID. This enables the integration of biological data from different sources on the web using Linked Data principles and prevents the formation of information silos. The Linked Data approach allows a user to assemble information and evaluate the complexity of taxonomical data based on conflicting views of taxonomic classifications. Using HTTP URIs and Semantic Web technologies also facilitate the representation of the semantics of biological data, and in this way, the creation of more “intelligent” biological applications and services. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/2041-1480-5-40) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4417522/ /pubmed/25937880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2041-1480-5-40 Text en © Laurenne et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Laurenne, Nina
Tuominen, Jouni
Saarenmaa, Hannu
Hyvönen, Eero
Making species checklists understandable to machines – a shift from relational databases to ontologies
title Making species checklists understandable to machines – a shift from relational databases to ontologies
title_full Making species checklists understandable to machines – a shift from relational databases to ontologies
title_fullStr Making species checklists understandable to machines – a shift from relational databases to ontologies
title_full_unstemmed Making species checklists understandable to machines – a shift from relational databases to ontologies
title_short Making species checklists understandable to machines – a shift from relational databases to ontologies
title_sort making species checklists understandable to machines – a shift from relational databases to ontologies
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4417522/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25937880
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2041-1480-5-40
work_keys_str_mv AT laurennenina makingspecieschecklistsunderstandabletomachinesashiftfromrelationaldatabasestoontologies
AT tuominenjouni makingspecieschecklistsunderstandabletomachinesashiftfromrelationaldatabasestoontologies
AT saarenmaahannu makingspecieschecklistsunderstandabletomachinesashiftfromrelationaldatabasestoontologies
AT hyvoneneero makingspecieschecklistsunderstandabletomachinesashiftfromrelationaldatabasestoontologies