Cargando…
Biomaterials for Pelvic Floor Reconstructive Surgery: How Can We Do Better?
Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) are major health issues that detrimentally impact the quality of life of millions of women worldwide. Surgical repair is an effective and durable treatment for both conditions. Over the past two decades there has been a trend to enfor...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4419215/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25977927 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/968087 |
_version_ | 1782369542764232704 |
---|---|
author | Gigliobianco, Giulia Roman Regueros, Sabiniano Osman, Nadir I. Bissoli, Julio Bullock, Anthony J. Chapple, Chris R. MacNeil, Sheila |
author_facet | Gigliobianco, Giulia Roman Regueros, Sabiniano Osman, Nadir I. Bissoli, Julio Bullock, Anthony J. Chapple, Chris R. MacNeil, Sheila |
author_sort | Gigliobianco, Giulia |
collection | PubMed |
description | Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) are major health issues that detrimentally impact the quality of life of millions of women worldwide. Surgical repair is an effective and durable treatment for both conditions. Over the past two decades there has been a trend to enforce or reinforce repairs with synthetic and biological materials. The determinants of surgical outcome are many, encompassing the physical and mechanical properties of the material used, and individual immune responses, as well surgical and constitutional factors. Of the current biomaterials in use none represents an ideal. Biomaterials that induce limited inflammatory response followed by constructive remodelling appear to have more long term success than biomaterials that induce chronic inflammation, fibrosis and encapsulation. In this review we draw upon published animal and human studies to characterize the changes biomaterials undergo after implantation and the typical host responses, placing these in the context of clinical outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4419215 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44192152015-05-14 Biomaterials for Pelvic Floor Reconstructive Surgery: How Can We Do Better? Gigliobianco, Giulia Roman Regueros, Sabiniano Osman, Nadir I. Bissoli, Julio Bullock, Anthony J. Chapple, Chris R. MacNeil, Sheila Biomed Res Int Review Article Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) are major health issues that detrimentally impact the quality of life of millions of women worldwide. Surgical repair is an effective and durable treatment for both conditions. Over the past two decades there has been a trend to enforce or reinforce repairs with synthetic and biological materials. The determinants of surgical outcome are many, encompassing the physical and mechanical properties of the material used, and individual immune responses, as well surgical and constitutional factors. Of the current biomaterials in use none represents an ideal. Biomaterials that induce limited inflammatory response followed by constructive remodelling appear to have more long term success than biomaterials that induce chronic inflammation, fibrosis and encapsulation. In this review we draw upon published animal and human studies to characterize the changes biomaterials undergo after implantation and the typical host responses, placing these in the context of clinical outcomes. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4419215/ /pubmed/25977927 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/968087 Text en Copyright © 2015 Giulia Gigliobianco et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Gigliobianco, Giulia Roman Regueros, Sabiniano Osman, Nadir I. Bissoli, Julio Bullock, Anthony J. Chapple, Chris R. MacNeil, Sheila Biomaterials for Pelvic Floor Reconstructive Surgery: How Can We Do Better? |
title | Biomaterials for Pelvic Floor Reconstructive Surgery: How Can We Do Better? |
title_full | Biomaterials for Pelvic Floor Reconstructive Surgery: How Can We Do Better? |
title_fullStr | Biomaterials for Pelvic Floor Reconstructive Surgery: How Can We Do Better? |
title_full_unstemmed | Biomaterials for Pelvic Floor Reconstructive Surgery: How Can We Do Better? |
title_short | Biomaterials for Pelvic Floor Reconstructive Surgery: How Can We Do Better? |
title_sort | biomaterials for pelvic floor reconstructive surgery: how can we do better? |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4419215/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25977927 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/968087 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gigliobiancogiulia biomaterialsforpelvicfloorreconstructivesurgeryhowcanwedobetter AT romanreguerossabiniano biomaterialsforpelvicfloorreconstructivesurgeryhowcanwedobetter AT osmannadiri biomaterialsforpelvicfloorreconstructivesurgeryhowcanwedobetter AT bissolijulio biomaterialsforpelvicfloorreconstructivesurgeryhowcanwedobetter AT bullockanthonyj biomaterialsforpelvicfloorreconstructivesurgeryhowcanwedobetter AT chapplechrisr biomaterialsforpelvicfloorreconstructivesurgeryhowcanwedobetter AT macneilsheila biomaterialsforpelvicfloorreconstructivesurgeryhowcanwedobetter |