Cargando…

Expert opinion on the management of pain in hospitalised older patients with cognitive impairment: a mixed methods analysis of a national survey

BACKGROUND: Hospitalised older patients are complex. Comorbidity and polypharmacy complicate frailty. Significant numbers have dementia and/or cognitive impairment. Pain is highly prevalent. The evidence base for pain management in cognitively impaired individuals is sparse due to methodological iss...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rodger, Kirsty TM, Greasley-Adams, Corinne, Hodge, Zoe, Reynish, Emma
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4419491/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25928876
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-015-0056-6
_version_ 1782369585530404864
author Rodger, Kirsty TM
Greasley-Adams, Corinne
Hodge, Zoe
Reynish, Emma
author_facet Rodger, Kirsty TM
Greasley-Adams, Corinne
Hodge, Zoe
Reynish, Emma
author_sort Rodger, Kirsty TM
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hospitalised older patients are complex. Comorbidity and polypharmacy complicate frailty. Significant numbers have dementia and/or cognitive impairment. Pain is highly prevalent. The evidence base for pain management in cognitively impaired individuals is sparse due to methodological issues. A wealth of expert opinion is recognised potentially providing a useful evidence base for guiding clinical practice. The study aimed to gather expert opinion on pain management in cognitively impaired hospitalised older people. METHODS: Consultant Geriatricians listed as dementia leads in the National Dementia Audit were contacted electronically and invited to respond. The questionnaire sought information on their role, confidence and approach to pain management in cognitively impaired hospitalised patients. Responses were analysed using a mixed methods approach. RESULTS: Respondents considered themselves very confident in the clinical field. Awareness of potential to do harm was highly evident. Unequivocally responses suggested paracetamol is safe and should be first choice analgesic, newer opiates should be used preferentially in renal impairment and nefopam is unsafe. A grading of the safety profile of specific medications became apparent, prompting requirement for further evaluation and holistic assessment. CONCLUSION: The lack of consensus reached highlights the complexity of this clinical field. The use of paracetamol first line, newer opiates in renal impairment and avoidance of nefopam are immediately transferrable to clinical practice. Further review, evaluation and comparison of the risks associated with other specific analgesics are necessary before a comprehensive clinical guideline can be produced. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12877-015-0056-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4419491
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44194912015-05-06 Expert opinion on the management of pain in hospitalised older patients with cognitive impairment: a mixed methods analysis of a national survey Rodger, Kirsty TM Greasley-Adams, Corinne Hodge, Zoe Reynish, Emma BMC Geriatr Research Article BACKGROUND: Hospitalised older patients are complex. Comorbidity and polypharmacy complicate frailty. Significant numbers have dementia and/or cognitive impairment. Pain is highly prevalent. The evidence base for pain management in cognitively impaired individuals is sparse due to methodological issues. A wealth of expert opinion is recognised potentially providing a useful evidence base for guiding clinical practice. The study aimed to gather expert opinion on pain management in cognitively impaired hospitalised older people. METHODS: Consultant Geriatricians listed as dementia leads in the National Dementia Audit were contacted electronically and invited to respond. The questionnaire sought information on their role, confidence and approach to pain management in cognitively impaired hospitalised patients. Responses were analysed using a mixed methods approach. RESULTS: Respondents considered themselves very confident in the clinical field. Awareness of potential to do harm was highly evident. Unequivocally responses suggested paracetamol is safe and should be first choice analgesic, newer opiates should be used preferentially in renal impairment and nefopam is unsafe. A grading of the safety profile of specific medications became apparent, prompting requirement for further evaluation and holistic assessment. CONCLUSION: The lack of consensus reached highlights the complexity of this clinical field. The use of paracetamol first line, newer opiates in renal impairment and avoidance of nefopam are immediately transferrable to clinical practice. Further review, evaluation and comparison of the risks associated with other specific analgesics are necessary before a comprehensive clinical guideline can be produced. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12877-015-0056-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4419491/ /pubmed/25928876 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-015-0056-6 Text en © Rodger et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rodger, Kirsty TM
Greasley-Adams, Corinne
Hodge, Zoe
Reynish, Emma
Expert opinion on the management of pain in hospitalised older patients with cognitive impairment: a mixed methods analysis of a national survey
title Expert opinion on the management of pain in hospitalised older patients with cognitive impairment: a mixed methods analysis of a national survey
title_full Expert opinion on the management of pain in hospitalised older patients with cognitive impairment: a mixed methods analysis of a national survey
title_fullStr Expert opinion on the management of pain in hospitalised older patients with cognitive impairment: a mixed methods analysis of a national survey
title_full_unstemmed Expert opinion on the management of pain in hospitalised older patients with cognitive impairment: a mixed methods analysis of a national survey
title_short Expert opinion on the management of pain in hospitalised older patients with cognitive impairment: a mixed methods analysis of a national survey
title_sort expert opinion on the management of pain in hospitalised older patients with cognitive impairment: a mixed methods analysis of a national survey
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4419491/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25928876
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-015-0056-6
work_keys_str_mv AT rodgerkirstytm expertopiniononthemanagementofpaininhospitalisedolderpatientswithcognitiveimpairmentamixedmethodsanalysisofanationalsurvey
AT greasleyadamscorinne expertopiniononthemanagementofpaininhospitalisedolderpatientswithcognitiveimpairmentamixedmethodsanalysisofanationalsurvey
AT hodgezoe expertopiniononthemanagementofpaininhospitalisedolderpatientswithcognitiveimpairmentamixedmethodsanalysisofanationalsurvey
AT reynishemma expertopiniononthemanagementofpaininhospitalisedolderpatientswithcognitiveimpairmentamixedmethodsanalysisofanationalsurvey