Cargando…

Feasibility and Safety of Overtubes for PEG-Tube Placement in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer

Background. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) placement using the “pull” technique is commonly utilized for providing nutritional support in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients, but it may be complicated by peristomal metastasis in up to 3% of patients. Overtube-assisted PEG placement might...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Musumba, Crispin O., Hsu, Julia, Ahlenstiel, Golo, Tutticci, Nicholas J., Nanda, Kavinderjit S., van der Poorten, David, Lee, Eric Y., Kwan, Vu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4419231/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25977688
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/612610
_version_ 1782369546526523392
author Musumba, Crispin O.
Hsu, Julia
Ahlenstiel, Golo
Tutticci, Nicholas J.
Nanda, Kavinderjit S.
van der Poorten, David
Lee, Eric Y.
Kwan, Vu
author_facet Musumba, Crispin O.
Hsu, Julia
Ahlenstiel, Golo
Tutticci, Nicholas J.
Nanda, Kavinderjit S.
van der Poorten, David
Lee, Eric Y.
Kwan, Vu
author_sort Musumba, Crispin O.
collection PubMed
description Background. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) placement using the “pull” technique is commonly utilized for providing nutritional support in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients, but it may be complicated by peristomal metastasis in up to 3% of patients. Overtube-assisted PEG placement might reduce this risk. However, this technique has not been systemically studied for this purpose to date. Methods. Retrospective analysis of consecutive patients with HNC who underwent overtube-assisted PEG placement at Westmead Hospital, Australia, between June 2011 and December 2013. Data were extracted from patients' endoscopy reports and case notes. We present our technique for PEG insertion and discuss the feasibility and safety of this method. Results. In all 53 patients studied, the PEG tubes were successfully placed using 25 cm long flexible overtubes, in 89% prophylactically (before commencing curative chemoradiotherapy), and in 11% reactively (for treatment of tumor related dysphagia or weight loss). During a median follow-up period of 16 months, 3 (5.7%) patients developed peristomal infection and 3 others developed self-limiting peristomal pain. There were no cases of overtube-related adverse events or overt cutaneous metastases observed. Conclusions. Overtube-assisted PEG placement in patients with HNC is a feasible, simple, and safe technique and might be effective for preventing cutaneous metastasis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4419231
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44192312015-05-14 Feasibility and Safety of Overtubes for PEG-Tube Placement in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer Musumba, Crispin O. Hsu, Julia Ahlenstiel, Golo Tutticci, Nicholas J. Nanda, Kavinderjit S. van der Poorten, David Lee, Eric Y. Kwan, Vu Gastroenterol Res Pract Research Article Background. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) placement using the “pull” technique is commonly utilized for providing nutritional support in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients, but it may be complicated by peristomal metastasis in up to 3% of patients. Overtube-assisted PEG placement might reduce this risk. However, this technique has not been systemically studied for this purpose to date. Methods. Retrospective analysis of consecutive patients with HNC who underwent overtube-assisted PEG placement at Westmead Hospital, Australia, between June 2011 and December 2013. Data were extracted from patients' endoscopy reports and case notes. We present our technique for PEG insertion and discuss the feasibility and safety of this method. Results. In all 53 patients studied, the PEG tubes were successfully placed using 25 cm long flexible overtubes, in 89% prophylactically (before commencing curative chemoradiotherapy), and in 11% reactively (for treatment of tumor related dysphagia or weight loss). During a median follow-up period of 16 months, 3 (5.7%) patients developed peristomal infection and 3 others developed self-limiting peristomal pain. There were no cases of overtube-related adverse events or overt cutaneous metastases observed. Conclusions. Overtube-assisted PEG placement in patients with HNC is a feasible, simple, and safe technique and might be effective for preventing cutaneous metastasis. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4419231/ /pubmed/25977688 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/612610 Text en Copyright © 2015 Crispin O. Musumba et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Musumba, Crispin O.
Hsu, Julia
Ahlenstiel, Golo
Tutticci, Nicholas J.
Nanda, Kavinderjit S.
van der Poorten, David
Lee, Eric Y.
Kwan, Vu
Feasibility and Safety of Overtubes for PEG-Tube Placement in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer
title Feasibility and Safety of Overtubes for PEG-Tube Placement in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer
title_full Feasibility and Safety of Overtubes for PEG-Tube Placement in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer
title_fullStr Feasibility and Safety of Overtubes for PEG-Tube Placement in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility and Safety of Overtubes for PEG-Tube Placement in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer
title_short Feasibility and Safety of Overtubes for PEG-Tube Placement in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer
title_sort feasibility and safety of overtubes for peg-tube placement in patients with head and neck cancer
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4419231/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25977688
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/612610
work_keys_str_mv AT musumbacrispino feasibilityandsafetyofovertubesforpegtubeplacementinpatientswithheadandneckcancer
AT hsujulia feasibilityandsafetyofovertubesforpegtubeplacementinpatientswithheadandneckcancer
AT ahlenstielgolo feasibilityandsafetyofovertubesforpegtubeplacementinpatientswithheadandneckcancer
AT tutticcinicholasj feasibilityandsafetyofovertubesforpegtubeplacementinpatientswithheadandneckcancer
AT nandakavinderjits feasibilityandsafetyofovertubesforpegtubeplacementinpatientswithheadandneckcancer
AT vanderpoortendavid feasibilityandsafetyofovertubesforpegtubeplacementinpatientswithheadandneckcancer
AT leeericy feasibilityandsafetyofovertubesforpegtubeplacementinpatientswithheadandneckcancer
AT kwanvu feasibilityandsafetyofovertubesforpegtubeplacementinpatientswithheadandneckcancer