Cargando…

Biomaterials for Pelvic Floor Reconstructive Surgery: How Can We Do Better?

Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) are major health issues that detrimentally impact the quality of life of millions of women worldwide. Surgical repair is an effective and durable treatment for both conditions. Over the past two decades there has been a trend to enfor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gigliobianco, Giulia, Roman Regueros, Sabiniano, Osman, Nadir I., Bissoli, Julio, Bullock, Anthony J., Chapple, Chris R., MacNeil, Sheila
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4419215/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25977927
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/968087
_version_ 1782369542764232704
author Gigliobianco, Giulia
Roman Regueros, Sabiniano
Osman, Nadir I.
Bissoli, Julio
Bullock, Anthony J.
Chapple, Chris R.
MacNeil, Sheila
author_facet Gigliobianco, Giulia
Roman Regueros, Sabiniano
Osman, Nadir I.
Bissoli, Julio
Bullock, Anthony J.
Chapple, Chris R.
MacNeil, Sheila
author_sort Gigliobianco, Giulia
collection PubMed
description Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) are major health issues that detrimentally impact the quality of life of millions of women worldwide. Surgical repair is an effective and durable treatment for both conditions. Over the past two decades there has been a trend to enforce or reinforce repairs with synthetic and biological materials. The determinants of surgical outcome are many, encompassing the physical and mechanical properties of the material used, and individual immune responses, as well surgical and constitutional factors. Of the current biomaterials in use none represents an ideal. Biomaterials that induce limited inflammatory response followed by constructive remodelling appear to have more long term success than biomaterials that induce chronic inflammation, fibrosis and encapsulation. In this review we draw upon published animal and human studies to characterize the changes biomaterials undergo after implantation and the typical host responses, placing these in the context of clinical outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4419215
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44192152015-05-14 Biomaterials for Pelvic Floor Reconstructive Surgery: How Can We Do Better? Gigliobianco, Giulia Roman Regueros, Sabiniano Osman, Nadir I. Bissoli, Julio Bullock, Anthony J. Chapple, Chris R. MacNeil, Sheila Biomed Res Int Review Article Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) are major health issues that detrimentally impact the quality of life of millions of women worldwide. Surgical repair is an effective and durable treatment for both conditions. Over the past two decades there has been a trend to enforce or reinforce repairs with synthetic and biological materials. The determinants of surgical outcome are many, encompassing the physical and mechanical properties of the material used, and individual immune responses, as well surgical and constitutional factors. Of the current biomaterials in use none represents an ideal. Biomaterials that induce limited inflammatory response followed by constructive remodelling appear to have more long term success than biomaterials that induce chronic inflammation, fibrosis and encapsulation. In this review we draw upon published animal and human studies to characterize the changes biomaterials undergo after implantation and the typical host responses, placing these in the context of clinical outcomes. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4419215/ /pubmed/25977927 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/968087 Text en Copyright © 2015 Giulia Gigliobianco et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Gigliobianco, Giulia
Roman Regueros, Sabiniano
Osman, Nadir I.
Bissoli, Julio
Bullock, Anthony J.
Chapple, Chris R.
MacNeil, Sheila
Biomaterials for Pelvic Floor Reconstructive Surgery: How Can We Do Better?
title Biomaterials for Pelvic Floor Reconstructive Surgery: How Can We Do Better?
title_full Biomaterials for Pelvic Floor Reconstructive Surgery: How Can We Do Better?
title_fullStr Biomaterials for Pelvic Floor Reconstructive Surgery: How Can We Do Better?
title_full_unstemmed Biomaterials for Pelvic Floor Reconstructive Surgery: How Can We Do Better?
title_short Biomaterials for Pelvic Floor Reconstructive Surgery: How Can We Do Better?
title_sort biomaterials for pelvic floor reconstructive surgery: how can we do better?
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4419215/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25977927
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/968087
work_keys_str_mv AT gigliobiancogiulia biomaterialsforpelvicfloorreconstructivesurgeryhowcanwedobetter
AT romanreguerossabiniano biomaterialsforpelvicfloorreconstructivesurgeryhowcanwedobetter
AT osmannadiri biomaterialsforpelvicfloorreconstructivesurgeryhowcanwedobetter
AT bissolijulio biomaterialsforpelvicfloorreconstructivesurgeryhowcanwedobetter
AT bullockanthonyj biomaterialsforpelvicfloorreconstructivesurgeryhowcanwedobetter
AT chapplechrisr biomaterialsforpelvicfloorreconstructivesurgeryhowcanwedobetter
AT macneilsheila biomaterialsforpelvicfloorreconstructivesurgeryhowcanwedobetter