Cargando…

No longer ‘flying blind’: how access has changed emergency mental health care in rural and remote emergency departments, a qualitative study

BACKGROUND: Mental health presentations are considered to be a difficult aspect of emergency care. Although emergency department (ED) staff is qualified to provide emergency mental health care, for some, such presentations pose a challenge to their training, confidence, and time. Providing access to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saurman, Emily, Kirby, Sue E, Lyle, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4419396/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25889260
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-0839-7
_version_ 1782369563567980544
author Saurman, Emily
Kirby, Sue E
Lyle, David
author_facet Saurman, Emily
Kirby, Sue E
Lyle, David
author_sort Saurman, Emily
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Mental health presentations are considered to be a difficult aspect of emergency care. Although emergency department (ED) staff is qualified to provide emergency mental health care, for some, such presentations pose a challenge to their training, confidence, and time. Providing access to relevant and responsive specialist mental health care can influence care and management for these patients. The Mental Health Emergency Care-Rural Access Program (MHEC-RAP) is a telepsychiatry program that was established to improve access to specialist emergency mental health care across rural and remote western NSW, Australia. METHOD: This study uses interviews with ED providers to understand their experience of managing emergency mental health patients and their use of MHEC-RAP. The lens of access was applied to assess program impact and inform continuing program development. RESULTS: With MHEC-RAP, these ED providers are no longer ‘flying blind’. They are also more confident to manage and care for emergency mental health patients locally. For these providers, access to specialists who are able to conduct assessments and provide relevant and responsive advice for emergency mental health presentations was valued. Assessing the fit between the consumer and service as a requirement for the development, evaluation, and ongoing management of the service should result in decisions about design and delivery that achieve improved access to care and meet the needs of their consumers. The experience of these providers prior to MHEC-RAP is consistent with that reported in other rural and remote populations suggesting that MHEC-RAP could address limitations in access to specialist care and change the provision of emergency mental health care elsewhere. CONCLUSION: MHEC-RAP has not only provided access to specialist mental health care for local ED providers, but it has changed their practice and perspective. MHEC-RAP could be adapted for implementation elsewhere. Provider experience confirms that the program is accessible and offers insights to those considering how to establish an emergency telepyschiatry service in other settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4419396
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44193962015-05-06 No longer ‘flying blind’: how access has changed emergency mental health care in rural and remote emergency departments, a qualitative study Saurman, Emily Kirby, Sue E Lyle, David BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Mental health presentations are considered to be a difficult aspect of emergency care. Although emergency department (ED) staff is qualified to provide emergency mental health care, for some, such presentations pose a challenge to their training, confidence, and time. Providing access to relevant and responsive specialist mental health care can influence care and management for these patients. The Mental Health Emergency Care-Rural Access Program (MHEC-RAP) is a telepsychiatry program that was established to improve access to specialist emergency mental health care across rural and remote western NSW, Australia. METHOD: This study uses interviews with ED providers to understand their experience of managing emergency mental health patients and their use of MHEC-RAP. The lens of access was applied to assess program impact and inform continuing program development. RESULTS: With MHEC-RAP, these ED providers are no longer ‘flying blind’. They are also more confident to manage and care for emergency mental health patients locally. For these providers, access to specialists who are able to conduct assessments and provide relevant and responsive advice for emergency mental health presentations was valued. Assessing the fit between the consumer and service as a requirement for the development, evaluation, and ongoing management of the service should result in decisions about design and delivery that achieve improved access to care and meet the needs of their consumers. The experience of these providers prior to MHEC-RAP is consistent with that reported in other rural and remote populations suggesting that MHEC-RAP could address limitations in access to specialist care and change the provision of emergency mental health care elsewhere. CONCLUSION: MHEC-RAP has not only provided access to specialist mental health care for local ED providers, but it has changed their practice and perspective. MHEC-RAP could be adapted for implementation elsewhere. Provider experience confirms that the program is accessible and offers insights to those considering how to establish an emergency telepyschiatry service in other settings. BioMed Central 2015-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4419396/ /pubmed/25889260 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-0839-7 Text en © Saurman et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Saurman, Emily
Kirby, Sue E
Lyle, David
No longer ‘flying blind’: how access has changed emergency mental health care in rural and remote emergency departments, a qualitative study
title No longer ‘flying blind’: how access has changed emergency mental health care in rural and remote emergency departments, a qualitative study
title_full No longer ‘flying blind’: how access has changed emergency mental health care in rural and remote emergency departments, a qualitative study
title_fullStr No longer ‘flying blind’: how access has changed emergency mental health care in rural and remote emergency departments, a qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed No longer ‘flying blind’: how access has changed emergency mental health care in rural and remote emergency departments, a qualitative study
title_short No longer ‘flying blind’: how access has changed emergency mental health care in rural and remote emergency departments, a qualitative study
title_sort no longer ‘flying blind’: how access has changed emergency mental health care in rural and remote emergency departments, a qualitative study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4419396/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25889260
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-0839-7
work_keys_str_mv AT saurmanemily nolongerflyingblindhowaccesshaschangedemergencymentalhealthcareinruralandremoteemergencydepartmentsaqualitativestudy
AT kirbysuee nolongerflyingblindhowaccesshaschangedemergencymentalhealthcareinruralandremoteemergencydepartmentsaqualitativestudy
AT lyledavid nolongerflyingblindhowaccesshaschangedemergencymentalhealthcareinruralandremoteemergencydepartmentsaqualitativestudy