Cargando…

Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome (PRES): Restricted Diffusion does not Necessarily Mean Irreversibility

BACKGROUND: Restricted diffusion is the second most common atypical presentation of PRES. This has a very important implication, as lesions with cytotoxic edema may progress to infarction. Several studies suggested the role of DWI in the prediction of development of infarctions in these cases. Other...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wagih, Alaa, Mohsen, Laila, Rayan, Moustafa M., Hasan, Mo’men M., Al-Sherif, Ashraf H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4418207/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25960819
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/PJR.893460
_version_ 1782369449137930240
author Wagih, Alaa
Mohsen, Laila
Rayan, Moustafa M.
Hasan, Mo’men M.
Al-Sherif, Ashraf H.
author_facet Wagih, Alaa
Mohsen, Laila
Rayan, Moustafa M.
Hasan, Mo’men M.
Al-Sherif, Ashraf H.
author_sort Wagih, Alaa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Restricted diffusion is the second most common atypical presentation of PRES. This has a very important implication, as lesions with cytotoxic edema may progress to infarction. Several studies suggested the role of DWI in the prediction of development of infarctions in these cases. Other studies, however, suggested that PRES is reversible even with cytotoxic patterns. Our aim was to evaluate whether every restricted diffusion in PRES is reversible and what factors affect this reversibility. MATERIAL/METHODS: Thirty-six patients with acute neurological symptoms suggestive of PRES were included in our study. Inclusion criteria comprised imaging features of atypical PRES where DWI images and ADC maps show restricted diffusion. Patients were imaged with 0.2-T and 1.5-T machines. FLAIR images were evaluated for the severity of the disease and a FLAIR/DWI score was used. ADC values were selectively recorded from the areas of diffusion restriction. A follow-up MRI study was carried out in all patients after 2 weeks. Patients were classified according to reversibility into: Group 1 (reversible PRES; 32 patients) and Group 2 (irreversible changes; 4 patients). The study was approved by the University’s research ethics committee, which conforms to the declaration of Helsinki. RESULTS: The age and blood pressure did not vary significantly between both groups. The total number of regions involved and the FLAIR/DWI score did not vary significantly between both groups. Individual regions did not reveal any tendency for the development of irreversible lesions. Similarly, ADC values did not reveal any significant difference between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: PRES is completely reversible in the majority of patients, even with restricted diffusion. None of the variables under study could predict the reversibility of PRES lesions. It seems that this process is individual-dependent.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4418207
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher International Scientific Literature, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44182072015-05-08 Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome (PRES): Restricted Diffusion does not Necessarily Mean Irreversibility Wagih, Alaa Mohsen, Laila Rayan, Moustafa M. Hasan, Mo’men M. Al-Sherif, Ashraf H. Pol J Radiol Original Article BACKGROUND: Restricted diffusion is the second most common atypical presentation of PRES. This has a very important implication, as lesions with cytotoxic edema may progress to infarction. Several studies suggested the role of DWI in the prediction of development of infarctions in these cases. Other studies, however, suggested that PRES is reversible even with cytotoxic patterns. Our aim was to evaluate whether every restricted diffusion in PRES is reversible and what factors affect this reversibility. MATERIAL/METHODS: Thirty-six patients with acute neurological symptoms suggestive of PRES were included in our study. Inclusion criteria comprised imaging features of atypical PRES where DWI images and ADC maps show restricted diffusion. Patients were imaged with 0.2-T and 1.5-T machines. FLAIR images were evaluated for the severity of the disease and a FLAIR/DWI score was used. ADC values were selectively recorded from the areas of diffusion restriction. A follow-up MRI study was carried out in all patients after 2 weeks. Patients were classified according to reversibility into: Group 1 (reversible PRES; 32 patients) and Group 2 (irreversible changes; 4 patients). The study was approved by the University’s research ethics committee, which conforms to the declaration of Helsinki. RESULTS: The age and blood pressure did not vary significantly between both groups. The total number of regions involved and the FLAIR/DWI score did not vary significantly between both groups. Individual regions did not reveal any tendency for the development of irreversible lesions. Similarly, ADC values did not reveal any significant difference between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: PRES is completely reversible in the majority of patients, even with restricted diffusion. None of the variables under study could predict the reversibility of PRES lesions. It seems that this process is individual-dependent. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2015-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4418207/ /pubmed/25960819 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/PJR.893460 Text en © Pol J Radiol, 2015 This is an open access article. Unrestricted non-commercial use is permitted provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Wagih, Alaa
Mohsen, Laila
Rayan, Moustafa M.
Hasan, Mo’men M.
Al-Sherif, Ashraf H.
Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome (PRES): Restricted Diffusion does not Necessarily Mean Irreversibility
title Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome (PRES): Restricted Diffusion does not Necessarily Mean Irreversibility
title_full Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome (PRES): Restricted Diffusion does not Necessarily Mean Irreversibility
title_fullStr Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome (PRES): Restricted Diffusion does not Necessarily Mean Irreversibility
title_full_unstemmed Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome (PRES): Restricted Diffusion does not Necessarily Mean Irreversibility
title_short Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome (PRES): Restricted Diffusion does not Necessarily Mean Irreversibility
title_sort posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (pres): restricted diffusion does not necessarily mean irreversibility
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4418207/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25960819
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/PJR.893460
work_keys_str_mv AT wagihalaa posteriorreversibleencephalopathysyndromepresrestricteddiffusiondoesnotnecessarilymeanirreversibility
AT mohsenlaila posteriorreversibleencephalopathysyndromepresrestricteddiffusiondoesnotnecessarilymeanirreversibility
AT rayanmoustafam posteriorreversibleencephalopathysyndromepresrestricteddiffusiondoesnotnecessarilymeanirreversibility
AT hasanmomenm posteriorreversibleencephalopathysyndromepresrestricteddiffusiondoesnotnecessarilymeanirreversibility
AT alsherifashrafh posteriorreversibleencephalopathysyndromepresrestricteddiffusiondoesnotnecessarilymeanirreversibility